by Louis Navellier

August 29, 2023

Now that earnings season is virtually over, I’d say our energy stocks have emerged as market leaders and exhibited tremendous relative strength in an otherwise weak August market. I have often written that I do not like August, since it is a month too often characterized by light trading volume and some resulting trader shenanigans, as algo-driven traders often take advantage of light volume to manipulate prices.

The latest market shenanigans come from “zero-day options,” causing sharp sell-offs or short covering rallies. Amazingly, zero-day options (which expire on the same day they are issued) now account for 43% of all options, up from only 6% back in 2017. This essentially means that the “tail is wagging the dog” via daily market swings generated by ultra-short-term trading. In our firm, as I said on Friday’s podcast, we like to call these option gyrations “Skynet,” after the Terminator movies – where AI takes over the world.

Speaking of AI, I am ecstatic with the results delivered by both Nvidia and Super Micro Computer, since they are both characterized by explosive sales and earnings. AI is essentially our machines studying us – which is essentially no different than our pets studying us for clues about what we like. Whether our machines are merely observing us and providing a solution or plotting against us is always up for debate.

On Wednesday, Nvidia posted massive sales and earnings surprises of +20.9% and +29.2%, respectively, while raising their guidance 37.5% above analyst estimates!  Wow, I think we can all agree that AI is hotter than hot and Nvidia is the leader of the pack. Nvidia posted a 101.6% annual sales increase ($13.51 billion vs. $6.7 billion) and a 429.4% annual earnings increase ($2.70 per share vs. 51 cents per share).

With such results, I am proud that Nvidia is the largest holding in our managed accounts. I have been recommending Nvidia for years and, looking forward, Nvidia is unquestionably the new market leader.

These two great stocks fell after releasing great news.  Why?  This is another August “shenanigan,” led by big trading firms. For instance, Citadel’s trading algorithms are largely based on mean revision, or “what goes up must come down,” so after Super Micro Computer reported second-quarter annual sales growth of 70.3%, it and other AI stocks got hit with profit-taking. Mean reversion in Citadel’s algorithm tries to shake out investors who don’t think Nvidia or Super Micro Computer’s sales and earnings are sustainable.

Fortunately, our energy stocks have been an oasis as the AI stocks were hit with profit-taking, but I also believe that SMCI and NVDA will revive. I should add that a noted perpetual bear, Morgan Stanley strategist Michael Wilson, said that Thursday’s reversal in Nvidia shows that the 2023 market rally is “exhausted,” predicting more declines to come. To his credit, Wilson recently admitted that his recent bearish calls were wrong, so far, but it is easy to explain why he and Morgan Stanley are often so bearish.

Morgan Stanley sells a lot of private credit and alternative investments to its clients, so it needs a prominent bearish strategist to divert its clients away from the stock market into their more profitable alternative investments, where Morgan Stanley collects big fees. As a result, Michael Wilson’s views, in my opinion, have no credibility, since he and Morgan Stanley have a major conflict of interest.

Regarding AI, self-driving cars are still a work in progress, not ready from prime time. Test cars in San Francisco occasionally drive on wet concrete or hit fire trucks. When the 5G network in San Francisco had a glitch, all self-driving cars abruptly stopped, awaiting new instructions. Please do not worry about AI too much, since AI can be unplugged anytime it annoys you. In the meantime, Bloomberg reported that San Francisco residents are becoming increasingly annoyed with the Waymo self-driving taxis.

I can tell from some of your e-mails that many of you are over-concentrated in AI stocks and do not own any energy stocks. I have been saying that energy stocks benefit from a seasonal surge in demand in the summer, but since they were down early in the year, some did not believe me, even though this seasonal demand has happened every year I have been alive. I want you to own AI, energy, and other stocks, too!

What our AI-driven stock optimization models do is to strive to find stocks that “zig” when other stocks “zag.” Our optimization models strive to combine individual stocks into smooth growth in a diversified portfolio. Thanks to our optimization model and diversification, we can weather a correction in AI stocks.

Due to this strategy, the last two months have delivered some of our strongest relative performance vs. the S&P 500 since last October and November, as we have benefited from both AI and energy-related stocks. As long as you remain diversified, you can invest confidently. That said, I should add that I do not have any exposure to financial stocks that can suffer from high interest rates or insurance stocks subject to large payouts for natural disasters. Even though the financial media constantly tries to scare you to boost ratings, if you have a diversified portfolio of fundamentally superior stocks, you can invest confidently and not worry about all the external distractions that can derail a fundamentally superior stock portfolio.

Another sub-sector that is serving us well now is our shipping stocks, which continue to perform well due to the fact that many cargo ships remain at sea longer than normal. Initially, that was because energy is being shipped from all over the world and the shipping routes are longer than ever. Another glitch is that the Panama Canal is suffering from a drought, with low water levels, so there is a big backlog, since some ships have to unload some of their cargo due to low water levels. Cargo ships have priority in the Panama Canal, which is causing ships transporting LNG and refined products to wait longer to traverse the canal.

In addition, Europe’s Rhine River in Germany is at a seasonal low, and our Mississippi River has also failed to recover from last year’s low levels, so river traffic is backing up and resulting in shipping delays.

The Ukraine/Russia War and China’s Deflation Have Slowed Global Growth

Speaking of slower ships fighting low tides in tight places, the shipments of goods, excluding defense and aircraft, declined 0.2% in July, so the manufacturing sector remains suppressed. That may be one reason why the Commerce Department announced last Thursday that durable goods orders declined 5.2% in July after a big surge in June. In July, commercial aircraft orders declined 44%. Excluding transportation, durable goods orders rose 0.5%. Also, July defense orders rose 2.5% after declining in previous months.

Speaking of defense orders, the Presidential debates on Wednesday triggered a big reaction when Vivek Ramaswamy called for ending our proxy war between Ukraine and Russia. When Chris Christie tried to defend spending more on Ukraine, the crowd started to boo. Clearly, the billions of dollars being sent to Ukraine, while major U.S. cities decay and Maui struggles to recover, is now a very contentious issue.

Amazingly, the Ukraine war has cost the U.S. more in the past 18 months than 20 years of occupation and war in Afghanistan. Russia has pivoted to Northeastern Ukraine and is trying to retake territory Ukraine recaptured last fall. Complicating matters further, the Biden Administration last week urged U.S. citizens to flee Belarus immediately, warning against any travel. Officially, the State Department categorized Belarus as a Level 4 risk, as there is a growing chance that Russia may try to invade Ukraine via Belarus.

Ukraine has now lost as many as 400,000 soldiers and well over 100,000 injured, so even if Ukraine wants to continue to fight, it is running out of troops. The cost and human casualties of this war are now becoming increasingly intolerable, so it will be interesting to see if a ceasefire agreement will be possible.

I should add that Russia closed its airports three times last week due to Ukrainian drone attacks around Moscow, so the war is no longer just defensive and has escalated well beyond Ukraine’s border.

Turning to China, the Biden Administration’s National Security Advisor, Jake Sullivan, on Tuesday called on China to be more transparent about the state of its economy. Specifically, Sullivan said, “For global confidence, predictability and the capacity of the rest of the world to make sound economic decisions, it’s important for China to maintain a level of transparency in the publication of its data.” I should add that U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo is scheduled to travel to China soon for high level talks.

Meanwhile, the Biden Administration’s economic policy of aggressively onshoring semiconductor and battery manufacturing is showing signs of stress. For example, a Biden ally, namely the UAW, said that Stellantis is threatening to move production of its Ram 1500 trucks to Mexico from suburban Detroit to reduce costs; otherwise automakers have to raise prices on gas-powered vehicles to compensate for their growing EV losses. The Mustang Mach-e now has a 116-day supply and even GM’s mighty Hummer now has over a 100-day supply. Clearly, the Big 3 are struggling to sell EVs in the wake of Tesla’s price cuts.

The Wall Street Journal last week published an opinion piece titled, “The Electric-Vehicle Bubble Starts to Deflate.” Essentially, this opinion piece said that the “collapsing electric-vehicle bubble … is a lesson in how industries built by government often also fail because of government.”  The Journal cited a “plethora of Chinese EV start-ups launched in the past decade” and noted that many of these start-ups are failing as Beijing reduced industry subsidies. The Journal article also said that scrapyards around China are littered with EVs with outdated technology. Other examples: Volkswagen’s joint venture in China announced up to a $8,200 discount on its new ID.6 model, while GM dealers in China are now discounting EVs by more than 25%. In the U.S., EV inventory has swelled to 103 days of supply according to Cox Automotive.

The U.S. EV incentives may continue to expand, since clearly there is much more supply than demand. Furthermore, China’s deflation in EVs should spread around the world. The WSJ concluded by saying, “Business failures are inevitable in a dynamic economy, but government will be mainly responsible for the destruction that results from its force-fed EV transition—and the damage may only just be starting.”

One casualty of China’s slowdown appears to be Germany, since the Ifo institute’s sentiment gauge declined to 85.7 in August, down from 87.4 in July. In a statement, Germany’s Economic Minister Robert Habeck said, “The restrictive interest rate environment and the weak global economy — especially the developments in China — make it difficult for us as an export nation.” Ifo’s Klaus Wohlrabe added, on Bloomberg TV, that the Ifo institute expects German output to hover around the “zero growth line.”

Looking forward, I expect that the U.S. will have to import some of China’s deflation, causing U.S. inflation rates to decline to the Fed’s 2% annual target range in the upcoming months. This will allow the Fed to begin cutting key interest rates by its December FOMC meeting. I also expect that we’ll see further Fed cuts in early 2024. Then, as the Presidential election approaches, the Fed usually likes to crawl into a hole and hide, since it does not want to be part of the Presidential debates. Overall, I expect that the breadth and power of the stock market will steadily improve, thanks to healthy consumer spending.

Navellier & Associates owns Nvidia Corp (NVDA), Volkswagen Ag. (VWAGY), and Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) in managed accounts. We do not own General Motors (GM), or Stellantis (STLA). Louis Navellier and his family own Nvidia Corp (NVDA), Volkswagen Ag. (VWAGY), and Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI), via a Navellier managed account. He does not own General Motors (GM), or Stellantis (STLA).

All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

Also In This Issue

Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
The Stock Market Reaches Another Fork in the Road

Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
Why Good Stocks Go Down in Price…on Good News

View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here

About The Author

Louis Navellier

Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at or by requesting a copy by emailing All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.