by Gary Alexander
September 15, 2026
“In every age … progressive improvement has been taking place, [but] nobody seems to reckon on any improvement in the next generation. We cannot absolutely prove that those are in error who say society has reached a turning point – that we have seen our best days. But so said all who came before us … On what principle is it that with nothing but improvement behind us, we are to expect nothing but deterioration before us?” — Thomas Babington Macaulay, writing in the Edinburgh Review (1830).
Every month, toward the end of the month, the Conference Board releases its “confidence index,” which is combination between confidence in the “Present Situation” and on “Future Expectations.”
Our response to that poll reflects a split personality. For some odd reason, the majority feel pretty good about the present, but we then turn dismal – like that Macaulay quote, above – in “Expecting nothing but deterioration before us.” This must be a factor of human psychology more than economics, or logic.
Let’s look at the latest report, released August 25, based on a survey conducted August 3 to 16. In that report, the Present Situation is bullish (at 121.2. with 100 as the baseline), but the Expectations Index is barely half that level, at 68.2 – a 53-point spread. Even worse, the two are moving in opposite directions.
According to the Conference Board, which conducts and publishes this survey, “The Present Situation Index—based on consumers’ assessment of current business and labor market conditions—rose by 6.8 points to 121.2, The Expectations Index—based on consumers’ short-term outlook for income, business, and labor market conditions—fell by 5.8 points to 68.2,” so Americans feel much better about their life today, and much worse about their future – at the same time, August 3–16, 2026. What’s that all about?
According to the Conference Board, The Consumer Confidence Index is benchmarked at 100, which was set back in 1985. Released on the last Tuesday of every month, here’s what their numbers basically mean:
• Over 100 indicates that consumers are more optimistic versus the benchmark.
• Exactly 100 indicates that consumers are neutral versus the benchmark.
• Under 100 indicates that consumers are more pessimistic versus the benchmark
With 100 being neutral, Americans think the present is great (121), but the future is filled with land mines (68). This is bizarre behavior, especially considering the fourth quarter is coming soon – the quarter when we have family holidays, football, falling leaves and rising markets. Historically, America’s stock market delivers more market gains than the other three quarters combined, especially in midterm election years.
This recent expanding division between a positive present and a dismal future is not new. This spread has dominated the last decade of the survey (below). From 2009 to 2012, in Obama’s first term, the future seemed better than the present, but that trend inverted since 2015, except for the COVID pandemic year:
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
There’s another statistical anomaly at work here. Most respondents feel pretty good about their current income and even better about their future prospects, 3-6 months from now. So…How is it possible U.S. families feel real good about their own future financial security but bad about the rest of America?
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
Once again, this dichotomy represents a split personality, or “I’m OK, you’re not, you poor soul.”
In these two polls, we see a better future for us, but not the nation. Why is that? I would lay most of the blame on the media, as “Bad news sells” or (for TV), “If it bleeds, it leads.” People love to rubber-neck at roadside accidents, or watching endless videos of floods in Nepal, or airplane crashes, but those are rare anomalies. Most rivers don’t flood and 99.999% of commercial airline flights take off and land safely.
My theory is that the media keep wanting to scare us. I could take the page-1 headlines from almost any daily newspaper for evidence, but I won’t waste your time with that exercise in the obvious. You can see the evidence for yourself. Instead, I’ll turn to my favorite information media – books. I’ve read dismal financial predictions my whole life, ever since the 1950s, and I believed most of them, then, and for far too long, until 1990 when I turned bullish and formed the whimsical group “Apocaholics Anonymous.”
For as long as I’ve been in this business – since the late 1960s – the financial best-sellers have been books about the coming doomsday, so I became the run-of-the-mill profit of doom until the late 1980s, through books ranging from “The Population Bomb” and “Famine 1975” in the late 1960s, predicting hundreds of millions of deaths due to starvation by the mid-1970s, and a depletion of nearly all natural resources by 1990 (a key tenet of “Limits of Growth”). There were also religious books on “the Late Great Earth.”
All these books pointed to a dismal future, not the better conditions which thankfully evolved, driven by technological improvements (like the “Green Revolution”) creating a better (and well-fed) world to come.
When it came to the 1990s, during my belated revolution against all this nonsense, the hits kept coming:
There was no Greater Depression, or Great Bankruptcy in 1995, even though that book was all the rage in the early 1990s. In fact, we had our first string of four federal budget surpluses starting in 1997.
Why Is Confidence in the Future Retreating as the Fourth Quarter is Coming Soon?
As for timing, the latest Consumer Confidence poll – in August in a midterm election year – gave respondents a great opportunity to check into history books about previous autumn markets in mid-term election years. As this chart shows, over the last 90+ years, markets bottomed out in September and then soared an average of nearly 7% from mid-September to the end of the year, before and after election day.
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
In the face of these misleading confidence polls, September calls for common sense and rational thinking, not surrendering to scary tales of Octobers past. Recent Octobers have been great, after September lows, so it’s time to bet against the crowd of depressed respondents to confidence polls and proclaim to any and all pollsters, “The Future Looks Bright.” You will likely be among successful contrarians if you do.
All content above represents the opinion of Gary Alexander of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Also In This Issue
A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
Inflation Returns, Raising the Odds for a Key Fed Rate Increase
Income Mail by Bryan Perry
Stocks Adjust to a “New Normal” for 10-Year Treasury Rates
Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
The Monthly “Confidence Index” Reveals Irrational Fears
Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
Here Comes the Fed Rate Hike
Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
Markets Have Shape…and Memory
View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here
About The Author
Gary Alexander
SENIOR EDITOR
Gary Alexander has been Senior Writer at Navellier since 2009. He edits Navellier’s weekly Marketmail and writes a weekly Growth Mail column, in which he uses market history to support the case for growth stocks. For the previous 20-years before joining Navellier, he was Senior Executive Editor at InvestorPlace Media (formerly Phillips Publishing), where he worked with several leading investment analysts, including Louis Navellier (since 1997), helping launch Louis Navellier’s Blue Chip Growth and Global Growth newsletters.
Prior to that, Gary edited Wealth Magazine and Gold Newsletter and wrote various investment research reports for Jefferson Financial in New Orleans in the 1980s. He began his financial newsletter career with KCI Communications in 1980, where he served as consulting editor for Personal Finance newsletter while serving as general manager of KCI’s Alexandria House book division. Before that, he covered the economics beat for news magazines. All content of “Growth Mail” represents the opinion of Gary Alexander
Important Disclosures:
Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.
Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.
None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.
Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.
One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.
ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:
- ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
- An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
- The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
- The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
- Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.
Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.
This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.
FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.
IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades. Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.
Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.
Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.
FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.