by Louis Navellier
August 8, 2023
The most amusing central bank news in recent years is that the Bank of England asked former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke to review its economic forecast after it failed so badly to stop inflation. Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey said that Mr. Bernanke’s review would help central bankers “take a step back and reflect on where our processes need to adapt.” Bailey said back in May that there were “very big lessons to learn” after the Bank of England failed to forecast high and persistent inflation.
Frankly, I am shocked that Governor Bailey cannot see the obvious – that Britain’s green push raised electricity rates sky high, and Europe’s green war on chemical fertilizers is causing food prices to soar! The fact that Ireland chose to kill 200,000 dairy cows to comply with EU carbon dioxide emissions further demonstrates why food prices are soaring out of control – mostly for ideological reasons.
So, if I were writing Ben Bernanke’s report, I would tell Bailey to “look in the mirror” and adjust his inflation forecasts upward for more expensive food and energy due to “green policies and mandates.”
The Bank of England raised its key interest rates another 0.25% last Thursday to a 15-year high of 5.25%. Since most mortgages in Britain have a variable rate, every rate increase by the Bank of England costs homeowners and curtails cash available for consumer spending. This fuels widespread anger against the Bank of England for mismanaging inflation, which is why Bailey asked Bernanke to review their plans.
The situation isn’t much better in the EU. Eurostat reported last week that the EU grew by just 0.3% (a 1.2% annual pace) in the second quarter, due largely to a 3.3% surge in Ireland’s economic growth, which is due in large part to shifts in intellectual property by U.S. technology companies and pharmaceutical giants. Inflation declined in 15 of the 20 EU countries and is now running at a 5.3% annual pace. A 6.1% decline in energy prices in the EU in July provided much of the EU inflation relief, but core inflation, excluding food and energy, is running at a 5.5% annual pace and has not declined significantly this year.
In the U.S., we are fortunate to be food and energy independent, but food inflation remains an acute problem in the EU. The green agenda, trade protectionism, and the chaos in Ukraine are causing global food prices to rise. Energy prices remain firm, simply because there are too many global uncertainties.
While Europe and America are trying to slay inflation, China is apparently slipping into a deflationary environment. The Wall Street Journal reported that prices charged for products from Chinese factories have been falling for months. Consumer inflation in China declined to 0% in June, which is a 28-month low. Annual producer price inflation has been negative in China for nine straight months and declined to an all-time annual low of -5.4% in June, its lowest level since December 2015.
I should add that Chinese semiconductor imports are declining due to the Biden Administration’s chip restrictions. As a result, Chinese companies are struggling to obtain key components and machinery. The threat of additional U.S. restrictions, including restricting China’s access to cloud computing, which is being upgraded by Super Micro Computer to also include AI chips on smart servers, is expected to be announced in October in conjunction with export control numbers, according to The Wall Street Journal.
The Jobs Reports (ADP vs. Labor) Are in Conflict Again
Last Wednesday, ADP (the payroll company) announced that 324,000 private payroll jobs were created in July, which was substantially higher than the economists’ consensus estimate of 189,000. The previous month’s June private payroll report was revised lower to 455,000 jobs, down from ADP’s first estimate of 497,000. ADP continues to report manufacturing job losses, with another 36,000 manufacturing jobs lost in July, while leisure & hospitality added 201,000 jobs and natural resources & mining added 48,000.
As usual, Friday’s Labor Department report was grossly out of synch with ADP’s report, especially on the politically sensitive subject of manufacturing jobs. Friday’s July payroll report said America created a total of 187,000 non-farm payroll jobs, but the Labor Department also said that only 2,000 manufacturing jobs were lost, vs. 36,000 for ADP. Furthermore, the payroll reports for May and June were revised down by a cumulative 49,000 jobs. I tend to favor the ADP report since they deal first-hand with actual payrolls and because the Labor Department uses arcane seasonal adjustment formulas instead of the raw jobs data.
The Labor Department also announced that productivity surged 3.7% in the second quarter after declining in the first quarter. One reason that productivity rose in the second quarter is that labor costs only rose 1.6% after surging 3.3% in the first quarter. Productivity growth is a big component of GDP growth, which may explain why the Atlanta Fed is now estimating 3.9% annual GDP growth in the third quarter. (I should add that private economists are nowhere near as bullish as the Atlanta Fed’s GDP estimate.)
In other statistical releases, the Institute of Supply Management (ISM) announced on Tuesday that its manufacturing index rose to 46.4 in July, up from 46.0 in June. Economists were expecting the ISM number to come in at 46.9, so 46.4 was disappointing. This is the 8th month in a row in which the ISM manufacturing report has been below 50, which signals a contraction. Only two of the 18 manufacturing industries surveyed expanded in July, namely Petroleum & Coal as well as Furniture & Related products. Clearly, a manufacturing recession persists and may get worse, especially if the UAW goes on strike in the upcoming months due to wage concerns as well as the excessive inventory on dealer lots.
On Thursday, ISM announced that its non-manufacturing (services) index declined to 52.7 in July, down from 53.9 in June. Any reading over 50 signals an expansion, and there are some other strong indicators: The backlog of orders component surged to 52.1 in July, up from 43.9 in June, which is encouraging. Also, 14 of the 18 service industries surveyed in July reported growth, so although the pace of growth in the service sector slowed in July, the service sector remains very healthy and is leading GDP growth.
The major inflation reports (CPI and PPI) come out later this week, and they should be favorable. The primary reason why U.S. wholesale goods prices fell 4.4% in the past 12 months through June is due to lower import prices from China and other Asian countries. As a result, I expect that the July PPI could be negative as the U.S. continues to import deflation from China and other Asian exporting countries.
Updates from the Energy Patch
Besides the normal peak driving season, the price of oil is rising because Russia’s four-week average of seaborne crude oil shipments as of July 30th declined to 2.98 million barrels per day, the lowest level since January 8. Specifically, Russian crude oil shipments peaked May 14th at 3.9 million barrels per day and have steadily declined almost every week since then. Europe has stopped buying Russian crude oil, except for Bulgaria, which buys 125,000 barrels per day from its Black Sea port. As of July 30th, Russia’s crude oil export duty rose to $49 million in the past week, up 8% from the previous week, due to higher crude oil prices. It will be interesting to see if Russia continues to curtail its crude oil exports to boost crude oil prices or if it is having production and/or pipeline problems. Russia has to keep its crude oil in the Arctic flowing through pipelines in the winter months, otherwise an empty pipeline could freeze and burst. Obviously, Russia remains a wild card in the global oil market that could impact crude oil prices.
The other wild card putting upward pressure on crude oil prices is the closure of Pemex’s largest export terminal last Tuesday due to a leak. Pemex has faced a series of operational challenges recently, including the shutdown of its Salina Cruz terminal and an explosion on a gas platform that resulted in two fatalities.
Saudi Arabia reiterated Thursday that its production cut would continue for at least another month. Saudi Arabia is currently producing 9 million barrels per day of crude oil, its lowest level in several years. This Friday, Saudi Arabia and Russia will chair an online review of market conditions for OPEC+ members. The next OPEC+ meeting is late November, so I do not expect any potential production increases, since seasonal demand may drop in September, so OPEC+ will likely have no incentive to boost production.
In the U.S., the American Petroleum Institute (API) announced on Tuesday that crude oil inventories collapsed by 15.4 million barrels in the latest week. API also reported that gasoline inventories declined 1.68 million barrels per day in the latest week, while distillate (diesel, heating oil, and jet fuel) inventories declined by 512,000 barrels. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) reported a 17.05 million drawdown in the latest week, the largest weekly drawdown ever recorded since such records began in 1982! Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs said that worldwide crude oil demand rose to an all-time high of 102.8 million barrels a day in July, but they also forecast $93 per barrel for Brent sweet crude in 2024.
Sales of electric vehicles (EV) are still a challenge. GM announced that its second-quarter results were hindered by a $792 million extraordinary charge related to the recall of its Bolt electric vehicle (EV) to replace its LG battery packs. Excluding this extraordinary charge, GM posted strong sales and operating earnings. The average vehicle that GM sells now trades at around $52,000, up 3% for the first quarter, so GM is moving increasingly upscale with its vehicles. Due to GM’s strong operating earnings, I suspect the UAW will play hardball and likely go on strike if its demands are not met.
GM’s transition to EVs is meeting some frustrating roadblocks. Specifically, GM’s new Ultium platform is having an acute supplier problem, so its battery packs are now being manually assembled. CEO Mary Barra called the situation “disappointing” and she has “personally been reviewing the lines.” Barra added, “We’ll get this behind us,” and hopes the situation will be resolved by the end of the year. In the meantime, GM has only delivered 49 Hummer EVs this year due to the Ultium manufacturing problems.
Ford recently acknowledged the lack of consumer excitement about their F-150 Lightning electric trucks, which are sitting on dealer lots, deeply discounted; so its executives quickly pivoted and said they will be focusing on making many new hybrid models, which they hope consumers will be more likely to purchase.
Obviously, a hybrid F-150 can offer the electric hookups for power tools and tailgating, but not have the “range anxiety” that may be hindering the F-150 Lightning sales. Ford’s EV business lost $1.08 billion in the second quarter, so its EV business is not profitable at the present time. Ford said that it expects its EV business to lose $4.5 billion in 2023 and lowered its EV production forecast to 600,000 per year, which it hopes to achieve some time in 2024. Interestingly, Ford backed off its previous goal of two million EVs per year in 2026, apparently due to lackluster consumer demand.
Navellier & Associates does own Ford Motors (F) in some managed accounts. We do not own General Motors (GM). Louis Navellier does not own General Motors (GM), or Ford Motors (F), personally.
All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Also In This Issue
A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
The Bank of England Begs Ben Bernanke to Rescue Them!
Income Mail by Bryan Perry
The Great Rate Plateau Begins
Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
After No Recession in 45 Years – Will China’s Winning Streak End This Year?
Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
The Stock Market Sell-off Has Started, Where Could It Get To?
Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
Silver Linings in the Market’s Two Worst Months
View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here
Louis Navellier
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Important Disclosures:
Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.
Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.
None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.
Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.
One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.
ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:
- ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
- An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
- The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
- The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
- Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.
Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.
This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.
FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.
IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades. Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.
Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.
Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.
FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.