by Louis Navellier

July 18, 2023

The Labor Department reported last Wednesday that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose just 0.2% in June – and only 3% in the past 12 months – very close to the Fed’s 2% goal. Food prices rose 0.1%, while energy prices rose 0.6%, so the core CPI, excluding food and energy, also rose 0.2% in June and at a bit brisker rate, +4.8%, in the past 12 months. The housing component (Owners’ Equivalent Rent) rose 0.4% in June, which is down but still too high. Also, used car prices declined 0.5% after rising sharply by 4.4% in both April and May. Overall, the CPI came in at the slowest pace since March 2021, while the core CPI is the slowest rate since October 2021. In response, Treasury bond yields declined, which is a good sign, raising the probability that the Fed might pause at its late July Federal Open Market Committee meeting.

The Thursday release of the Producer Price Index (PPI) provided even better news, as it rose only 0.1% in June, the slowest rate in almost three years (since August 2020). The core PPI, excluding food and energy, rose 0.1% in June and 2.4% in the past 12 months. Also, wholesale goods declined 4.4% in the past year, so deflationary forces dominate the wholesale level, which indicates lower consumer inflation ahead.

Despite these positive trends, the consumer still feels under assault after two years of rising inflation, so President Biden’s approval rating now stands near an all-time low of 41%, while 54% of Americans disapprove of how President Biden is doing his job. Furthermore, the Fed reported that credit card debt officially hit a record high of over $1 trillion, so many households are still struggling with chronically higher prices.

In the middle of America – in “fly-over country,” where Americans tend to drive more – the Biden Administration’s quest to get consumers to switch to electric vehicles (EVs) has hit heavy resistance, despite Tesla’s 30% annual sales growth, boosted by recent price cuts. There is currently a 92-day supply glut of EVs sitting on dealer lots, vs. a 54-day supply for vehicles with internal combustion engines. Specifically, the inventory of EVs for sale in the second quarter rose 342% in the past year to 90,000.

Only about 8% of U.S. vehicle sales are forecasted to be EVs this year, and affordability remains a major hurdle to most buyers, as well as customer loyalty. Ford and GM are finding out is that the buyers of their EVs are not repeat buyers and are not loyal to their brand. As a result, the goodwill that Ford and GM built with their long-term lead in pickup and SUV sales is not apparently transferable to their EV models.

To cut costs in its EV fleet, Ford is retooling its EV manufacturing plants to switch to iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, since it only sold 4,466 F-150 Lightning models in the second quarter, due in part to their expensive lithium-ion batteries. VW Group has also curtailed production of its ID.4 EV, since it is apparently too expensive for most VW buyers due to its expensive lithium-ion batteries. The ultimate winner of the EV race will likely be the manufacturer that makes affordable EVs with cheaper LFP or LMFP batteries, just like BYD has broken out as the market leader in China with its affordable EVs.

As a result of all the Biden Administration’s interventions in motor vehicle sales, the United Auto Workers (UAW) has not endorsed Biden’s re-election campaign, apparently because they are uncomfortable with the Administration’s big EV push. EVs have fewer parts than vehicles with internal combustion engines, so they require fewer UAW workers. Complicating matters further, Tesla does not have UAW workers. Furthermore, the UAW’s contract with Ford, GM, and Stellantis expires in the next couple of months.

In America, many folks like their pickup trucks and SUVs – as well as their gas stoves – so any pressure from the government to make them switch to EVs as well as all-electric appliances, could receive a big pushback and hurt the Biden Administration’s re-election chances. Probably the best example of a pushback followed New York City’s Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) proposed rules that would order restaurants to reduce their carbon emissions by 75%, which would effectively require restaurant owners to buy expensive emission control devices on their pizza ovens. This war against iconic pizza joints is not going over well, as pizza fans are now chanting “give us pizza ovens or give us death.”

Obviously, many consumers do not like mandatory, politically based product changes, whether it has to do with vehicles, gas stoves or pizza ovens. However, widespread consumer outrage has more to do with the cash in their pockets than their political beliefs. As a Presidential Election Year approaches, the Biden Administration recently dispatched various cabinet secretaries around the U.S. to convince voters that they are doing a good job and Bidenonomics is working. Unfortunately, there is no evidence that the manufacturing sector is working, as ADP reported there were 42,000 manufacturing layoffs in June.

Since many Americans still have plenty of cash to spend, the U.S. economy is still recovering, so GDP growth has picked up – mostly due to an improving service sector as well as strong consumer confidence. Right now, the worst that can go wrong is if the Fed continues to raise key interest rates, despite ample evidence of inflation cooling. However, I am more confident than ever that the Fed will decisively hit the “pause” button due to lower inflation rates, as well as the Labor Department’s lackluster payroll data.

It is very unfortunate that the Fed relies on so much unreliable economic data that is tainted by wild seasonal adjustments as well as seemingly endless revisions. The good news is the Fed likes to stay out of the political spotlight, so I expect that they will start to cut key interest rates in December and continue to cut in the first half of 2024 to stimulate overall economic growth going into the election campaign.

This is Historically the Strongest Year of the Presidential Election Cycle

This is a good time to remind you that the third year of a Presidential election term, namely 2023 this time around, is the best performing year in the four-year Presidential election cycle, and the fourth year, is traditionally the second-best performing year in the four-year Presidential election cycle. Since the major Party candidate debates will commence in the upcoming months, I predict that the candidates with the most inspirational messages will break out of the pack as the leaders of their respective political Parties.

In his major overseas challenge, President Biden is meeting with NATO to provide Ukraine with cluster munitions – which are banned by over 100 nations. Despite the fact that chaos persists within Russia due to the Wagner Group’s aborted march on Moscow, this gives Ukraine an opening to capture or kill many of Russia’s reluctant troops. All wars are tragic. Both Russia and Ukraine have sustained massive losses. The fact that NATO and the U.S. are helping to escalate this war now – instead of finding a way to end it – is concerning to many parties and I expect will be problematic for the Biden Administration.

The only winners from the Russian invasion of Ukraine are some of the energy and shipping stocks in our portfolios. I wish it weren’t so, but global tensions have made our energy bet look better. In addition to the war and strong seasonal demand, Iran is acting badly, trying to hijack crude oil tankers again, so the U.S. Navy has been trying to thwart Iran in key shipping lanes. Also, many domestic energy producers have boosted their production, which bodes well for their quarterly announcements in upcoming weeks.

I cannot fathom why NATO and the Biden Administration would fund an escalation to the tragic war in Ukraine, especially after the Wagner Group’s pullout. The U.S. Navy no longer guarantees free trade around the world, so hijacking attempts of crude oil tankers and other commercial ships persist. The Biden Administration is doubling down on the Trump Administration’s restrictive trade policies with China and is pushing onshoring, which has not yet succeeded. Let’s hope that a Presidential candidate with a positive vision for both domestic and foreign policy can emerge and help inspire many Americans.

In addition, Europe may be emerging from recession due to war funding. Germany’s factory orders surged 6.4% in May, which is a sign that the eurozone may be crawling out of its recession. Orders for “other transport equipment,” which includes military equipment and ships, surged 137% in May. Overall, the increase in German factory orders is a good sign that its mighty manufacturing sector is re-surging.

Meanwhile, China may finally be headed for a recession after nearly 45 years of uninterrupted growth. China’s exports plunged 12.4% in June, while imports declined 6.8%. This is the biggest decline in exports since just after the start of the pandemic. China’s exports to the U.S. declined 24% in June, while its exports to the European Union dropped 13%. I should also add the exports from Japan, South Korea, and Vietnam all declined in June, since consumers worldwide are importing fewer goods.

I envision a second-half scenario where everything is about to get better in the U.S. The Fed will no longer raise interest rates due to favorable inflation data. The CPI and PPI last week proved that inflation has cooled immensely. Corporate earnings are forecasted to steadily improve for the next four quarters. There are at least four improving industry sectors where I can find strong stocks to buy. Although we are in a rolling recovery, more sectors are now participating. What makes America great is that our states are 50 economic laboratories, so even if New York wants to kill pizza ovens, others will succeed and prosper.

Navellier & Associates owns Volkswagen Ag. (VWAGY), and a few accounts own Ford Motor Co. (F). We own Tesla (TSLA), per client request in managed accounts. We do not own General Motors (GM), Stellantis (STLA), or BYD Company ADR (BYDDY), Louis Navellier and his family own Volkswagen Ag. (VWAGY), via a Navellier managed account. He does not own Ford Motor Co. (F), Tesla (TSLA), BYD Company ADR (BYDDY), Stellantis (STLA), or General Motors (GM), personally.

All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

About The Author

Louis Navellier

Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at or by requesting a copy by emailing All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.