by Gary Alexander
April 8, 2025
If you’ve followed these columns any amount of time, you know I’m an evangelist for turning around our high and rising annual budget deficits before it’s too late (See March 11 on “The Magic Formula for Creating Budget Surpluses,” or last week’s second half on “Gold is Rising Mostly Due to Soaring Deficits Since 2001”), but trade deficits are a different animal. Although these deficits can depress our quarterly GDP calculations – as I explained in last week’s Growth Mail – they are not debts that must be paid off, like budget deficits, or your personal debts. Trading is simply exchanging money for goods. Both parties benefit from a trade, or they wouldn’t make the exchange. It’s just like anything you buy. If a store in Tennessee buys an appliance line made in Kentucky, there is no “trade deficit” created in Tennessee.
The archaic notion of a “favorable” balance of trade came out of an old pre-Adam Smith theory called “mercantilism,” which basically said that a nation’s wealth depended on how much gold and silver they could accrue, either from expeditions to the New World, or in positive exports to their neighbors. To create a “trade surplus” (more gold), mercantilists added tariffs or subsidized their domestic exporters.
In 1776, Adam Smith attacked this system by bringing the consumer into the picture, championing lower-cost alternatives, while his contemporary David Ricardo explained the virtues of comparative advantage, with each nation exporting those goods which that nation produced more efficiently in open competition.
Over the next 250 years, the U.S. ran trade surpluses for a century from 1870 to 1975, in our era of greatest growth, but as we moved more toward a service economy, manufacturing jobs moved overseas.
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
Notice the sharpest dip in trade deficits began in the late 1990s, after the passage of NAFTA, at the same time budget deficits were balanced during fiscal years 1997-2001, so there is no correlation between trade deficits and budget deficits. Trade deficits are between corporations situated in two nations, while budget deficits are from fiscal policies in Congress financed by the Treasury. Never the twain met, back then.
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
Trade deficits exploded downward after 1997 at the same time we had budget surpluses, 1997-2001 (Seeking Alpha)
In a U.S. trade deficit, the other side gets paper money, and we get goods, but both sides got what they wanted, so trading is still favorable to both parties or they wouldn’t trade. Since the 1990s, exporters grew rich with cash, just as in the 19th century America imported capital, rising from relative poverty to become the greatest power of the 20th century, but now the dilemma is that high and rising U.S. trade deficits for the last 30 years created a job vacuum for middle class blue collar worker in America (1990s Presidential candidate Ross Perot called such job losses “that giant sucking sound”), and that is what President Trump is trying to attack by seeking on-shoring and more exports through pushing tariffs on the rest of the world.
The reason for his urgency is that the trade deficit deepened under Biden, up 80% in the last four years:
Trade Deficits are Not Tariffs
Wednesday, April 2nd was pre-announced as “Liberation Day,” but it turned out to be a portfolio-killing day, too, especially after the unveiling of Commerce Secretary Lutnick’s scary chart of high tariff targets.
If enacted, these will be the highest tariffs since 1909 (bigger than the 1930 Smoot-Hawley tariffs), and 10 times the level of tariffs in place when Trump took office in January. They could become a huge tax increase via inflation and are a mega-trillion-dollar market loss so far, all based on a slap-dash series of assumptions, most notably that trade deficits equal tariffs, and all tariffs are easily quantified, by formula.
It is unlikely that most of these tariffs will be enacted, as nations will soon be lining up to negotiate lower tariffs, but there are so many specific details to each nation’s trade policies that the details resemble the ancient Gordian Knot – best solved with a saber – which in this case would be zero tariffs on all sides.
As presented, Lutnik’s New Math lined up all nations for the firing squad, without any hearing for their side of the story. For instance, Vietnam recently inherited a lot of Chinese factories when U.S. operations moved from our major foe to a more friendly Vietnam. Last year Vietnam exported $136 billion in goods to us, and they imported only $13 billion for a trade deficit of $123 billion, which the Trump team called a 91% tariff. Vietnam did the right thing, to lower their tariffs in advance, but they got punished anyway.
Lutnik’s full national tariff chart runs to well over 100 nations, some of them remote islands with few people, and every nation has a minimum 10% tariff, plus half of whatever trade deficit they ran up in 2023. Some examples of small islands include Saint Pierre and Miquelon facing 50% tariffs on their tiny exports of $3.4 million while importing just $100,000 – called a “97% tariff.” Uninhabited Australian outposts of Heard and McDonald Islands face 10% tariffs, while Norfolk Island (population: 2,188) will be hit with 29% duties. This all sounds like a Gilbert & Sullivan operetta, or a good movie spoof script.
America enjoys trade surpluses with some major nations – including Great Britain and Australia – yet they are punished, too. Our favorite economist, usually a perma-bull, Ed Yardeni, is losing confidence in Trump writing, “It’s really a shame that Trump is so willing to take a wrecking ball to the economy. It has been very resilient over the past three years in the face of the tightening of monetary policy. We are losing our confidence that it can remain resilient in the face of Trump’s Reign of Tariffs.”
Well, I’m on the fence too, for now, but I’m not so quick to throw in the towel, so I’ll close with some predictions: (1) Tariffs will not replace income taxes, as Howard Lutnick wishes will happen. The 1880s were an era of very, very small government, unlike now, and today’s nations won’t pay these high tariffs, (2) Many nations will negotiate much smaller, even zero, tariffs and will “play ball” to keep trade flowing at a more reasonable cost, and (3) the stock market will recover from the current panic loss, probably by mid-year, as GDP recovers, but (4) the doomsday press will predict another crash, and many mobs of angry, crazy folks will stage violent riots, protesting Trump’s policies and Elon Musk’s actions.
In other words, my prediction is history will keep repeating itself, and markets will revert to the norm – which is to rise.
All content above represents the opinion of Gary Alexander of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Also In This Issue
A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
Friday’s Jobs Report Was Bullish – On an Ultra-Bearish Market Day
Income Mail by Bryan Perry
Time to Brace for Earnings Season – And Much-Needed Tariff Guidance
Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
Trade Deficits are Not Like Budget Deficits…or Tariffs
Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
A High-Stakes Game of Tariff Chicken
Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
The Tariffs Will…Anyone? Anyone?… Raise or Lower Revenue?
View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here
About The Author
Gary Alexander
SENIOR EDITOR
Gary Alexander has been Senior Writer at Navellier since 2009. He edits Navellier’s weekly Marketmail and writes a weekly Growth Mail column, in which he uses market history to support the case for growth stocks. For the previous 20 years before joining Navellier, he was Senior Executive Editor at InvestorPlace Media (formerly Phillips Publishing), where he worked with several leading investment analysts, including Louis Navellier (since 1997), helping launch Louis Navellier’s Blue Chip Growth and Global Growth newsletters.
Prior to that, Gary edited Wealth Magazine and Gold Newsletter and wrote various investment research reports for Jefferson Financial in New Orleans in the 1980s. He began his financial newsletter career with KCI Communications in 1980, where he served as consulting editor for Personal Finance newsletter while serving as general manager of KCI’s Alexandria House book division. Before that, he covered the economics beat for news magazines. All content of “Growth Mail” represents the opinion of Gary Alexander
Important Disclosures:
Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.
Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.
None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.
Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.
One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.
ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:
- ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
- An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
- The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
- The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
- Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.
Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.
This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.
FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.
IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades. Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.
Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.
Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.
FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.