by Louis Navellier

August 15, 2023

China is experiencing crippling deflation as its economy struggles with declining exports and imports for the past few months. In July, Chinese exports declined 14.5%, while imports plunged 12.4%. This marks the worst decline in exports since February of 2020 – the month when Covid-19 first struck China.

As a result of China’s collapse, the Commerce Department reported on Tuesday that the U.S. trade deficit declined 4.1% in June to $65.5 billion, as exports remained flat at $165.1 billion and imports declined 1.2% to $253.3 billion. Imports are now at their lowest level in three years. The U.S. trade deficit should continue to narrow in July due to higher energy prices. This should boost GDP growth in both quarters.

On Wednesday, the Chinese National Bureau of Statistics announced that consumer prices declined 0.3% in July, while producer prices declined a much more dramatic 4.4% in July. The unemployment rate for people 24 and younger is now at a record high, despite decades of a one-child policy causing China to have too few young workers to support their aging population. China isn’t exporting much now, since the whole world is doing more “onshoring,” after the trade backlog during Covid-19 revealed China to be an unreliable trading partner, so the long-term economic outlook for China is looking dire.

Complicating matters further, China’s official purchasing manager index (PMI) has now declined for four straight months and is at its lowest level in a year. A prolonged housing crisis from chronic overbuilding is also contributing to the deflationary pressure in China. This is all happening under censorship and the most severe dictatorship since the days of Mao. According to the Financial Times, “Chinese authorities are putting pressure on prominent local economists to avoid discussing negative trends such as deflation.”

Another source of global deflation is that the cost of electric vehicles (EVs) must come down as the inventory of unsold EVs continues to rise, so price discounts will likely persist. Tesla is curtailing its production in the third quarter to lower demand. Besides Tesla’s Cybertruck (designed for the “Zombie Apocalypse,” according to Elon Musk), the only other fast-selling EV is expected to be the VW ID.Buzz when it arrives in 2024; but other than these specialty EVs that look different than most EVs, EV sales continue to struggle.

As more EV production moves to Mexico, GM shut down its Bolt Orion manufacturing plant in Michigan to throttle up their Equinox EV production in Mexico, so the UAW remains worried about job security, since EVs require approximately 70% fewer parts to assemble. The UAW is asking for up to a 46% compensation increase for its 150,000 workers at Big 3 Detroit auto manufacturers. Specifically, that amounts to a 20% general wage increase, plus another 5% increase every September through 2027.

Further complicating China trade, the Biden Administration issued an executive order on Wednesday that banned U.S. investment in China for semiconductors, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence (AI). As poor relations between China and America persist, it will be interesting to see how China retaliates.

Here is what is really happening in that conflict. U.S. onshoring of semiconductor manufacturing and battery production has not been going well. For example, Taiwan Semiconductor has delayed the opening of its new plant in Arizona until 2025, while GM’s Mary Barra admitted that its Ultium platform is having acute supplier problems, so its battery packs are being manually assembled, which is why GM only made 47 Hummer EVs in the first half of 2023. Furthermore, if there is an EV manufacturing boom, it is really in Mexico, as Ford, GM, and Tesla are all boosting their EV production south of the border.

As I reported here last week, ADP reported big manufacturing job losses in the past couple of months, while the Labor Department didn’t report any significant manufacturing job losses. I think it is safe to say that the Labor Department is likely manipulating payroll figures through “seasonal adjustment” formulas.

Essentially, the Biden Administration has nothing to brag about with its onshoring efforts in the 2024 Presidential race and, in my opinion, it is purposely trying to mask recent manufacturing losses after the Institute of Supply Management (ISM) reported eight straight months that U.S. manufacturing activity contracted (meaning an ISM reading below 50). However, if the UAW goes on strike, then the Labor Department can suddenly report the thousands of manufacturing job losses that it has suppressed in recent months, since it can be explained by the UAW strike. I, for one, am expecting a UAW strike, because it will help the Biden Administration manipulate the payroll data via the Labor Department reports.

There may be some other problems brewing on the labor front, since the Labor Department reported on Thursday that weekly unemployment claims surged to 248,000 in the latest week, up from 227,000 in the previous week. This caused the four-week average to rise to 231,000. Continuing unemployment claims declined to 1.684 million in the latest week, down from 1.692 million in the previous week. The four-week moving average of continuing claims declined by 9,250 to 1.701 million, so that was good news.

ESG Was Invented in Europe – And It Also Backfired There First

Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) started in Europe, and it may now have to be rebranded in Britain. After the British government announced hundreds of new North Sea crude oil and natural gas licenses, banks that followed ESG standards were put in a pickle over whether or not they can fund increased fossil fuel exploration sites, which Britain is apparently doing for national security reasons.

Furthermore, the UK Emission Trading Scheme that was launched in 2021 after Brexit is now pricing carbon trading at a 40% discount to the European Union’s (EU) carbon offset prices. In other words, the price of polluting Britain is 40% cheaper than polluting the EU, so in theory, Britain has a competitive advantage compared to the rest of the EU. The truth of the matter is that Britain’s increasingly green electricity is very expensive, so Britain is striving to provide its citizens with some relief by lowering carbon offset prices. The bottom line is that British ESG no longer complies with Europe’s ESG.

As for U.S. ESG rulings, after S&P Global kicked Tesla out of its flagship ESG index and replaced it with Exxon Mobil back in May 2021, the definition of ESG has been debated endlessly, especially because Elon Musk repeatably mocks ESG. Besides putting an oil company above an EV firm on their ESG list, Musk is upset that the battery waste at its plant outside Reno was cited as the primary reason that Tesla was being booted from an S&P Global ESG index, while the real problem (according to Musk) comes from the part of the plant operated by Panasonic, which has not been booted from any ESG index.

Furthermore, Lucid utilized the same batteries as Tesla and they have not been booted from any ESG indices. The bottom line is that when Tesla was booted from an S&P Global ESG index, it caused a lot of confusion that ESG authorities cannot logically explain. Fortunately, S&P Global finally responded to the growing ESG outrage and dropped its alphanumeric ESG ratings, effective on August 4th.

In other energy-related news, the Ukrainian Sea drone that blew up the Russian tanker “Sig” in Crimea in the Black Sea that was “transporting fuel for the Russian troops,” is temporarily causing shipping costs and crude oil prices to rise. Officially, the Sig tanker was under U.S. sanctions for carrying fuel to Russian forces operating in Syria, according to the Treasury Department. However, whether sanctions can authorize Ukraine to attack is clearly an escalation that is now being debated by NATO authorities.

I should add that Russia unleashed a wave of drone attacks on Ukraine’s ports around Odessa, where grain storage facilities were damaged. Since the agreement that Turkey brokered to allow Ukraine to export grain and Russia to export fertilizer has lapsed, the fighting around Odessa and the Crimean Peninsula has clearly escalated, which is causing both global food and energy prices to rise.

Crude oil prices keep rising as Saudi Arabia threatened even deeper production cuts last week. This is apparently raising some concern within the Biden Administration as the election year approaches, as higher prices at the pump would be problematic. Officially, the Biden Administration has called on Saudi Arabia to pump more crude oil and accused OPEC+ of “aligning with Russia.” However, the real problem is that the Biden Administration has virtually no influence over Saudi Arabia after candidate Biden said the world should make Saudi Arabia “in fact the pariah that they are.” If that weren’t bad enough, Biden added that there is “very little social redeeming value in the present government in Saudi Arabia.”

In late July, the Biden Administration’s National Security Advisor, Jake Sullivan, visited Jeddah, Saudi Arabia to meet with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and senior officials to discuss bilateral and regional matters in an attempt to mend fences. So far, the news surrounding these meetings has been conspicuously quiet, implying very little progress being made. The Wall Street Journal reported last Wednesday that Sullivan’s goal is apparently to get Saudi Arabia to recognize Israel in exchange for concessions to Palestinians and U.S. security guarantees, and civilian nuclear help.

The element of nuclear help was a big surprise, and it is estimated that it will take 9-12 months to hammer out a deal. Obviously, the Biden Administration wants this deal to be wrapped up before the 2024 election. Although a rough deal may emerge, the details will be too complicated to implement that soon.

Overall, the U.S. remains an oasis compared to other economies. My favorite economist, Ed Yardeni, said in one Morning Briefing last week that we essentially have two choices, namely #1, Don’t Worry, Be Happy and #2, Worry, But Be Happy Anyway. I am in the latter camp. All good stock markets climb a wall of worry, but central bank fears will diminish big time in upcoming months, so, in my opinion, investors should celebrate interest rates no longer rising as deflationary forces from China spread.

Navellier & Associates owns Ford, (F), Panasonic Corp (PCRFY), VW Group (VWAGY), and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM), in managed accounts. One clients owns Tesla (TSLA), per client request in managed accounts. We do not own General Motors Corp (GM), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Sponsored ADR (TSM), and Lucid Group (LCID). Louis Navellier and his family personally own owns Panasonic Corp (PCRFY), VW Group (VWAGY), and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM), via a Navellier managed account, but do not own Ford, (F), Tesla (TSLA) General Motors Corp (GM), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Sponsored ADR (TSM), and Lucid Group (LCID).

All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

Also In This Issue

Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
Watch the Bond Market for Stock Market Clues

Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
The Stock Market Seasons are Unfolding as Predicted

View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here

About The Author

Louis Navellier

Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at or by requesting a copy by emailing All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.