by Louis Navellier

October 24, 2023

The fact that a second aircraft carrier strike group has been ordered to the eastern Mediterranean, and Air Force jets have been dispatched to the region to deter escalation, demonstrates how tense the situation has become around Israel. The economic impact on Israel and much of the Middle East is unquestionably severe, especially since there are over one million refugees with nowhere to go, as bordering countries like Egypt and Jordan have barred entry to Palestinians. The good news is that in times of uncertainty, Treasury securities are an oasis, so it is still possible that interest rates will decline in a flight to quality.

The U.S. has issued a “do not travel” advisory in Lebanon and is evacuating non-emergency personal after protestors started a fire at the U.S. embassy. President Biden canceled his planned trip to Jordan after the Amman summit was abruptly canceled. Jordan’s Foreign Minister, Ayman Safadi, said the Amman summit was canceled since “there is no use in talking now about anything except stopping the war.”

The Egyptian President and Palestinian leaders were supposed to be at this summit. President Biden was apparently trying to appease some in his own party by attending the Amman summit, which is split over the fate of Palestinian refugees. This Middle East trip, which had been set up by Secretary of State Anthony Blinken turned out to be a disaster for President Biden, since he was shunned by Arab leaders.

In his address to the nation last Thursday evening, the President asked Congress to provide war funding for both Israel and Ukraine. In what was viewed as probably his best address, President Biden said that the world is at an “inflection point in history.” President Biden also said that “American leadership is what holds the world together. American alliances are what keep America safe. American values are what make us a partner that other nations want to work with.” And finally, President Biden concluded that, “To put all that at risk and walk away from Ukraine and turn our backs on Israel – it’s just not worth it.”

Despite being widely praised for his Presidential tone, President Biden did not clarify how much money was needed to fight these two wars to completion, probably because Americans are war weary. U.S. representatives will be meeting with Ukraine in Malta on October 28th and 29th to discuss a “peace formula.” Waning support from Congress, an abrupt end of aid from Poland, and waning support from other EU nations are all taking a toll, causing Ukraine to settle for a favorable peace agreement.

I expect Congress – when it finally elects a permanent House speaker – will provide the aid that the President requested, since U.S. troops have had missiles fired at them in Iraq, Syria and on a Navy ship off Yemen. Although the Navy intercepted these missiles, U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria are in danger.

Last Thursday, the State Department issued a “Worldwide Caution” to all Americans due to “increased tensions in various locations around the world.”  As Iran strives to escalate Israel’s conflict with Hamas, any and all allies of Israel are at risk. And due to Iran’s provocation, crude oil prices continue to rise.

The Biden Administration has also provided up to $500 million in green energy aid to Ukraine, but despite National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan’s recent statement that climate change is an “existential threat” that may end all of humanity, I suspect that the more imminent threat of nuclear war in the Middle East poses a much bigger concern, especially as Iran continues its dangerously inflammatory rhetoric.

U.S. Economic News Was Led by Robust Retail Sales (But Downbeat Confidence)

Last Tuesday, the Commerce Department announced that retail sales rose 0.7% in September, while August’s retail sales were revised up to a 0.8% increase (from 0.6% previously reported). Vehicle sales surged 1% in September, the largest monthly gain in the past four months, and sales at bars and restaurants rose 0.94%, so clearly consumers were out and about last month, spending more money.

Oddly enough, the Conference Board reported that consumer confidence declined to 103 in September (from 108.7 in August), while the “present situation” confidence component rose to 147.1 (up from 146.7 in August), so the confidence decline revolves around expectations, which dropped sharply, to 73.7 in September (down from 83.3 in August). Clearly, consumers are spending now, based on the money in their pockets, versus their sour expectations.  Frankly, it is up to President Biden and our elected leaders to improve the national mood, but…if consumer pessimism persists, President Biden will not be re-elected.

Naturally, there is a lot of added insecurity due to the threat of potential war escalation in the Middle East, political turmoil around the world, soaring interest rates, high energy prices, labor unrest and gobs of other uncertainties. Fortunately, since the U.S. is still a major energy exporter of over four million barrels per day of crude oil, refined products and natural gas (via LNG), the U.S. dollar remains strong, and the U.S. economy is not expected to slip into a recession any time soon. In fact, the Atlanta Fed recently raised its third-quarter GDP estimate up to a 5.4% annual pace, after the September retail sales report.

I mentioned on Bloomberg TV last Thursday, that record energy exports were boosting U.S. GDP growth.

A Bloomberg survey of economists estimated that U.S. GDP growth likely expanded at a 3.5% annual pace in the third quarter, not as high as the Atlanta Fed estimate, but higher than most other estimates.

I should add that China reported a lofty 4.9% annual GDP growth rate in the third quarter. Naturally, this mythical GDP growth rate – amidst plunging exports and imports – doesn’t really add up. Additionally, China’s youth (under 24) unemployment problem persists, and the fact that China is no longer reporting that statistic, tells us that the problem is likely worse. The bottom line is that China is likely exaggerating its GDP growth rate to support the Chinese yuan. I for one, no longer trust China’s GDP statistics.

U.S. unemployment will likely top 4% soon. Philadelphia Fed President, Patrick Harker, recently said that the unemployment rate may rise to 4.5% in 2024, up from 3.8% currently. Harker added that, “this does not mean that I expect mass layoffs.” He also cautioned that a 4% unemployment rate is what economists once called the “natural rate” that theoretically supports stable 2% inflation, which is the Fed’s inflation target. Finally, Harker told a business group in Delaware that, “I do see a steady disinflation under way, and I expect it to continue, with inflation dropping below 3% in 2024 and leveling out at our 2% target.”

Due to the anticipation of higher unemployment by Philly Fed President Harker (and likely by other Fed officials), I think it is safe to say that the Fed is done raising key interest rates for this cycle. However, if the unemployment rate rises due to the UAW strike and other disruptions, the Fed’s high interest rate policy will likely be blamed. Since the Fed does not want to be in the political spotlight, I anticipate key interest rates cuts in early 2024. However, Atlanta Fed President, Raphael Bostic, said on Friday that the Fed might not cut rates until late 2024. If so, the Biden Administration will likely be under pressure as unemployment rates rise, which is not ideal in an election year, so I think rate cuts will begin earlier.

Speaking of elections, right-wing parties in global elections continue to win leadership positions in Ecuador, Germany and New Zealand. Poland is the only exception, electing a centrist party. By far the biggest election news was in Argentina this past weekend, where Javier Milei, a libertarian candidate that looks like Elvis, earned a place in a run-off election with the incumbent, who has run inflation up to 140% on his watch. Milei is important because he wants to get rid of the Argentinean peso and peg Argentina’s currency to the U.S. dollar. The Argentina Central Bank recently raised its key interest rate to 133%, up from 118%, which is evidence that Argentina’s central bank has lost control of the Argentinean peso.

In other news, high interest rates are pushing mortgages up to nearly 8%, so the National Association of Realtors reported last Thursday that existing home sales declined 2% to a 3.96 million annual pace. In the past 12 months, existing home sales have declined 15.4% and are now running at the slowest pace in 13 years (since October 2010). There were 1.13 million homes for sale in September, down 8% from a year ago. At the current annual sales pace, there is only a 3.4-month inventory of new homes for sale.

Clearly, high mortgage rates are systematically restricting existing home sales.  Also supporting this trend, building permits declined 4.4% in September to a 1.47 million annual pace. In the meantime, mortgage demand hit a 28-year low (since May 1995) in the latest week, as 30-year mortgage rates rose to 7.7%.

High Interest Rates are Squelching High-Priced EVs and Other Alternative Energy Sources

One more market that is being choked off by high interest rates is green energy projects, since most such projects are quite expensive and must be financed. Since interest rates are no longer near zero, the payback on new wind and solar projects is becoming increasingly uneconomic. Additionally, Arizona is following the California Public Utilities commission and curtailing solar electricity reimbursement that is sold back to the grid, which discourages solar panel installations. Furthermore, a big offshore wind turbine project in the Northeast has been postponed after six Northeastern governors asked the Biden Administration for aid, since offshore wind turbines are currently forecasted to be cost prohibitive.

High interest rates are also squelching electric vehicle (EV) sales. The Wall Street Journal recently published a great article entitled, “Automakers Have Big Hopes for EVs; Buyers Aren’t Cooperating.”  The latest example that the Journal cited is that Ford is considering canceling a shift at the plant that builds the F-150 Lightening. In the third quarter, Ford’s EV sales plummeted by a whopping 48.5%!

Despite generous price cuts, EVs remain more expensive than internal combustion vehicles. I should add that Ford offered the UAW a 23% pay increase over four years and is now “at its limit” of the wage and benefit increases that it can offer. The expanded UAW strikes at Ford’s Chicago and Louisville plants will be a destroyer of at least 100,000 supplier jobs. Clearly, the negotiations with the UAW are at a crossroads.

In other EV news, Tesla confirmed on Wednesday that they missed analyst sales and earnings forecasts, after confirming that they are struggling to sell more vehicles, due largely to higher interest rates as well as lower operating margins due to price cuts. CEO Elon Musk confirmed that Tesla Cybertruck sales would commence in late November, but also signaled that Tesla’s ambitious truck will not be profitable for at least 18 months. Interestingly, Tesla has not confirmed the price of its Cybertruck, but I expect it to be high, because it is such an imposing vehicle. Overall, Musk seemed cautious on almost everything.

Bloomberg reported that 6.11% of subprime vehicle loans were at least 60-days delinquent in September, the highest delinquency rate since 1994 (when such data collection commenced). The previous high for delinquent subprime auto loans was 5.93% in January. Clearly, many Americans are struggling, despite what Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said at the New York Economic Club last Friday – that the U.S. is a “Very Resilient Economy.” Another example of America’s debt fragility is that 48% of Americans are incurring credit card debt to cover normal household expenses, led by 59% of millennials. Some other interesting indicators are that 6% of credit card holders believe they will never pay off their credit card debt and 29% max out their credit card every month. It is obvious many consumers are struggling with debt.

Regarding the UAW strike, Bill Ford on Monday urged the UAW to end their 32-day strike and reach a new agreement, warning of the growing impact to the automaker and the U.S. economy. Specifically, Ford said, “We can stop this now,” adding that, “I call on UAW colleagues … We need to come together to bring an end to this acrimonious round of talks.” Bill Ford made his appeal in a press conference at the automaker’s historic Rouge assembly plant near company headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan.

UAW President Shawn Fain replied with a statement warning Ford that the union could “close the Rouge” with a strike, and added, “If Ford wants to be the all-American auto company, they can pay all-American wages and benefits.” I think it is safe to conclude that the UAW strike may persist into early 2024.

GM announced it is delaying its electric pickup truck factory in Orion, Michigan “to better manage capital investment while aligning with evolving EV demand.” The slowing demand for EVs, especially EV pickup trucks, influenced GM. Ford has responded to this slumping EV demand for its pickups by making more hybrids. GM may want to follow this strategy, since EV sales in the heartland are weak.

And finally, Bloomberg reported last week that there is a lack of LNG to satisfy world demand in the longer-term transition to a green economy. This essentially means that LNG carriers, like Dorian (LPG) should be able to charge high day-rates for its ships. There is no doubt that burning natural gas is cleaner than burning coal, but global coal consumption continues to steadily rise, since emerging markets like China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam rely mostly on coal for cheap electricity generation.

Navellier & Associates owns Ford Motor Co. (F), and Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG), and a few accounts own Tesla (TSLA), per client request in managed accounts. We do not own General Motors (GM). Louis Navellier and his family own Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) via a Navellier managed account. He does not own Ford Motor Co. (F), Tesla (TSLA), or General Motors (GM), personally.

All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

About The Author

Louis Navellier

Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at or by requesting a copy by emailing All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.