–The Fed, The Media, the American Public, and Gold
by Gary Alexander
June 17, 2025
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) came out last Wednesday, rising only 0.1% in both the headline number and the core number (minus food and energy), and it is up 2.4% over the last 12-months, its lowest rate since February of 2021. The Producer Price Index (PPI), released the next day, came in similarly low.
But that doesn’t matter. The Federal Reserve Board keeps expecting “sticker shock” to return, via high tariffs hitting consumers. Most consumers also expect high inflation (6.6%) over the next year, and now gold has set another new high above $3,450, with silver and the Platinum Group metals forming an Amen Chorus behind gold, leaping up by double digits in early June, partially on fears of higher inflation ahead.
Despite the fifth straight month of low inflation in 2025, last Monday’s Wall Street Journal published two cautionary articles in advance of last week’s inflation reports: The first article was perched on the top of Page 1 of the Business & Finance section, titled: “Inflation Casts Shadow on the Markets,” quoting the University of Michigan’s May consumer sentiment survey, which found that average Americans expect their prices to surge by 6.6% over the next year, up from 6.5% in April. Both numbers are the highest on record since 1981, when inflation was 10.32%. So…U.S. consumers clearly do not believe the CPI data.
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
Even though these lofty 6.6% consumer inflation expectations fly in the face of year-over-year inflation of just 2.4% – the lowest rate since Biden’s first month in office – these expectations can become self-fulfilling if workers begin to demand higher wages, or if businesses raise prices to protect their profits.
The second Journal article from last Monday, June 9 (from their “Investing Monthly” section) profiled a newly retired couple discussing their concerns about inflation, with the husband (Steve) being concerned, and the wife (Karen) was not so worried about rising prices, thinking they can rely on their Cost of Living Allowance (COLA) in Social Security and rising stock markets and lower tax rates, but now they must be concerned about whether these monthly inflation numbers are accurate – due to another Journal article:
On June 4, 2025, the Wall Street Journal produced an article questioning the accuracy of the inflation data (“Economists Raise Questions About Quality of U.S. Inflation Data: Labor Department says staffing shortages reduced its ability to conduct its massive monthly survey”), which says that staffing shortages have handcuffed the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) from making a full survey of nationwide prices each month. In the last inflation report (for April), they said, government statisticians said they had to use a less precise method for guessing price changes than they have in the past, so many economists now say these staffing shortages raise questions about the quality of recent and all upcoming inflation reports.
When asked about this problem, the BLS said, “The CPI temporarily reduced the number of outlets and quotes it attempted to collect, due to a staffing shortage in certain CPI cities” in April. “These procedures will be kept in place until the hiring freeze is lifted, and additional staff can be hired and trained.”
Most people don’t realize that BLS price checkers mostly look at price labels for the same products each month. They don’t monitor “sales” or replacement items, but the same products. So, if they don’t see the brand of jeans they saw last month, they might substitute cargo pants. They basically don’t live in the real world of a family trying to stretch their money by substituting bargain items for overpriced items.
The BLS reports low inflation, but is it accurate? I think so, since we have choices, but most Americans seem to doubt the validity of these numbers, so the market just might soar if we believe the numbers.
The Precious Metals Also Discount Low Inflation Data
In the first half of June, we’ve seen double-digit gains in silver and platinum, with a 5% leap in gold to new record highs, even though the commodity complex, as a whole, has been flat during most of 2025.
Platinum is up due to a projected supply deficit this year, and also due to threatened tariffs, which have resulted in some unusual advance trading and stockpiling of platinum before those expected tariffs take effect, but silver seems to have been catching up to gold in the “inflation hedge” department. Some analysts theorize that the sudden explosion of the “bromance” between the aggressive cost-cutting former DOGE director, Elon Musk, and the more pragmatic Trump team working with Congress on the “one beautiful bill” has sabotaged most of President Trump’s initial promise to cut high deficit spending in his first year. This rift, they theorize, insures high and rising deficits this year, and maybe next year. Such an outlook would virtually guarantee a decline in the dollar and higher inflation, helping gold and silver.
At the same time, this scenario would slow down the economy by keeping interest rates high, and service on the federal debt high, thereby crowding out free enterprise from access to that capital, limiting growth, and perhaps threatening a recession going into the mid-term elections. This opens up a scenario for a return to the “stagflation” of 50-years ago, when gold and silver soared. If so, the very public divorce between Musk and Trump may have sent silver soaring. But then, what if Trump and Musk make up….?
It’s clear that inflation is coming down, but the world (the Fed, the public and gold) don’t see it. So, we may see a major market surge, and perhaps a drop in gold, once the reality of low inflation sinks in.
A Trio Anniversaries in American History – 250, 140 and 95-Years Ago Today
Today marks the anniversary of three red-letter days in American history. Are they still relevant today?
- On June 17, 1775, the Battle of Bunker Hill was the first big battle of the Revolutionary War.
- On June 17, 1885, the Statue of Liberty arrived in New York harbor on a French ship, “Isere.”
- On June 17, 1930, President Herbert Hoover signed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff bill into law.
Before examining that last item in more detail, let me first clear up some myths about the first two:
#1: The Battle of Bunker Hill was mostly fought on Breed’s Hill, the closer of the two hills to the Charles River. Also, the famous patience of our defenders – “Don’t shoot until you see the whites of their eyes” – resulted in a slaughter of the British troops. It was attributed to Colonel William Prescott, but was more likely said by Israel Putnam and others – or not said at all, one of those many stirring post-war legends.
#2: The Statue of Liberty did not come with Emma Lazarus’ poem (“Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor…”) attached. That poem was affixed in bronze in 1903 and does not represent U.S. law, any more than the U.S. Postal Service bronze plaque does: “Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night stays these couriers from the swift completion of their appointed rounds” is not an official motto or policy of the USPS. It is a quote from the Greek historian Herodotus describing an ancient Persian courier service.
With President Trump’s new offer of “Gold Card” U.S. residency visas last week for $5-million, entry into America is no longer favored for the “huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse.”
Now, let us examine the law which has given root to much of today’s Tariff Derangement Syndrome, the Smoot-Hawley law of June 17, 1930. A month before Hoover signed that Bill, over 1,000-economists signed a petition that protested the tariff. Their fears were well founded, as foreign nations retaliated by enacting their own tariffs or quotas on imports, and other measures that stifled global trade in the 1930s.
The Dow fell 11% that week, from 250 to 222. The Dow would not reach 250 again for over 20-years. But the tariff didn’t cause the big drop in the Dow over the next two years, as I’ve shown here before. The Federal Reserve caused that drop by cutting money supply (liquidity) by one-third from 1930 to 1932.
Last week, the Wall Street Journal commemorated the passage of this tariff law by reproducing one of their headlines from that week, 95-years ago, “Senate Passes Tariff Bill, 44-42” (June 14, 1930, below).
The Journal added (on June 9, 2025) that, “The administration expected the Smoot-Hawley tariffs to rake in $107-million a year, according to Journal coverage at the time, a big figure in a $92-billion GDP, but by 1933 the GDP sank to $57-billion.” In a companion piece to that historical survey on June 9, the Journal also wrote, “Stock funds Roared 6% in May 2025 as the ‘Tariff Panic eased for fund investors.’”
Who says we never learn from history? Nearly everyone quotes Smoot-Hawley as a warning these days!
And, in case you forget, the 1930s became a decade of deflation, not inflation, after these tariffs passed.
All content above represents the opinion of Gary Alexander of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Also In This Issue
A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
The Fed’s Search for Phantom Inflation Continues
Income Mail by Bryan Perry
War Assets Rally as Israel Aims to De-Nuke Iran and Liberate Its People
Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
“We Don’t Believe Your Low Inflation Numbers”
Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
No New Highs Until the Middle East Calms Down
Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
How Has the Market Reacted to Recent Middle Eastern Wars?
View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here
About The Author
Gary Alexander
SENIOR EDITOR
Gary Alexander has been Senior Writer at Navellier since 2009. He edits Navellier’s weekly Marketmail and writes a weekly Growth Mail column, in which he uses market history to support the case for growth stocks. For the previous 20 years before joining Navellier, he was Senior Executive Editor at InvestorPlace Media (formerly Phillips Publishing), where he worked with several leading investment analysts, including Louis Navellier (since 1997), helping launch Louis Navellier’s Blue Chip Growth and Global Growth newsletters.
Prior to that, Gary edited Wealth Magazine and Gold Newsletter and wrote various investment research reports for Jefferson Financial in New Orleans in the 1980s. He began his financial newsletter career with KCI Communications in 1980, where he served as consulting editor for Personal Finance newsletter while serving as general manager of KCI’s Alexandria House book division. Before that, he covered the economics beat for news magazines. All content of “Growth Mail” represents the opinion of Gary Alexander
Important Disclosures:
Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.
Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.
None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.
Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.
One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.
ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:
- ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
- An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
- The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
- The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
- Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.
Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.
This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.
FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.
IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades. Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.
Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.
Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.
FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.