by Louis Navellier
April 7, 2026
Early last week, President Trump announced the U.S. would “pause” its strikes on Iran’s energy sector for an additional 10 days, to April 6th, so peace negotiations could take place. He said, “Talks are ongoing and, despite erroneous statements to the contrary, by the Fake News Media, and others, they are going very well.” The stock market liked this news at first. On Tuesday, the market surged on reports President Trump could end the war sooner than expected. Iran reportedly allowed some ships through the Strait of Hormuz, but they also demanded payment from some of those ships. A Kuwait oil tanker was on fire from an apparent missile attack, so passage through the Strait of Hormuz remains precarious for now.
Ideally, a cease-fire will emerge soon, and the Strait of Hormuz could reopen permanently after these negotiations. Since the U.S. shut down Iran’s deep-water port on Kharg Island (accounting for about 90% of its crude oil exports), I suspect this will become the primary leverage the U.S. has on Iran, since Kharg Island is where the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps gets much of its revenue. It will also be interesting to see if our Marines take control of Iran’s deep-water port on Kharg Island. In other words, the “fog of war” persists, while global energy economic issues are becoming the primary reason to implement a cease-fire.
Then, in the president’s nationwide address last Wednesday, he said U.S. military objectives would be completed “very shortly,” but if not, he vowed to hit Iran “extremely hard” and bring the country “back to the stone ages,” which caused crude oil prices to soar, but President Trump said, “Gas prices will rapidly come back down, and stock prices will rapidly go back up” after the U.S. operations in Iran conclude.
Last Tuesday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said other countries need to “be prepared to stand up” and help reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The Trump administration has been very critical of many European allies (including Austria, Britain, France, Italy and Spain) for restrictions on using their military bases and air space, but the UAE is preparing to help the U.S. and its allies to open the Strait of Hormuz by force.
It is safe to say President Trump wants lower crude oil prices going into the mid-term elections, so he will continue to strive to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. It is also imperative we see fertilizer shipments resume, since food prices are expected to remain high if fertilizer cannot boost crop yields during planting season.
Despite America’s energy independence, California is becoming increasingly dependent on imported gasoline from India and South Korea due to its policy of ongoing refinery shutdowns, plus a major pipeline shutdown between Bakersfield and San Pablo Bay. In fact, $8 per gallon gasoline in California is now possible due to the Valero refinery in Benicia shutting down in April, plus the seasonal switch to more expensive summer fuel blends. So ironically, California is becoming more dependent on crude oil from the Middle East, since there are no U.S. pipelines into the Golden State from refineries in Montana, Texas or other states. (Imports of petroleum products to California declined by 26% in the past week).
There are no guarantees during this “fog of war,” and a lot of things can go wrong, so many investors want to remain “on the sidelines” until some war tensions are resolved – but don’t wait too long. We have seen stock markets surge very rapidly when threats of more war diminish. For the time being, the biggest glitch is seeing food and energy inflation soaring, based on the Producer Price Index (PPI), creating the highest imported prices in four years. The March figures for food and energy inflation (released April 10 and 14) are expected to be hideous, as many economists anticipate a 4% annual pace of inflation. This has already influenced Treasury yields after lackluster bid-to-cover ratios at Treasury auctions. Due to this inflation bubble and higher Treasury yields, hopes for more Fed rate cuts have been shelved.
This temporary closure of the Strait of Hormuz hurts Europe, India and Asia far more than the U.S., but if the Strait of Hormuz reopens, I expect global energy prices to decline as a worldwide glut of crude oil re-emerges. Even China needs the U.S. to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, since China gets 80% of its crude oil from the Middle East. The U.S. is increasingly in control of global energy supplies due to its dominance in LNG, refined products and crude oil. Furthermore, the U.S. now has more influence on the major Caribbean, North American and Middle Eastern energy producers. Also, with Asia, Europe and India needing the U.S. and its allies to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, this should help boost the U.S. dollar.
In conclusion, the U.S. remains the premier economic growth engine of the world, so international investors will likely continue to gravitate to the U.S. due to its stronger GDP growth as well as a stronger U.S. dollar. Even if the Trump administration cuts a cease-fire deal with the IRGC, Israel is anticipated to continue to eradicate its most notorious commanders. Furthermore, the IRGC did a good job of ruining relations with its close neighbors in the Middle East, who also may try to eliminate IRGC commanders.
I know a lot of Persians who now live in the U.S., and I can tell you they were excited about President Trump’s call to the Iranian people to rise up and take control of its government. I realize war may reignite if negotiations fail, but the long-term future for the IRGC is poor, since they have no allies in the world.
If this war ends fairly soon, my prediction of 5% GDP growth may occur as soon as the second quarter due to booming U.S. energy and gold exports, which continue to shrink the trade deficit. A shrinking trade deficit and productivity gains, thanks to AI, alone are enough to generate 4% annual GDP growth.
Friday’s Jobs Report Indicates a Strong U.S. Economy
Last Wednesday, ADP reported 62,000 private payroll jobs added in March – much higher than the economists’ consensus expectation of 40,000. These gains were dominated by small businesses (those with fewer than 50 employees) creating 85,000 jobs, while bigger firms lost 23,000 jobs. The end of the Kaiser Permanente healthcare strike added over 30,000 workers, as education and healthcare accounted for 58,000 new jobs. Construction added 30,000 jobs, likely due to the advent of better spring weather. The biggest drag came from trade, transportation and utilities, which accounted for 58,000 net job losses.
Then came the Friday bombshell. Even though the stock market was closed on Good Friday, the bond market was open, and the Labor Department reported a whopping 178,000 new jobs created in March. This was triple the economists’ consensus estimate of 59,000. The unemployment rate also declined to 4.3%, down from 4.4% in February. For the previous two months, however, the February payroll report was revised to a 133,000 job loss (vs. 92,000 first reported) and the January payroll report was revised up to 160,000, from 126,000 previously reported – so these two revisions basically offset each other.
The Labor Department said healthcare jobs rose by 76,000, and construction jobs increased by 26,000, while transportation/warehousing jobs rose by 21,000. Average hourly earnings rose by 0.2% or 5 cents to $32.07 per hour in March and 3.5% in the past 12 months. Overall, Treasury yields rose after the jobs report, so any Fed cuts will likely be postponed, since any fears of a weak job market are now fading.
In other economic news, the Commerce Department announced retail sales rose 0.6% in February, which was higher than the economists’ consensus estimate of a 0.5% increase. Core retail sales, excluding autos, building materials, food and gasoline, rose 0.5% in February, an improvement over a 0.2% increase in January. Auto sales rose 1.2%, a good sign consumers are buying more durable goods, and ten of the 13 categories surveyed reported an increase in February, so this was a very encouraging retail sales report.
Speaking of GDP growth, the Commerce Department reported the U.S. trade deficit rose 4.9% in February to $57.3 billion, less than the economists’ consensus estimate of $62 billion. Specifically, exports rose by 4.2% to $314.8 billion, while imports rose by 4.3% to $372.1 billion. Since energy prices soared in March, it is possible the U.S. trade deficit shrank dramatically in March from booming exports. In fact, during his national address last Wednesday, President Trump reminded the world they could buy crude oil, LNG and refined energy products from the U.S., since we have a large production surplus.
The other good news is the Conference Board announced on Tuesday its consumer confidence index rose to 91.8 in March, up from 91.0 in February. The “present situation” component surged to 123.3, up from 118.7 in February. The “expectations” component declined to 70.9 in March, down from February’s 72.6.
The weather significantly improved in March, helping lift consumer sentiment. The Atlanta Fed now estimates first quarter GDP growth at a 1.9% annual pace, but this may be revised higher in the wake of stronger-than-expected retail sales, smaller-than-expected trade deficit, and other positive economic data.
To round out this list of positive economic news releases, the Institute of Supply Management (ISM) announced on Wednesday its manufacturing index rose to 52.7 in March, up from 52.4 in February, the third straight monthly increase in the ISM manufacturing index. Also, any reading above 50 signals an expansion. Especially encouraging is the production component, rising to 55.1 in March, up from 53.5 in February. The “price” component surged to 78.3 in March, up from 70.5 in February, which signals raw material inflation. In fact, in the past two months, the prices component has risen 19.3 points to its highest level since June of 2022, and 13 of the 16 industries ISM surveyed reported an expansion in March.
Finally, to update the private credit crisis I have been warning you about, according to the Financial Times, the private credit firm Blue Owl has been hit with 40.7% in redemption requests from its Blue Owl Technology Income Corp fund. Another Blue Owl fund, the Blue Owl Credit Income Corp., has been hit with 21.9% in redemption requests. But for now, Blue Owl is sticking to its 5% redemption limit.
KKR, Ares Management, Apollo and BlackRock are also imposing redemption limits. This anxiety over private credit will likely persist, but at this time it appears the industry will continue to avoid investor defaults, as this could deleverage the entire $3 trillion private credit industry. In the event of a private credit default, the Fed may need to step in and slash key interest rates, since banks are big private credit investors. This is why my portfolios have virtually no exposure to private credit or banking stocks.
We are lucky to live in America and not be dependent on much of the rest of the world. Small and mid-capitalization companies are mostly domestic and immune to global distractions. Since about half of the S&P 500’s revenues emanate from outside the U.S., our domestic, small and mid-cap stocks should benefit from institutional investors allocating more money to our fundamentally superior stocks.
Navellier & Associates; do not own BlackRock Inc (BLK), KKR (KKR), Ares Capital Corp (ARCC), Apollo Global Management (APO), and Blue Owl (OWL). Louis Navellier does not own BlackRock Inc (BLK), KKR (KKR), Ares Capital Corp (ARCC), Apollo Global Management (APO), and Blue Owl (OWL).
All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Also In This Issue
A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
What Does President Trump’s New Deadline Imply for Markets?
Income Mail by Bryan Perry
The Next “Two” Big Things
Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
China’s Coming Sinking Spell Implies Rising U.S. Growth
Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
Investors Hope for the Best, but are they Prepared for the Worst?
Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
Some Important New Market Signals Emerging Beneath the Surface
View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here

Louis Navellier
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Important Disclosures:
Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.
Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.
None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.
Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.
One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.
ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:
- ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
- An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
- The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
- The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
- Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.
Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.
This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.
FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.
IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades. Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.
Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.
Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.
FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.