by Ivan Martchev

November 4, 2025

The Wall Street Journal ran a story last Thursday entitled, “U.S. Eyes Striking Venezuelan Military Targets Used for Drug Trafficking,” implying that such strikes against that country are imminent.

My first reaction was that the Trump administration’s strategy of testing the military option against drug cartels in Venezuela is more practical than trying the same strategy against Mexico, which is a far bigger problem when it comes to drug trafficking. The Trump team may also be trying to kill two birds with one stone – toppling President Nicolas Maduro, whose socialist policies have run that country into the ground.

Venezuela’s GDP grew rapidly before 2012, then it fell sharply after Maduro took power in 2013:

Maduras Chart 1

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

It’s also possible that the U.S. is testing its military strategy against drug cartels as far from home as possible, as doing so in Mexico would not be palatable to tens of millions of Americans of Mexican ancestry. And, unlike Mexico, Venezuela is an economic disaster, with GDP per capita declining by 70% from its 2012 peak – the equivalent of an economic depression under President Nicolas Maduro.

I can’t see how prolonged military confrontation is bullish for the U.S. stock market or bearish for the price of oil, but it is impossible to estimate ahead of time how long it may last. It is safe to say, though, that the situation is escalating rapidly. That’s on top of the Ukraine War, which has also escalated lately.

The Ukraine War Has Been Rapidly Escalating

In October, the Ukraine war devolved from a now-postponed Trump-Putin peace summit in Budapest to a rapid escalation of hostilities on the ground – all in a mere two-weeks.  This map, from a U.S. source via ChatGPT’s Atlas, its new and fairly awesome browser, shows a continued encirclement of Pokrovsk, which the Russians view as the key city to their complete takeover of Donbass – the southeastern Ukraine region of mostly Russian speakers – as it is a key railway and highway logistics hub for supplying Ukraine’s frontline. There are reports of huge Russian troop numbers (c. 170,000) surrounding the city.

Pokrovsk Terrain-Map

I think we are about to test the theory that, “If Pokrovsk falls, the Ukrainian frontline collapses,” as the Ukrainians are out-manned, out-gunned and almost completely encircled. The Russian demands, as reported by the Western media, center around the idea of Ukraine giving up the Donbass and Crimea, with Ukraine demilitarizing and agreeing to never join NATO.

Even if Ukraine does not agree to these Russian demands, and all of Donbass falls and the fighting stops along that frontline, Ukraine cannot join NATO in the middle of a military conflict.

Here is how ChatGPT answered a question about the rules of NATO membership during a war:

1.     NATO’s rules

NATO’s founding document, the Washington Treaty (1949), doesn’t explicitly forbid admitting a country that’s at war — but in practice, Article 5 (the collective defense clause) makes it nearly impossible.

If NATO admitted a country currently fighting, the alliance would immediately be obliged to consider that war its own, potentially dragging all 31- members into an active conflict. No existing members would agree to that.

2. Membership process

Joining NATO requires:

  • Unanimous approval by all members.
  • Ratification by each member’s parliament.
  • Fulfillment of military and political criteria (stable institutions, civilian control of the military, ability to contribute to NATO defense).
  • That process takes months to years — impossible during an ongoing war.

3.     Precedents

  • Ukraine (2022–present) applied for NATO membership during the Russian invasion, but NATO made clear that it cannot be admitted while hostilities continue.
  • Similar logic applied to Bosnia and Herzegovina in the 1990s — discussions waited until after peace agreements.

4.     What can happen instead

NATO can (and does) give strong support short of membership:

  • Training, weapons, intelligence, and coordination (as with Ukraine).
  • Security guarantees, or “NATO-aspirant” status.

So, what does all this mean for the stock market? This month, the U.S. might bomb Venezuela, and the Russians might take a key Ukrainian city. If one or both of those events happens, I expect a pullback in U.S. stocks. When the stock market surges rapidly, the way it did in the last 10-days of October, then it tends to consolidate those gains by going sideways for a while. Some call this action backing and filling.

SPX Chart 1

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

Before the 100% China tariff threat on October 10th, we had only three closes below the 20-day moving average (the middle, dotted line) on the S&P 500 since late April. After the 100% tariff threat, we got five closes below the 20-day MA in a row. Clearly, investors got spooked. With the trade war now on the back burner and the situation being smoothed over with China (for now), we’ve seen an aggressive rebound.

My base-case target for the downside in the S&P 500 for the coming consolidation is 6,700 on the cash market – a level where we stood just a couple of weeks ago. If this is just a small correction, the S&P 500 should not spend any meaningful time below its 50-day moving average, which today stands at 6,640.

The S&P 500 has not dipped below its 50-day moving average since late April. At some point, we will get a deeper correction, but if the geopolitical situation does not spiral out of control and the correction is relatively short-lived, then a deeper correction may have to wait till next year.

It still looks like we will trade above 7,000 on the S&P 500 by year-end, as this is the seasonally strongest time of the year, but in the next two-weeks or so, some sideways action is more likely.

All content above represents the opinion of Ivan Martchev of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

Also In This Issue

A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
Companies Boost Earnings…and Cut Jobs

Income Mail by Bryan Perry
Opaque Jobs Data Could Trigger More Fed Rate Cuts

Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
Is Wall Street’s Investment Clock Broken?

About The Author

Ivan Martchev
INVESTMENT STRATEGIST

Ivan Martchev is an investment strategist with Navellier.  Previously, Ivan served as editorial director at InvestorPlace Media. Ivan was editor of Louis Rukeyser’s Mutual Funds and associate editor of Personal Finance. Ivan is also co-author of The Silk Road to Riches (Financial Times Press). The book provided analysis of geopolitical issues and investment strategy in natural resources and emerging markets with an emphasis on Asia. The book also correctly predicted the collapse in the U.S. real estate market, the rise of precious metals, and the resulting increased investor interest in emerging markets. Ivan’s commentaries have been published by MSNBC, The Motley Fool, MarketWatch, and others. All content of “Global Mail” represents the opinion of Ivan Martchev

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.