by Ivan Martchev
September 3, 2025
It seems to me that the Trump administration – mainly the President himself – views the Federal Reserve like the Supreme Court. The more appointees he puts on the Fed Board of Governors, the more likely they will do what he wants, although with the Supreme Court that has certainly not proven to be a guarantee.
This obsession to find a cause for termination in Fed Governor Lisa Cook’s mortgage documents in order to remove her from the Fed Board, seems to be counter-productive, as it is yet another legal soap opera that may end up in the Supreme Court, which has already stated that the Fed Chairman cannot easily be removed. The crux of the argument is that if what Lisa Cook did or didn’t do is cause, it seems to me that it is not a cause for firing until she has been convicted of mortgage fraud, which would take some time.
Furthermore, there is the issue with the Fed funds rate (which the Fed controls) and what it does to the bond market, which the Fed affects but does not control. I think it is best that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent request a meeting with the President and explain to him that lowering the Fed funds rate can backfire and cause a spike in Treasury yields. It is very simple, if the Fed lowers the Fed fund rate as low as 2% and inflation, as measured by the CPI or PCE indexes, begins to trend higher (say, above 3%) later this year or in 2026, it is likely that the 10-year Treasury will go above 5%, which would produce exactly the opposite effect of what the President wants to see – lower interest rate to finance a housing boom and investment boom. The odds are perhaps 50:50 that it will backfire if U.S. inflation begins to trend higher.
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
A case in point is the Japanese bond market. They offered a negative policy rate of -0.10% from 2016 to 2024 (their equivalent of the Fed funds rate). Now, their short-term policy rate is 0.5%. Japanese JGBs (equivalent to Treasurys) have 30-year and 40-year yields of 3.18% and 3.42% and rising. Japan had many years of problems with deflation, but now it has problems with inflation at 3.2% and policy rate of 0.5%.
The President has too many irons in the fire to worry about Federal Reserve personnel and policy. He gets a new Fed chairman next May, and a Lisa Cook firing would only add fuel to the uncertainty fire and worry investors, just as the President seems to be winning a trade war, so far. If he succeeds in everything he has started – except for meddling with the Federal Reserve – he will turn out to be one of the greatest presidents in history, so … this Federal Reserve meddling is completely unnecessary at this juncture.
I think investors still perceive Fed independence to be intact, which is why there has been a muted market reaction so far. If the Lisa Cook removal is successful and there are other such attempts to remove more Fed governors, or the lame-duck Fed chairman, the sell-off in both stocks and bonds could be substantial.
The S&P 500 is Hinting at a Correction
Recent violent rotations out of technology stocks into the value part of the market continue can mean only one thing – a correction. It is not possible to rotate out of the top eight stocks in the S&P 500, which are roughly 36% of the value of the index, and have the S&P 500 go up. On Friday the NASDAQ 100 Index (of which those eight stocks are about 70% of the value of that index) was down 1.22% while the S&P 500 was down 0.64%, which is what a rotation looks like. So, if the rotation continues, which I believe will be the case, the correction in the NASDAQ 100 Index will be sharper, but it will drag down the S&P 500, too.
As I noted last week, the entire Russell 2000 Index is worth less than the #1 company in the S&P 500. In other words, relative strength in the small-cap sector cannot pull the stock market higher.
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
If you look closely, since the rally started in earnest in late April, the S&P 500 has only seen two closes below its 20-day moving average, which came at the end of a shallow correction (green line, above).
If we register a couple of consecutive closes below that 20-day average and the index heads lower from there, it would be a pretty good signal that the correction has started.
Where could the correction end? My base case scenario is the area of the 200-day moving average (red line) give or take 2%, which is what a normal correction looks like. That is without the trade war going into high gear or any other overriding events. I think a possible firing of Fed Chair Jerome Powell is worth a 3% to 5% sell-off in one day in the stock market alone. The firing of more Fed governors for a “cause” that looks nothing more than an attempt to get interest rates lower, faster, could also fuel sell-offs.
We can still make fresh all-time highs if the Fed cuts by 50-basis points and indicates more cuts this year, but ultimately because of these intensifying rotations out of technology some type of correction is coming, in my opinion. My target of the S&P 500 remains a year-end reading near 7,000 as the supply side policies of the Trump administration begin to stimulate the economy.
All content above represents the opinion of Ivan Martchev of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Also In This Issue
A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
The Growing Impact of AI on Business – and Work
Income Mail by Bryan Perry
It’s Prime Time for Considering Convertible Bonds
Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
August Continued the “Stealth” Bull Market for Precious Metals
Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
The President’s Misguided Assault on the Federal Reserve
Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
Things Aren’t Always What They Seem
View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here
Ivan Martchev
INVESTMENT STRATEGIST
Ivan Martchev is an investment strategist with Navellier. Previously, Ivan served as editorial director at InvestorPlace Media. Ivan was editor of Louis Rukeyser’s Mutual Funds and associate editor of Personal Finance. Ivan is also co-author of The Silk Road to Riches (Financial Times Press). The book provided analysis of geopolitical issues and investment strategy in natural resources and emerging markets with an emphasis on Asia. The book also correctly predicted the collapse in the U.S. real estate market, the rise of precious metals, and the resulting increased investor interest in emerging markets. Ivan’s commentaries have been published by MSNBC, The Motley Fool, MarketWatch, and others. All content of “Global Mail” represents the opinion of Ivan Martchev
Important Disclosures:
Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.
Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.
None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.
Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.
One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.
ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:
- ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
- An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
- The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
- The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
- Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.
Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.
This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.
FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.
IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades. Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.
Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.
Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.
FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.