by Gary Alexander
September 3, 2025
August is now history, and stocks shocked many pundits by rising. However, that shouldn’t be the biggest financial news story in August. You wouldn’t know it from the headlines or leading statistical services – but silver rose 10% in August (and 38% for the year), breaching $40 an ounce. Gold rose 5.5% and most importantly breached $3,500 – 100 times its fixed price back in 1970. Platinum rose 6.16% last month and is up a phenomenal 53% for the year, yet everybody is crowing about the much smaller gains in stocks last month (and year-to-date), perhaps just because August is often a negative-month for stocks.
We follow Bespoke Investment Group (BIG) data closely, so I searched their month-ending Bespoke Report last weekend – with its usual wonderful and thorough market summary – but the words “Gold” and “Silver” and “Platinum” were nowhere to be found in BIG’s exhaustive 32-page market summary.
That’s good news to me, since whenever the press puts gold on page one of the most popular newspapers or investment journals, that is often a sign that gold is peaking and due for a sharp correction. Such large price drops happened in 1980 and 2011, after gold hit new highs of $850 and $1,900, respectively, but a collapse soon followed, because most of those past gains came in just two-months, unlike the current rise, which has been gradual over the last two-years – thereby earning my headline, a “Stealth Bull Market.”
The Metals vs. the Markets – August and Year-to-Date 2025
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
As this table shows, platinum has trounced stocks – and even gold – with nearly 53% gains so far this year. Silver is next, at +37.5%, then Gold at +31%. Meanwhile, the four main stock indexes average 8.5%, led by NASDAQ, at +11%, but the precious metals have quadrupled the major stock market indexes.
Stop the Presses! In the three-days since last Friday, gold has gained another $91 (+2.6%) to $3,565; silver gained $1.56 (+3.9%) to $41.76; and platinum gained $65 (+4.8%) to $1,431. While the stock market closed August, last Friday, commodity markets pushed metals higher over the Labor Day weekend.
So, is this a “bubble” market in the making, like some past gold surges? Probably not, due to the gradual nature of the rise and the lack of press coverage, but let’s take a look at gold’s history for a few clues:
Past Gold Bull Markets – the “Real Thing” vs. “Fool’s Gold”
Going back 50-years, gold suffered deep dips in September of 1975 and 1976, reaching $103 in the 1976 dip. Gold then went on to rise 8-fold in less than 3-1/2-years, but the irony of gold’s depressing dip 50-years ago is that Americans were only free to own gold – after over 41-years of gold prohibition – after it had risen from the fixed $35-level to $195 at the end of 1974, when Americans could legally buy gold.
Imagine that bizarre fact: In this “Land of the Free,” Americans were one of very few nations not allowed to own gold – as it multiplied nearly 10-fold (from $20.67 to $195), but as soon as Americans were given legalized access to the metal, it fell by nearly 50%, shaking out any “weak hands” before the run to $850.
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
These charts depict gold as volatile and erratic, but we’ve seen three decade-long gold surges since 1970:
- From $35 to $850 (+2,330%) in the decade from 1970 to 1980
- From $255 to $1,905 (+647%) in the decade from 2001 to 2011
- From $1,055 to $3,565 (+238%) in the decade from 2015 to 2025, as charted below:
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
As this chart shows, the fastest recent rise in gold began in 2023, after two new wars began– in Ukraine and Gaza. Gold’s gains in 2022 were modest and gradual, but the 2023 Hamas invasion of Israel and the quick reprisal against Gaza sent gold soaring from $1,819 just before the Hamas strike to $3,500+ now.
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
Despite that two-year gold gain, this isn’t the kind of gold market bubble we saw in 2011, during the debt downgrade and deficit ceiling debates in Congress. The S&P then fell 19% in three-months, while gold gained 29% in just over two-months. That was a clear overreaction, generating a “reversion to the mean.”
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
This time around, gold’s rise was more gradual, and gold didn’t act like a stock market hedge. This time, since 2015 or 2023, stocks were rising, too, but at a slower pace. But what’s next, in the rest of 2025?
Americans didn’t get on the gold bandwagon until 2025. Most gold buying since 2022 came from central banks, China, India and some other gold-friendly nations. From October 2022 until the start of 2025, North American gold ETF demand was down. GLD (the leading gold bullion ETF) saw over $5-billion in outflows. This year, however, Americans wised up, buying nearly $10-billion of GLD, mostly by April.
I don’t follow, own or recommend gold stocks but the best well-run gold mining firms can leverage the price of gold in earnings. For instance, if mining an ounce of gold costs $2,000 (all costs in), the mining company makes a slim 10% profit with gold at $2,200, but they make a hefty 75% profit at $3,500-gold.
In the quarterly earnings season just past, 26 of the top 34 gold-oriented stocks beat consensus earnings estimates, and those that didn’t “beat” still saw improved profits. After all, the average gold price in the second quarter was $3,286, 15% higher than the average first quarter price of $2,862, so if gold costs $2,000 an ounce to mine (all costs), profit margins rose from 43% in the first quarter to 64%, a 49% gain.
So far this quarter, the average gold price is $3,350, so profits are still rising for the well-run gold miners.
What’s ahead? September is historically a weak-month for stocks (the worst of all 12-months), while September has been among gold’s strongest months, often marking a turnaround or a rally, partly due to global jewelry fabricators preparing their ornate products for the upcoming six-month holiday gift-giving seasons in the most populous and gold-friendly nations on earth, starting with Diwali in India, falling on October 20-22 this year, then Christmas in America and Europe, followed by the Chinese New Year (starting February 6, 2026) Valentine’s Day (February 14) and Ramadan, starting February 28, 2026.
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
August through February is the best gold performance span, giving rise to this gold mantra for traders:
Profit From the Golden Arch
Buy July and Sell in March
Not being a trader, however, I would never follow this advice. Gold gained over 10% in March of 2025!
All content above represents the opinion of Gary Alexander of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Also In This Issue
A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
The Growing Impact of AI on Business – and Work
Income Mail by Bryan Perry
It’s Prime Time for Considering Convertible Bonds
Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
August Continued the “Stealth” Bull Market for Precious Metals
Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
The President’s Misguided Assault on the Federal Reserve
Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
Things Aren’t Always What They Seem
View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here
About The Author
Gary Alexander
SENIOR EDITOR
Gary Alexander has been Senior Writer at Navellier since 2009. He edits Navellier’s weekly Marketmail and writes a weekly Growth Mail column, in which he uses market history to support the case for growth stocks. For the previous 20-years before joining Navellier, he was Senior Executive Editor at InvestorPlace Media (formerly Phillips Publishing), where he worked with several leading investment analysts, including Louis Navellier (since 1997), helping launch Louis Navellier’s Blue Chip Growth and Global Growth newsletters.
Prior to that, Gary edited Wealth Magazine and Gold Newsletter and wrote various investment research reports for Jefferson Financial in New Orleans in the 1980s. He began his financial newsletter career with KCI Communications in 1980, where he served as consulting editor for Personal Finance newsletter while serving as general manager of KCI’s Alexandria House book division. Before that, he covered the economics beat for news magazines. All content of “Growth Mail” represents the opinion of Gary Alexander
Important Disclosures:
Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.
Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.
None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.
Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.
One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.
ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:
- ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
- An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
- The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
- The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
- Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.
Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.
This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.
FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.
IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades. Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.
Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.
Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.
FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.