by Louis Navellier
May 14, 2024
The Fed seems determined to keep kicking the rate-cut can down the road. Last Tuesday, Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari issued an essay saying that the recent inflation data raise questions about whether their monetary policy is restrictive enough to fully return price growth to the central bank’s 2% target rate.
Specifically, Kashkari singled out persistent housing inflation as a sign that the “neutral” interest rate – meaning a rate that neither restricts nor stimulates the economy – may be higher in the short term. Essentially, Kashkari implied that the Fed has more work yet to do to cool inflation when he said, “My colleagues and I are, of course, very happy that the labor market has proven resilient, but, with inflation in the most recent quarter moving sideways, it raises questions about how restrictive the policy really is.”
Kashkari emphasized that the Fed must set policy rates based on where the “neutral rate” is in the short run, saying, “The uncertainty about where ‘neutral’ is today creates a challenge for policymakers.” Even though he is not a voting member on the FOMC, he has raised his long-term neutral rate forecast to 2.5%.
One major impediment to inflation meeting the Fed’s 2% target is high shelter costs (called “Owners’ Equivalent Rent” in the CPI). Ironically, our formerly hot housing markets – like Austin, Texas and much of Florida – were over-built and are now moderating, but that trend is not yet reflected in the monthly CPI.
Zillow Group reported last Tuesday that rents in most major metropolitan areas have risen 1.5 times faster than wages in the past four years. Specifically, according to Zillow, StreetEasy and the Department of Labor, rents rose 30.4% in a five-year period (2019 through 2023), while incomes rose 20.2% over the same period. Three Florida metro areas outpaced the national average, ranging from 36.7% in Jacksonville, to 52.6% in Miami, while wage growth severely lagged rental costs in those regions.
My Case for Cutting Interest Rates Sooner Rather than Later
I would humbly suggest that the Federal Reserve Governors get their nose out of the inflation data alone and take a closer look at the entire array of data – and lives impacted by “higher for longer” interest rates.
Here are five reasons why I think the Fed might want to consider cutting rates sooner – in June or July:
Reason #1: The Fed has a dual mandate – promoting jobs and controlling inflation. To date, they have focused almost 100% on inflation, but the Labor Department reported last week that weekly jobless claims rose to 231,000 in the latest week, up from a revised 209,000 in the previous week. Weekly jobless claims are now running at the highest rate since August 2023, which should concern the “data dependent” Fed, since their dual mandate includes a push toward low unemployment, as well as a low inflation rate.
Reason #2: On the wholesale level, prices are flat or falling. A strong U.S. dollar is deflationary, since it lowers the price of imports and commodities priced in U.S. dollars. Also, with its shrinking population and struggling economy, China’s deflation is spreading to the U.S. due to their overproduction of solar panels, batteries and EVs. As a result, wholesale goods prices have fallen in five of the last six months.
Reason #3: Interest service on the federal debt is too costly: Our soaring national debt – now over $34 trillion – costs nearly $1 trillion per year to finance, and that will grow as our old debt is refinanced. We simply can’t afford to keep paying 4% to 5% on a rising federal debt for an extended period of time.
Reason #4: China continues to export deflation and over-production: China’s exports of steel products have risen 27% this year, but Brazil, Europe and Turkey have started probes to verify if China is dumping low-cost steel. Over-production of many Chinese exports – like batteries, EVs, steel and solar panels – remains an acute problem, so China is expected to continue to export deflation. Within China, consumers are buying a record amount of gold, since there are restrictions on some bank withdrawals, sometimes including withdrawal limits or a longer liquidation schedule, due to their fragile real estate markets.
Reason #5: We could see a deflationary “credit crunch” in the private debt market. We are seeing soaring credit card debts, with credit scores at a four-year low, while the banking system overly relies on – even seems obsessed with – lending based on “credit scores,” without really knowing who their clients are.
As a result, a secondary debt market has boomed, and the private credit industry has soared, creating a second tier of lending for companies and consumers with less-than-ideal credit scores. Currently, the private credit industry is promising yields in excess of 11%, with quick payback rates over just two years.
The next crisis could be triggered by a private credit lender, like Blackstone, restricting redemptions due to defaults. Then, if there is any kind of “credit crunch” with forced asset sales, deflation could spread.
I should add that Blackstone has attracted billions of dollars for direct leveraged lending. This is a good time to remind everyone that the 2008 Financial Crisis was largely triggered by leveraged debt blowing up. This time around, the private credit industry is reportedly utilizing less leverage, but as the industry expands and competes with higher yields, the probability of another “Black Swan” meltdown increases.
Of course, the Fed can counteract the risk of any meltdown by cutting key interest rates, which would reap windfall profits for the private credit industry. So essentially, we are now at an interesting tipping point, and I for one, hope the Fed does not wait for the next credit crisis to begin cutting key interest rates.
Business Insider last Tuesday printed a less than flattering article (“Blackstone’s Big Gamble”) about Blackstone’s commercial real estate fund, BREIT, which buys warehouses, apartments and other commercial real estate assets. BREIT has $114 billion in assets and pays an annual dividend of about 4%. Business Insider cited Craig McCann, a financial analyst who served as an economist at the SEC, who wrote last year that, “Investors should not accept anything Blackstone and BREIT state as truthful.”
Essentially, Blackstone appraises the value of its commercial properties to determine a “net asset value,” or NAV. Since most funds calculate their NAV based on the last securities trade, and BREIT’s financial documents state that Blackstone “is ultimately and solely responsible for the determination of our NAV,” advisors are skeptical of any NAV not audited by an independent registered public accounting firm.
So, Fed Governors, please look at the whole picture – not just consumer inflation – and cut rates soon.
All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Also In This Issue
A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
The Fed Should Cut Rates Before a Credit Crisis Forces Their Hand
Income Mail by Bryan Perry
Why this High-Tech Consumer Driven Economy is About to Hit “Pause”
Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
It’s Time for Trade-Offs More Than Solutions
Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
The Big Inflation Week Starts Today
Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
Why I Think the Market is About to Rally
View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here
Louis Navellier
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Important Disclosures:
Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.
Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.
None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.
Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.
One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.
ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:
- ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
- An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
- The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
- The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
- Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.
Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.
This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.
FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.
IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades. Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.
Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.
Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.
FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.