by Louis Navellier
July 30, 2024
Everyone is cutting rates, it seems – even China. At the start of last week, the People’s Bank of China cut its seven-day repo rate to 1.7% for the first cut in a year. This cut follows a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) document upholding President Xi’s plan to put technology at the center of China’s future, while tolerating slower economic growth, near-term. The expectations for more monetary easing in China remain high, so the Chinese yuan is expected to remain weak, which should help boost China’s exports.
On Thursday, the People’s Bank of China followed up by unexpectedly cutting its one-year lending rate by 0.2% to 2.3%, the biggest cut since April 2020. In response, China’s 10-year government bond yields hit a record low of 2.17% on Friday. This tells us that market rates can force central bankers to respond. As in China, lower U.S. market rates will eventually force the Federal Reserve to cut key interest rates.
Due to a slowing economy in Europe, I expect another European Central Bank (ECB) interest rate cut soon. The Eurozone’s S&P Global Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) just dropped to 50.1 in July, down from 50.9 in June. Germany’s PMI fell below 50 (the line separating growth from contraction) for the first time in three months, an indication of a contraction in the Eurozone’s biggest economy. I should add that Germany has experienced extreme flooding, so Porsche announced that its vehicle production would be reduced for several weeks due to parts shortages. In fact, Porsche said that a shortage of aluminum parts could force it to stop production of some models. Also, high electricity prices continue to suppress growth in Europe, especially southern Europe, which is experiencing an abnormally hot summer.
The U.S. economy is also slowing, giving the Fed reason enough to cut rates this week. Last Thursday, the Commerce Department announced that June durable goods orders plunged 6.6%. That came as a big surprise since economists were expecting a large increase after the previous four months of increases. The culprit was a 20.5% plunge in transportation orders due to weak orders for commercial planes. Excluding the volatile transportation sector, however, durable goods orders rose by a more respectable 0.5% in June.
Turning to the Fed’s favorite inflation indicator, we have even a firmer case for cutting rates now. The Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) index rose just 0.1% in June. The core PCE, excluding food and energy, rose 0.2% in June and 2.6% in the past 12 months. All of these numbers are in line with the economists’ consensus expectation, so Treasury yields declined a bit in the wake of the PCE report.
This improvement in the PCE is expected to cause the Fed to at least issue a dovish Federal Market Open Committee (FOMC) statement on July 31st and a key interest rate cut on September 18th – at the least. With the 10-Year Treasury rate at 4.193% and the 2-year at 4.385%, there is no reason to keep the Fed funds rate a full point higher – in a range of 5.25% to 5.50% – for the last full year, since July 26, 2023.
Two major Fed officers – one a former Fed New York President, one a current Chicago Fed President – came out last week in favor of cutting rates sooner rather than later. First, the former New York Fed President Bill Dudley came out on Wednesday with a powerful Bloomberg Opinion article entitled, “I Changed My Mind. The Fed Needs to Cut Rates Now,” in which he said, “The facts have changed, so I’ve changed my mind. The Fed should cut, preferably at next week’s policy making (FOMC) meeting.”
Dudley elaborated, saying that, “wealthy households are still consuming, thanks to buoyant asset prices and mortgages refinanced at historically low long-term rates. But the rest have generally depleted what they managed to save from the government’s huge fiscal transfers, and they’re feeling the impact of higher rates on their credit cards and auto loans. Housing construction has faltered, as elevated borrowing costs undermine the economics of building new apartment complexes. The momentum generated by Biden’s investment initiatives appears to be fading.” Dudley also cited several reasons why the labor market is deteriorating as reasons why the Fed should cut rates at the FOMC meeting on July 31st.
Echoing Dudley, Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee said that the June inflation statistics make him more confident that price pressures are easing in a way that supports the Fed lowering key interest rates. Specifically, Goolsbee said, “You only want to stay this restrictive for as long as you have to, and this doesn’t look like an overheating economy to me.” Goolsbee also asserted that unemployment is higher, new hiring is cooling and delinquencies on certain consumer debts are rising, which argue for rate cuts.
Consumer inflation is cooling off in large part because shelter costs, based on owners’ equivalent rent, finally decelerated to a 0.2% annual pace. Last Tuesday, the National Association of Realtors reported that median home prices are still rising, reaching a median of $426,900 in June, up 4.1% in the past 12 months. Rising prices tend to limit sales, so existing home sales declined 5.4% in June to an annual pace of 3.89 million. There were 1.32 million homes for sale at the end of June, up 3.1% from May and up a whopping 23.4% from a year ago. The inventory of existing home sales now represents a 4.1-month supply, the highest level in over four years (since May 2020). This should slow home price growth.
Another indicator of slowing home sales is the Commerce Department’s report that new home sales declined 0.6% in June, following a nearly 15% decline in May. Single-family home sales are now running at a 617,000 annual pace. The inventory of unsold new homes has risen to 476,000, which represents a 9.3-month inventory at the current annual sales pace. This is the largest inventory of new homes for sale since 2008, so some price discounts are anticipated in the upcoming months. The Federal Reserve can obviously provide some welcome relief to buyers and sellers alike with an interest rate cut this week.
The Wall Street Journal recently reported that tenant evictions in the past 18 months are up over 35% in six major urban areas, according to Princeton’s Eviction Lab Research unit. Also, the Philadelphia Fed reported on Thursday that 60-day past due credit card balances rose to 2.6%, up from a low of 1.1% back in 2021. The 30- and 90-day past due amounts are at their highest level since 2012, at 3.56% and 1.89%, respectively. I suspect that these statistics are getting the Fed’s attention, as they cry out for a rate cut.
The auto market is also suffering from repossessions due in part to high interest rates. Cox Automotive reported that vehicle repossessions are up 23% over last year. That is a substantial jump in repossessions and clearly a sign that many families are struggling to make ends meet. High interest rates are suppressing both new and used vehicle sales. Until there is interest rate relief, vehicle sales will be under pressure.
As renter evictions and mortgage defaults rise, the Fed needs to step in and start cutting key interest rates sooner rather than later! Last Wednesday, the Blackstone Mortgage REIT (BXMT) cut its dividend by 24% due to higher defaults, as borrowers struggle to make payments and/or refinance their loans. BXMT had held its quarterly dividend at 62 cents since 2015 but it will now slash its dividend to 47 cents.
The Treasury yield curve is now the least inverted it has been in two years, as a flight to quality has pushed down short and intermediate Treasury yields, so now seems to be the time for the Fed to act.
Most November Votes Come Down to Policy Differences
The upcoming Chicago Democratic National Convention (DNC) could be interesting. President Joe Biden reluctantly announced that he will be stepping down after calls from within the Democratic Party leaders intensified and the polls showed that he could not get re-elected, so Biden endorsed Kamala Harris as his replacement. The Harris campaign quickly announced that they have a majority of delegates to secure the nomination, but 400+ Super Delegates have more voting power at the DNC, so if Harris polls turn sour by mid-August, it remains uncertain whether or not she will win over the powerful DNC Super Delegates.
A case in point happened when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed Congress last Wednesday, but no one from the Biden Administration was present to greet him. Since Israel is the most important U.S. ally in the Middle East, the absence of Kamala Harris could hurt her with Jewish voters.
Thanks to Trump’s selection of J.D. Vance as Vice President and Elon Musk’s endorsement, Silicon Valley is warming up to the Trump/Vance ticket after overwhelmingly supporting Democrat candidates in recent election cycles. The fact that Vance worked for some Silicon Valley elites like Peter Thiel helps, as does the fact that the Trump Administration did not aggressively sue big technology companies, which the Biden Administration is now doing. Even Mark Zuckerberg, who helped finance Biden’s 2020 victory, said that Donald Trump’s immediate reaction after being shot was “badass” and inspiring.
The energy sector is one of the biggest divides between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. Unleashing the U.S. energy sector is expected to mark the first 90 days of a new Trump Administration. Part of their policy differences involves Trump freeing up fossil fuel exploration vs. Harris’s over-emphasis on green sources. Another factor is ending the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, freeing up those energy areas.
Russian oil exports from its two main ports of Primorsk and Ust-Luga have declined 41% in the past month. These Russian cuts may be an attempt to comply with recent OPEC+ production cuts. However, Russian crude oil exports have fallen 620,000 barrels per day since April and are now running at the slowest pace in seven months. Britain recently sanctioned tankers that move oil from Russia, including some that are part of its “shadow fleet.” As a result, over 60 tankers that carry Russian crude are now sanctioned. These new sanctions have caused refineries in India to refuse deliveries of Russian crude oil.
Candidate Trump wants to end Biden’s electric vehicle (EV) mandate, partly to save Detroit’s Big 3, which have struggled to make money on EVs. The on-shoring of battery plants has also stalled, especially since there is a glut of cheap LFP batteries from China. LG Energy Solution is slowing the construction of its third battery plant with GM in Michigan. Specifically, Bloomberg reported that LG Energy Solution sent a text message that said it is “adjusting the speed of overall investment” and “seeking ways for the flexible operation” of its battery plants. Also notable is that SK On, which is South Korea’s third largest battery manufacturer and a supplier to Ford and Hyundai, declared a substantial quarterly loss. SK On has two battery plants in Georgia in conjunction with a joint venture with Hyundai, plus it had plans to build three more battery plants with Ford in Kentucky and Tennessee. Since the money to build these plants will utilize funds from Biden Administration subsidies, I suspect that due to a global battery glut and the probability of a Trump victory this year, SK On will not build these additional battery plants in the U.S.
Speaking of EVs, Tesla announced its second-quarter results on Tuesday. Even though its sales were better than analyst expectations, the company missed analyst estimates by 16.1%, its fourth straight quarterly miss. CEO Elon Musk told analysts on a conference call that new competitors “have discounted their EVs very substantially, which has made it a bit more difficult for Tesla.” Interestingly, Tesla posted record regulatory tax credits of $890 million last quarter, which is nearly triple what these tax credits were a year ago. Finally, Tesla said that it was on track to produce new vehicles, including more affordable models, in the first half of 2025. In the end, Tesla stock was hindered by another delay in the Robo-taxi and concerns about the competitiveness of its new low-cost EVs in 2025. Last week, I wrote an article and commented on this “Elon Musk has his Mojo back. Tesla needs some of that in its earnings.”
In conclusion, the stock market still has a lot of momentum from the strongest earnings for the S&P 500 in over two years, plus improving market breadth. If I were running the Fed, I would cut key interest rates on July 31st and also on September 18th. However, the Fed will most likely issue a dovish FOMC statement, in order to set up an impending key interest rate cut on September 18th. After the November Presidential election, I expect another Fed rate cut on November 7th. These key interest rate cuts will essentially represent a “turbo boost” for the overall the stock market, to propel it significantly higher.
If Trump scores an overwhelming electoral college victory, he will have a pro-business mandate that should help the stock market surge in anticipation of robust economic growth in 2025 and beyond.
Navellier & Associates, a few accounts own Tesla (TSLA), per client request in managed accounts. We do not own Ford Motor Co. (F), General Motors (GM), or Hyundai (HYMTF). Louis Navellier and his family do not own Ford Motor Co. (F), Tesla (TSLA), Hyundai (HYMTF), or General Motors (GM), personally.
All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Also In This Issue
A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
The Case for Cutting U.S. Interest Rates This Week
Income Mail by Bryan Perry
A Bottom in Commercial Office Property Values Now Looks Further Out
Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
The American “Income Gap” is Much Smaller Than Advertised
Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
The Yen Strikes Back
Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
Managing Change in Markets Can Be Stressful – But Profitable
View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here
![Louie1](https://navellier.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Louie1.jpg)
Louis Navellier
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Important Disclosures:
Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.
Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.
None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.
Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.
One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.
ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:
- ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
- An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
- The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
- The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
- Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.
Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.
This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.
FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.
IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades. Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.
Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.
Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.
FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.