by Louis Navellier

February 24, 2026

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling on Friday said President Trump’s “use of emergency powers” without Congressional authorization are prohibited, but Wall Street celebrated the move. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, in part, “Had Congress intended to convey the distinct and extraordinary power to impose tariffs, it would have done so expressly.” Although President Trump responded by saying “their decision is incorrect,” he added, “It doesn’t matter, because we have very powerful alternatives.” Trump initially announced a 10% across-the-board tariff on imports, and a day later he raised those new tariffs to 15%.

The Supreme Court did not address whether the federal government would have to pay back the tariff revenue it already collected. Since the Court offered no remedy to enforce its decisions, the lower federal courts will now need to enforce the Supreme Court’s ruling, which means companies which have paid $170-billion in tariffs will have to request their money back via the federal courts. It’s also important to recall these tariffs were originally raised in an effort to try to force our leading trading partners to lower their own high trade barriers, and America needed to remedy these unfair trade practices for a long time.

So, in this 250th anniversary year of our Declaration of Independence, America is telling the world we need not depend on their trade if they continue to keep their own barriers high. Secretary of State Marco Rubio gave a stirring speech at the Munich Security Conference touching on Europe’s need to bring down trade barriers. Rubio stressed Western values the U.S. and Europe share, plus our NATO alliance.

Many European officials appreciated Rubio’s speech but did not announce any tariff reversals and said they intend to stick to their NetZero carbon emission goals. They also demanded to be at the negotiating table for any peace talks between Ukraine and Russia. French President Emmanuel Macron has openly accused President Trump of trying to break up the EU, but Macron needs Trump as an external opponent since Marine Le Pen now controls the French Parliament. EU elections in 2027 are likely to elect many anti-EU parties, so it appears Macron is just trying to stir up his base – and other traditional EU parties.

There is now a growing rift between France and Germany, destabilizing the EU. Germany and Italy have formed a near-term alliance, since their respective manufacturing industries do business with each other. Poland’s economic growth has made it the new star in the EU. Ironically, a Polish representative at the Munich Security Conference says his nation agrees with the EU’s Net Zero goal, which is a bit ironic since Poland burns a lot of coal for electricity. However, Poland’s cheaper electricity is helping it grow.

The Wall Street Journal described the relationship between the U.S. and Europe as a “Marriage of Convenience.” Despite Rubio’s warmer tone (than J.D. Vance’s) of respecting European disagreements, with Europe being excluded from the Ukraine/Russian negotiations, plus the U.S. quest to buy Greenland from Denmark, still has many European allies grumbling, but Secretary of State Rubio has been better received than the U.S. President or Vice President with his eloquent yet respectful speeches there.

On the other major war front now, Iran has apparently proposed a pause in its uranium enrichment and even proposed possible business deals with the U.S. Naturally, this is not enough to meet U.S. demands, so President Trump said, “I don’t think they want the consequences of not making a deal,” and added “They want to make a deal.” Vice President J.D. Vance said, “It was very clear (President Trump) has set some red lines the Iranians are not yet willing to acknowledge and work through.” Due to progress so far, gold prices moderated a bit, even though any final deal between Iran and the U.S. seems unlikely.

Iran conducted some military operations to shut down part of the Strait of Hormuz, which looked like a threat of how Iran could cut off critical crude oil supplies. The U.S. and Iran are expected to meet again, and those negotiations will be very closely watched. In the meantime, the U.S. has built up its largest show of forces in the region since the Gulf War. The U.S. is reportedly ready to strike Iran within days if negotiations stall. This caused crude oil prices to rise on anticipation of possible military action.

Inflation Keeps Slowly Retreating – Giving the Fed Room to Cut Rates

Last week, the Fed’s most-watched inflation index, the Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE), was released, up 0.4% in December and 2.9% in the past 12-months. The core PCE, excluding food and energy, rose 0.4% and 3% in the past 12-months and consumer spending also rose 0.4%.

Treasury yields declined to their lowest rates this year in the wake of the slower growth in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), now running at a 2.4% annual pace, so speculation about another Fed key interest rate cut is reviving. However, Kevin Warsh will not take over the Fed until May, if he is confirmed by the Senate. Since Warsh has called for a closer relationship between the Fed and Treasury Department, this is raising speculation of yield curve management and open market actions by the Fed which would apparently be coordinated between the Fed and Treasury Department. On Fox Business News, President Trump told Larry Kudlow if Warsh “does the job he’s capable of,” then “we can grow at 15%…or more.”

The minutes from the January Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting revealed the vast majority of voting members want to hold interest rates steady. Since then, the Treasury yield curve has become the steepest in four-years. Nonetheless, the FOMC minutes said, “The risk of more persistent inflation remained.” Furthermore, according to those minutes, most Fed officials worried the progress on getting inflation down to their 2% target “might be slower and more uneven than generally expected.”

In other economic news, the Commerce Department announced durable goods orders declined 1.4% in December, better than the consensus estimate of a 2% decline. Excluding volatile transportation orders (down 5.3%), durable goods orders rose by 0.9% in December so, overall, this was a positive report.

The other big news last week also came from the Commerce Department: The U.S. trade deficit rose to $70.3-billion in December and $901.5-billion for all of 2025. In December, imports surged 3.6% to $357.6-billion, while exports declined 1.7% to $287.3-billion. Economists were expecting the trade deficit to be only $55.8-billion in December, so this was a big miss, causing economists to lower their fourth-quarter GDP estimates. In fact, in the wake of the announcement of the December trade deficit, the Atlanta Fed lowered its fourth-quarter GDP estimate to 3%, down from its previous estimate of 3.6%.

The Commerce Department also announced its preliminary estimate of fourth-quarter GDP growth at 1.4%, substantially below estimates of 2.8%. Federal government spending declined 16.6% last quarter, due largely to the federal government shutdown, a 1% drag on overall GDP growth. A higher-than-expected trade deficit was also a drag on GDP growth. For all of 2025, GDP rose 2.2%. Treasury yields meandered lower after the GDP report, which should raise the odds of another Fed key interest rate-cut.

In closing, I should probably update you on my major concern over a potential future private credit bubble. One firm in the field, Blue Owl, recently announced permanent restrictions on investors from exiting one of its retail funds, namely Blue Owl Capital Corp II. This news caused the prices of Ares Management, Apollo Global Management, KKR, Blackstone and TPG to sell off. Complicating matters further, BlackRock slashed the value of some of its private credit holdings in the past month.

The former head of Pimco, Mohamed El-Erian, asked, “Is this a ‘canary-in-the-coalmine’ moment?”  Since private credit is now a $3-trillion per year industry and does a lot of the lending the Dodd Frank bill made difficult for banks, businesses have now created this “shadow banking system.”  In the event of a private credit “Black Swan” event, the Fed may have to step in to provide liquidity to these lenders.

As we near the end of February, experience tells us life goes on, despite all these threats, and we may see the national mood turn progressively better as 2026 unfolds. First, investors are expected to cheer up in the Spring as it warms up after a brutally cold and snowy winter. Second, when the Fed meets in May for their Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting and Kevin Warsh takes over as the new Fed Chair, the FOMC is expected to cut key interest rates and provide guidance for additional rates cuts. Finally, S&P 500 earnings have been growing faster than sales for 10-straight quarters, which signals a rise in operating margins and productivity, so earnings growth should stay in double-digits for all of 2026.

Since 2026 is a mid-term election year, President Trump is expected to become the “cheerleader in chief” to explain how he has tamed inflation and sparked rising GDP growth. Naturally, President Trump is trying to retain Republican control in the House, which will be a tall task, since incumbent presidents usually lose several House seats in mid-term elections. Nevertheless, if gasoline prices remain low and prosperity rises, President Trump may be able to pull off a historic mid-term election victory. Although he has many outspoken critics, there is no doubt he is striving to boost GDP growth and prosperity.

Whether GDP growth hits 5%, as I predicted over a year ago, or 6% as Howard Lutnick has predicted, there is no doubt 2026 will go down as the strongest year for GDP growth since at least 1984. With an accommodative Fed cutting key interest rates due to AI productivity gains, the stock market is expected to gather even more momentum in the upcoming months, so I hope you enjoy the ride – and have some fun!

All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

Also In This Issue

Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
A “Tariff-ic” Week for the Stock Market

Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
This Sector Rotation May End Soon

View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here

About The Author

Louis Navellier
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER

Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.