by Louis Navellier

December 31, 2024

Last week, I brought you my first three predictions for 2025. Here are my final three predictions.

Prediction #4: S&P 500 Earnings Will Grow by Double Digits in 2025

The latest back testing of my Stock Grader and 8-factor Fundamental model confirmed that the breadth and power of the overall stock market is expanding. This is indicated by the fact that the top 65% of my 8-factor fundamental model now perform well, up from the top 55% in the previous quarter.

Also, the S&P 500’s earnings are accelerating their gains from 8.4% in the third quarter to over 10% for the next three quarters. I am especially excited about stocks with: (1) positive analyst earnings revisions, (2) robust operating margin expansion, and (3) accelerating sales growth expected in the first half of 2025.

The market will also be fueled by the fact that M2 money supply continues to grow. Overall stock market appreciation is highly correlated to M2 money growth, which is money in checking accounts and up to 1-year deposits. There is also evidence that the “velocity of money” is increasing. When consumers are out and about (spending), the velocity of money and prosperity rises. The advent of Trump 2.0 is boosting the velocity of money since uncertainty has ended with his “drill baby drill” and other pro-business policies.

For 2025, the companies I like most will be helping to expand the utility grid and cloud computing. Later in 2025, stocks benefitting from a natural gas renaissance should become more dominant. Other than that, I wish I could tell you that 2025 is a year when you can buy ETFs in a single sector, but the truth is that this is still a market of “every stock for itself.” There are big winners in my Stock Grader system (like A-rated Nvidia) in the same sector with stocks I would sell, like D-rated Advanced Micro Devices and F-rated Intel. There are similar discrepancies in almost every sector, so stock picking remains vital in 2025.

My recent back testing of the Stock Grader confirmed that stocks with an A-quantitative grade and a B or better fundamental grade have had the best potential performance. These are the stocks that are typically characterized by: (1) persistent institutional buying pressure (which creates an Alpha and lower Standard Deviation), (2) strong forecasted sales growth, (3) positive analyst earnings revisions, (4) operating margin expansion, and (5) a strong earnings surprise history. Now that a broader array of 20% of stocks are leading the overall market, up from just 5% a few months ago, the breadth and power of the overall stock market is improving. With a strong dollar, we are also focusing more on domestic U.S. companies.

Prediction #5: Trump’s Threatened Tariffs Will Not Be Permanent or Inflationary (to Americans)

As far as Trump’s proposed tariffs are concerned, these are not permanent tariffs, or “consumer taxes.” This is how President-elect Donald Trump negotiates, so when candidate Trump said that he intended to levy 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico, plus boosting tariffs by 10% on China in retaliation for illegal immigration and drug trafficking, that was only designed to guilt Canada and Mexico to force them to secure their respective borders. Trump stressed that these tariffs on Canada and Mexico would remain in place “until such time as drugs, in particular Fentanyl, and illegal aliens stop this invasion of our country.”

Trump likes to fight economic wars rather than military wars by making our trading partners feel uncomfortable. He wants to negotiate from strength, so if Canada and Mexico, seal their respective borders to stop the flow of illegal drugs and aliens, then he would not impose these 25% tariffs.

As a result, I suspect that Canada and Mexico will cooperate with Trump 2.0; otherwise, the economic cost of 25% tariffs could destroy their respective economies. In fact, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has already visited Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago to discuss border security and trade, while Mexico’s new President, Claudia Sheinbaum, has also pledged cooperation on immigration. China could be more problematic, but President-elect Trump has invited Chinese President Xi to his inauguration, so he clearly wants to engage in diplomatic negotiations with China. Even though Chinese President Xi is not expected to attend, Trump has sent out an important signal that he wants to mend fences with China.

As for Europe, the trade deficit with the European Union (EU) surged 8.9% in September to $13.18 billion, according to Eurostat. All the talk about tariffs hurting the U.S. are largely emanating from Europe, since Germany is in a recession and the EU is scared that if they do not cut their tariffs to low U.S. levels (e.g., 2.5% on imported vehicles), then Trump 2.0 may raise tariffs to high EU levels. ECB President Christine Lagarde, who was openly hostile to Donald Trump before he was elected President, has been leading the anti-tariff crusade, despite the fact that the EU imposes larger tariffs than the U.S.

Prediction #6: A Peace Dividend in 2025 Will Deliver Greater Global Prosperity, and More Trade

President-elect Donald Trump ran on promptly ending the war between Russia and Ukraine. Now that an estimated million people have been killed or maimed in the past three years, this brutal conflict has decimated the number of young men in both Russia and Ukraine. Now that the third winter of this war has begun, fighting has curtailed some, despite the Biden Administration’s approval to hit Russia with longer range missiles, install more landmines and continue to use cluster bombs, but this winter would be a perfect time for a ceasefire and then an end to the war before its third anniversary in late February.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is seeking a peace deal with Russia, but both Britian and the U.S. asked Zelenskyy to reject any peace deal with Russia. The Biden Administration is obviously thoroughly embarrassed by this war between Russia and Ukraine. Although there are losers in most wars, both Russia and Ukraine will likely claim to be winners. Russia clearly captured more territory and Ukraine put up a much better defense than most military experts anticipated. Nonetheless, President-elect Trump will strive for Russia and Ukraine to agree to a cease fire and to agree to a peace agreement.

The Middle East war is far more complex, with multiple national players. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his family fled to Russia as rebel leaders took over Syria, creating an unknown new power and questions of how these rebels will lead Syria. The Financial Times reported that Assad raided the Syrian central bank and fled with an estimated $250 million in $100 bills and two tons worth of 500-euro notes.

The key to lasting peace in the Middle East is to expand the Abraham Accords, wherein Arab countries pledge to support Israel’s right to exist. If the new Trump Administration can convince Saudi Arabia to join the Abraham Accords, it will help promote peace in the Middle East and further isolate Iran.

I’ve also reported on recent unrest in South Korea and Brazil facing President-elect Trump. The bottom line is that wars are expected to end soon, and peace is expected to prevail based on the assurance from the U.S. that all countries have the right to grow and prosper. The Trump Administration knows that wars waste an incredible amount of money, stifle economic growth and stunt countries demographically – as Russia and Ukraine will soon discover, when they notice their shortage of able-bodied young men.

China has been fairly quiet on the military front recently. They are masters at winning economic wars more than fighting military wars. Chinese President Xi has recently been purging the leadership of its military, so I do not expect that China will invade Taiwan or undertake any serious military action, so if just one or both of these existing global hot spots reach a peaceful resolution in 2025, a peace dividend, similar to the end of the Cold War in 1991 can provide exceptional market gains in the years ahead.

Update on My Previous Three Predictions

My first three predictions, in brief, were that: (1) the Fed would cut rates four times in 2025, not just the two times they indicated on December 18, (2) GDP would likely grow 4% in 2025, and (3) natural gas would retake its natural place as a leading energy source, instead of being flamed-out or being banned.

For the first prediction, on interest rate cuts, the Fed will be forced to cut rates due to falling interest rates around the world, causing an international flight to U.S. Treasuries, which will drive rates lower. For example. China’s 10-year government bond yields fell below 1.7% last week, the lowest level in two decades. These low global yields will naturally cause capital flight to the U.S. and since the Fed never fights market rates, I am confident that the Fed will cut its key interest rates four times in 2025.

A strong U.S. dollar will also help to reduce the prices of imported goods. The Fed’s favorite inflation indicator, the Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) index, rose only rose 0.1% in November and just 2.4% in the past 12 months, the smallest monthly increase in the PCE since May. The core PCE, which excludes food and energy, rose just 0.1% in November and 2.8% in the past 12 months. When shelter costs (owner’s equivalent rent) are stripped out, PCE inflation is running at the Fed’s 2% target rate.

However, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell’s unfortunately defeatist comment – that the Fed’s year-end inflation forecast has “kind of fallen apart” – did not inspire any confidence. That caused a pause in the Santa Claus rally with a grossly overdone sell-off, wiping out all the stock market gains since the big Presidential election rally. Fortunately, a late Santa Claus rally was sparked by the tame November PCE inflation report, so the stock market is rallying into Christmas and should also rally into the New Year.

One other reason the Fed should cut key interest rates four times in 2025 is the Financial Times reported that U.S. companies are now defaulting on junk loans at the fastest rate in four years. The default rate in the leverage loan market rose to 7.2% in October. Many companies have been refinancing low-yielding loans originated during the Covid era and are increasingly struggling to pay higher interest rates.

Since banks are notorious for selling these leveraged loans to private credit firms, the possibility of a major default in the $2 trillion private credit industry is rising fast. As I have warned here in the past, a private credit default could trigger another “Black Swan” event that could freeze the private credit industry. All this could possibly be averted if the Fed aggressively cut key interest rates more in 2025.

While it is true that the 10-year Treasury bond yield has risen to 4.62% last week, up from 4.17% on December 6th, I mentioned on Fox Business last week that incoming Treasury Security Scott Bessent should be able to manage the Treasury auctions far better than the current Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen. In the meantime, I suspect that the bond vigilantes are annoying President-elect Trump, so it will be up to incoming Treasury Security Scott Bessent to help push Treasury yields lower, with Fed rates following.

My second prediction, about 4% GDP growth, doesn’t look likely now, but most economic statistics look backwards, based on Biden’s policies, not forward. For instance, the Commerce Department reported last week that durable goods declined 1.1% in November due largely to a 12% decline in defense orders. Excluding transportation, durable goods orders declined by a more modest 0.1%. The good news is non-defense capital goods orders rose by 0.7% and have risen 2.1%, so there is a “green shoot” in this report!

There is more good news: MasterCard Spending Pulse reported that holiday shopping between November 1st and December 24th, excluding auto sales, rose 3.8% vs. the same period a year ago. Consumer spending rose 3.1% during the same period a year ago, according to MasterCard. Some other details from MasterCard were that online spending rose 6.7% (vs. 6.3% a year ago) and in-store spending rose 2.9% (compared with 2.2% a year ago). Overall, it was a solid holiday shopping season in multiple categories.

My third prediction, on natural gas, gained credence last week on news that Qatar is threatening to cut off LNG shipments to the euro-zone over legislation that will penalize companies that fail to meet EU criteria on carbon emissions, plus strict human rights and labor laws. Frankly, this is a great opportunity for the U.S. to step in to fill in any void if Qatar cuts off LNG shipments to Europe. Already, Russia is exporting more LNG to the euro-zone than the U.S. (since May), because the Biden Administration is striving to restrict LNG expansion due to his own environmental concerns. Frankly, the U.S. scores a lot higher than Qatar or Russia on carbon emissions, labor and human rights, so LNG exports should rise under Trump!

And finally, last Thursday, The Wall Street Journal published a fine article on how the U.S. is expected to become increasingly dominant in LNG exports under Trump 2.0. The U.S. is already the largest LNG exporter, but we should become increasingly dominant in the upcoming years, replacing all the Russian LNG exports to Europe. The Biden Administration’s Energy Department warned recently that “unfettered exports” of natural gas would boost global emissions, but natural gas is far cleaner than coal, so it is good and “clean” to replace coal with natural gas for electricity generation in more markets around the world.

Navellier & Associates owns Nvidia Corp (NVDA), in managed accounts. We do not own Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD), or Intel Corp. (INTC). Louis Navellier and his family own Nvidia Corp (NVDA), via a Navellier managed account, and Nvidia Corp (NVDA), in a personal account. He does not own Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD), or Intel Corp. (INTC), personally.

All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

Also In This Issue

Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
2024 Was Great, But What About 2025?

Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
Holiday Trading Days Mean…Next to Nothing

View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here

About The Author

Louis Navellier
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER

Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.