by Louis Navellier
November 25, 2025
Last week’s market volatility mostly surrounded the anticipation, announcement and then over-reaction to Nvidia’s quarterly announcement and guidance. On Wednesday, Nvidia announced that its third-quarter revenue surged by 62.4% to $57-billion, compared with $35.1-billion in the same quarter a year ago.
During the same period, the company’s operating earnings surged 60.5% to $37.75-billion ($1.30 per-share) compared with $23.28-billion or 81-cents per share a year earlier. The analyst community was anticipating revenues of $55.2-billion and operating earnings of $1.26 per-share, so Nvidia posted a 3.3% revenue surprise and a 3.2% earnings surprise. More importantly, Nvidia also raised its future guidance.
On the earnings call, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang told investors that, “There’s been a lot of talk about an AI bubble,” but he responded: “From our vantage point, we see something very different.” I especially liked his comment that, “Blackwell sales are off the charts, and cloud GPUs are sold out.” Despite this great news, as often happens, the stock price originally rose before the short sellers attacked. Nvidia has been under attack from articles in Seeking Alpha and Substack insinuating that Nvidia makes “circular” alliances with companies that drive their stock prices higher, as these alliances allow companies to be able to raise capital to buy Nvidia GPUs. I would call that circular reasoning, not “circular alliances.”
With a company growing its earnings and sales over 60% higher, the bears need to be “creative,” but on Friday Barron’s had a great response: “Nvidia Is Now Misunderstood. Here’s What Mattered Most from Earnings,” and Bloomberg reported that Nvidia’s receivables have risen 89% and are outpacing sales, implying that some new customers may not have the ready capital to pay for the expensive Blackwell GPUs. The abrupt intraday reversal on Thursday in Nvidia and the overall stock market was largely caused by these bear attacks (plus higher receivables), which, in my opinion, are highly exaggerated.
Specifically, I see the negative news media trying hard to imply that the emerging data-center boom will be constrained by construction delays as well as soaring electricity costs, but the simple fact of the matter is that the U.S. is the “Saudi Arabia of natural gas,” with massive proven reserves, so the U.S. has nearly unlimited resources to fund cheap electricity via natural gas-turbines. Although both GE Vernova and Siemens have 5-year order backlogs for their train-sized natural gas-turbines, data-centers can also operate on smaller turbines, which are already widely available, thanks to the aviation industry.
To demonstrate how the U.S. is poised to dominate data centers worldwide, Germany recently agreed to cut its planned natural gas-turbine development by half due to its pledge to decarbonize and rely on more renewable electricity sources. As a result, Germany’s high electricity prices are now subsidized by the German government in order to stem a manufacturing exodus that has been underway for the past several years due to high electricity prices, so the countries that are still striving to decarbonize simply cannot compete with America, since renewable electricity is much more expensive (and sometimes unreliable).
So why are so many countries, especially those in Europe, persisting with their NetZero goals, which make them uncompetitive compared to other countries, like China, India and the U.S., that use more fossil fuels? Europe is essentially accelerating their own economic decline. In America, we no longer have or enforce bans on natural gas and LNG production, so we are poised to continue to capture more business, especially with the trillions of dollars in on-shoring that the Trump administration has secured for data centers, plus the automotive, pharmaceutical and semiconductor industries.
The fact that Nvidia’s market capitalization is higher than the British, French, German and Italian stock markets says it all. In America, we have legal monopolies that are taking over the world. The Trump administration is embracing America’s economic dominance and hitting the accelerator pedal. Tariff inflation never materialized and the federal government shutdown hurt the Democratic opposition.
In other earnings reports last week, The Home Depot (HD) reported last Tuesday that the a “lack of storms” was partly responsible for its disappointing quarterly report. Specifically, CEO Ted Decker said, “Our results missed our expectations primarily due to the lack of storms in the third quarter, which resulted in greater than expected pressure in certain categories.” I guess not enough homes were destroyed in hurricanes this season! Decker added, “An expected increase in demand in the third quarter did not materialize” as “consumer uncertainty and continued pressure in housing are disproportionately impacting home improvement demand.” This is the fourth-quarter in a row in which Home Depot has missed analyst estimates. If I hear Home Depot’s CEO, instead of blaming a slow hurricane season, I would say that the housing market remains depressed and can best be shored up by another Fed key interest rate cut in December!
With Prosperity Rising, the Market Should Recover Soon
Heading into Thanksgiving, the Trump administration has lowered tariffs on beef, bananas, coffee and dozens of agriculture products in an aggressive attempt to lower food costs. In the wholesale commodity markets, many food groups are down so far this year. According to Trading Economics, egg prices are down 62% year-to-date (YTD), orange juice is down 71%, butter is down 30%, milk and cheese are down 8%, corn, wheat and rice are down 7%, 4% and 2% respectively, and poultry is 2% cheaper in 2025.
President Trump has repeatedly suggested that profits from his tariffs could be used to fund “dividend” checks to low-income and middle-income Americans. Trump wrote in Truth Social that, “A dividend of at least $2000 a person (not including high income people!) will be paid to everyone.” I’m not sure if this plan will actually happen. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said that any proposal for $2,000-checks would require legislation, and the Supreme Court could also intervene by ruling against on the legality of the Trump tariffs, but Bessent’s comment about the tariffs are the clearest sign yet that the Trump Administration will likely have to seek the approval of Congress in order to issue the payments.
Even without passage of any legislation for any widespread “helicopter money” via massive check printing, prosperity can be addictive. With some help from the Fed, I expect interest rates to decline, based on China’s deflationary forces, plus a stronger dollar, making commodities and imports cheaper.
The latest ADP labor data may convince the Fed to cut key interest rates more than expected as the AI job apocalypse persists. Furthermore, recent data suggest that rental prices are starting to decline, and that may help the Consumer Price Index (CPI) decline, due to the fact that Owners’ Equivalent Rent is a major component. Lower crude oil prices are also helping to lower inflationary pressures, so the Fed will likely cut rates in December, due also to AI-related labor weakness as well as cooling inflationary forces.
The Labor Department is back up and running, releasing the September payroll report on Thursday. Specifically, the Labor Department said 119,000-jobs were created in September, which was much better than the economists’ consensus estimate of 51,000. However, the September unemployment rate rose to 4.4%, up from 4.3% in August, reaching the highest unemployment rate in the past four years.
Also notable, the July and August payrolls were revised down by a cumulative 33,000-jobs. In August, 4,000-payroll jobs were lost, which is only the second time that payrolls have declined since the Covid-19 shutdowns back in 2020. So, although the September payroll report looked good on the surface, the details about a higher unemployment rate and downward revisions were troublesome.
The FOMC’s minutes from their previous meeting were released on Wednesday, and it is clear that a lot of key Fed members were frustrated by the lack of economic data due to the recent federal government shutdown. Specifically, the October payroll report will be delayed until December 16th, just after the December FOMC meeting, which will likely further frustrate the Fed. Since the Fed is data dependent, they may not cut rates at the December FOMC meeting, but since there will be an insightful ADP private payroll report for November in early December, that could influence a couple of FOMC voting members.
New York Fed President John Williams said during a speech in Santiago, Chile that he sees room in the near term to cut key interest rates again as the labor market softens. Specifically, Williams said, “I still see room for a further adjustment in the near term to the target range for the federal funds rate to move the stance of policy closer to the range of neutral, thereby maintaining the balance between the achievement of our two goals.” Barron’s then reported that there is up to a 71% chance of a December Fed rate-cut.
World News Last Week – From Brazil, Venezuela, China and Western Europe
The COP30 climate summit in Brazil ended with an embarrassing fire in an outdoor exhibit area. More importantly, up to 80 countries pushed back on the drive toward eliminating fossil fuels. Of course, China and India have never really complied with the major climate guidelines, and the U.S. did not even attend the conference, since the Trump administration does not want to transition away from fossil fuels.
Complicating the dissent at recent COP conferences, many poor countries want aid from richer countries, but now that many European countries are in a recession or experiencing stagnant economic growth, there is essentially little money for aid. As a result, COP is expected to continue to shrink in the upcoming years.
In other interesting global news, President Trump said his administration may hold talks with Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro, as the U.S. military buildup near Venezuela’s borders grows. Specifically, President Trump said, “We may be having some discussions with Maduro, and we’ll see how that turns out,” adding, “They would like to talk.” The USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier is now nearby, in the Caribbean, and the U.S. military recently carried out its 21st strike on a boat transporting drugs.
In Asia, deflation is destroying China, and now Japan has announced that its economy decreased at a 1.8% annual pace last quarter. In Europe, Britain has chased out many of its wealthy residents and now is forced to raise taxes to curtail its bloated budget. France remains dysfunctional and Parliament cannot pass a budget due to the inability to implement pension reforms. Germany continues to commit economic suicide by curtailing gas turbines to appease to NetZero crowd, which is systematically destroying its manufacturing base. As a result, when you look around the world, the U.S. remains an economic oasis.
In summary, U.S. GDP growth is expected to reach 5% in 2026, and I do not expect this GDP growth to be inflationary. The U.S. dollar is expected to steadily appreciate in 2026 due to: (1) a strong domestic economy, (2) higher interest rates than other major economies, and (3) organic GDP growth from new household formation as well as our ability to assimilate immigrants. I realize the Trump administration will continue to be attacked by domestic and international media, but success is addictive and I expect 2026 to be the most productive year in decades! Essentially, 2025 has been like 1998 and next year could be like 1999, my best performing year ever, when I had multiple portfolios appreciate more than 100%!
Finally, President Trump dispatched a high-level delegation to Ukraine. Specifically, Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, along with two four-star Army generals, were scheduled to hold discussions with President Zelensky and other Ukrainian officials. Then Driscoll is planning to meet with Russian officials. The White House decision to turn to Driscoll and senior military officers is based on the belief that Moscow might be more open to military-brokered negotiations. A senior White House official said, “Secretary Driscoll is traveling to Ukraine to get a sense of facts on the ground. He will participate in meetings in Ukraine and report his findings back to the White House.” This senior White House official also said, “The president has been clear that it is time to stop the killing and make a deal to end the war.” If this happens, an end to major wars would provide extra bullish fuel for a major market recovery in 2026.
Navellier & Associates; own Nvidia (NVDA), Palantir Technologies (PLTR), and GE Vernova Inc. (GEV), in managed accounts. Navellier does not own Home Depot (HD). Louis Navellier and his family own Nvidia (NVDA), Palantir Technologies (PLTR), GE Vernova Inc. (GEV), via a Navellier managed account, and Nvidia (NVDA), in a personal account. They do not own Home Depot (HD) personally.
All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Also In This Issue
A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
Earnings Season Ends with Nvidia’s Spectacular News
Income Mail by Bryan Perry
Combating the Stubbornly High Price of Home Ownership
Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
Most Currencies are in a “Race to the Bottom” (vs. Gold)
Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
If Bitcoin Cooperates, We May See a Bottom for Stocks
Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
The Market Could Use a Winter “Flu Shot”
View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here

Louis Navellier
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Important Disclosures:
Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.
Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.
None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.
Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.
One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.
ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:
- ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
- An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
- The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
- The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
- Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.
Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.
This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.
FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.
IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades. Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.
Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.
Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.
FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.