by Gary Alexander
November 19, 2024
As you read this, I’m off to New Orleans for their 50th annual Investment Conference (my own 41st in a row as MC, panel moderator or speaker there). As usual (for the past 15 years), I’ll be chairing a closing geo-political panel, which in past years has included some fiery debates between James Carville and the late Charles Krauthammer, or Karl Rove vs. Howard Dean, or Newt Gingrich vs. the late libertarian comic P.J. O’Rourke, or a memorable cat-fight between Ann Coulter and Susan Estrich. The fur did fly.
For this event, the conference planners have avoided the high-paid and somewhat predictable political speakers in favor of well-spoken and far-seeing pundits who happened to call election results clearly, far in advance of the event. Their books, which anticipated the Trump first and second victories, respectively, are: (1) Mary Katherine Ham, co-author (with Guy Benson) of a truly fun and incisive 2015 book, “End of Discussion: How the Left’s Outrage industry Shuts Down Debate, Manipulates Votes, and Makes America Less Free (and Fun),” then, a pair of manifestos: (2) Charles C.W. Cooke’s “Conservatarian Manifesto: Conservatives, and the Fight for the Right’s Future” (2015) and then (3) Scott McKay’s 2022 “Revivalist Manifesto: How Patriots Can Win the Next American Era,” which clearly predicted Trump’s comeback in a year when Trump had to be the longest shot for a successful comeback in modern history.
These authors certainly offered more valuable insights than a barrel-full of Nobel-winning geniuses. Two weeks before the election, 23 Nobel Economic Prize laureates signed an open letter saying that Trump’s economics agenda would be disastrous for America, once again reflecting their myopia and group think:
“Simply put, Harris’ policies will result in a stronger economic performance, with economic growth that is more robust, more sustainable, and more equitable,” the Nobel laureates wrote in the letter. Donald Trump’s policies, they added, would “lead to higher prices, larger deficits, and greater inequality.” As for Harris, they wrote that she “has emphasized policies that strengthen the middle class, enhance competition, and promote entrepreneurship. On issue after issue, Harris’ economic agenda will do far more than Donald Trump’s to increase the economic strength and well-being of our nation and its people.” – summary from “Financial Review,” November 1, 2024
We can only hope that these “brightest minds in economics” (Bloomberg) didn’t hoover-up their stock profits and pay the penalties or taxes for cashing in their 401(k) withdrawals the next day, since they would have missed the 5% gains in the first week, and more to come, after last week’s “back and fill.”
The market’s manic reaction to the Trump win and Republican sweep is predictable, as I pointed out last week, since Republican sweeps are historically profitable, but last week I made the standard comparison of measuring full years without discounting for inflation. This time around, I’ll look at the last eight years from election day, since the day after the two Trump wins (and Biden’s 2020), markets soared right away, so we should account for the election honeymoon period in the winner’s favor and also discount for CPI erosion, while giving a nod to the composition of each Congress, which changed under both Presidents:
From this table, the net 4-year market gains under Trump and Biden favored Biden in nominal gains of 69.6% to 57.5%, but after-inflation gains favored Trump (+46%) over Biden (+40%). However, the split powers in Congress (2022-24) gave Biden all his gains, vs. his loss during his one-party sweep of 2020-22.
As I covered here last week, Republican electoral sweeps historically average about twice as many gains (+13.5% per year) as Democratic electoral sweeps (+6.7%) in historical market examples stretching back to 1950. (See Growth Mail, 11-12-24: The Market Implications of a Republican Sweep – Navellier)
DC is Moaning the “Blue Swamp Blues” About Now
As we can tell from President-elect Trump’s early appointments, he is serious about his two familiar slogans, both copied from Ronald Reagan: “Drain the Swamp” and “Make American Great Again.”
Critics can debate his choices, tactics and goals, but there is no doubt that the swamp is blue and will fight back, as alligators and other swamp creatures are well equipped to bite back. How blue is the DC swamp?
As we can tell from localized voting and political donations, the Swamp is Deep Blue. Denizens of the Beltway voted over 3-to-1 for Harris over Trump, and the closer you get to the Capitol, the bigger that number gets: 4-1 in nearby Virginia cities, 8-1 in Prince George’s county, and 14-1 in DC, even though the DC vote was less than it was for Biden in 2020 or Hillary in 2016. Just over 90% of DC voters opted for Harris (vs. 6.5% for Trump), down from 93% for Hillary and 92% for Biden. Nearby jurisdictions followed suit:
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
I have first-hand experience with the Democrats’ power in Greater DC, as I ran for the Virginia State House of Delegates in 1997 against then 9-time incumbent Kenneth Plum. He is now a 21-time winner, in office 1982 to 2024. I like him, too. I sang two songs for him at his surprise 60th birthday party in 2001: “Young at Heart” and a reworking of Gilbert & Sullivan’s patter song from Pirates of Penzance, “He is the Very Model of a Democratic Delegate.” But Republicans and Independents (me) couldn’t beat him.
Political donations are harder to quantify, but a study just came out that our Federal Reserve governors and Fed staff contributed 11-to-1 to Democratic vs. Republican candidates in the three (Trump) cycles.
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
Some of this Fed bias is evident from the fact that the previous (Obama era) Fed Chair (Janet Yellen) was appointed Secretary of the Treasury in the Biden White House, and former New York Fed president William Dudley said he was comfortable picking a fight against Trump and his policies. The Fed staff and some regional Governors (like Mary Daly at the San Francisco Fed) have also pushed for climate and DEI regulations as Fed mandates, beyond their financial mandates of limiting inflation and unemployment.
Trump’s cabinet is a work in progress – mostly youthful, loyalist and maybe inexperienced within the established power structure – but that is also their strength, as we need some radical change in how the system operates if we are to halt runaway budget deficits, global wars, behemoth government departments and their massive regulations. Not every nomination will pass, but most will, and the results may dazzle.
All content above represents the opinion of Gary Alexander of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Also In This Issue
A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
“Drill, Baby, Drill” Should Trump Europe’s Green Failures and COP 29
Income Mail by Bryan Perry
The Pause That Refreshes – Before the Year End Rally
Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
What to Expect from Markets (and Swamp Creatures) in 2025
Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
Something Else is Worrying the Market
Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
We’re Entering the Best Season for Stocks
View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here
About The Author
Gary Alexander
SENIOR EDITOR
Gary Alexander has been Senior Writer at Navellier since 2009. He edits Navellier’s weekly Marketmail and writes a weekly Growth Mail column, in which he uses market history to support the case for growth stocks. For the previous 20 years before joining Navellier, he was Senior Executive Editor at InvestorPlace Media (formerly Phillips Publishing), where he worked with several leading investment analysts, including Louis Navellier (since 1997), helping launch Louis Navellier’s Blue Chip Growth and Global Growth newsletters.
Prior to that, Gary edited Wealth Magazine and Gold Newsletter and wrote various investment research reports for Jefferson Financial in New Orleans in the 1980s. He began his financial newsletter career with KCI Communications in 1980, where he served as consulting editor for Personal Finance newsletter while serving as general manager of KCI’s Alexandria House book division. Before that, he covered the economics beat for news magazines. All content of “Growth Mail” represents the opinion of Gary Alexander
Important Disclosures:
Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.
Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.
None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.
Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.
One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.
ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:
- ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
- An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
- The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
- The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
- Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.
Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.
This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.
FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.
IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades. Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.
Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.
Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.
FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.