by Bryan Perry
October 28, 2025
Investor stock portfolios are enjoying the best of times, fueled by some bullish current developments that are drawing money off the sidelines and into risk assets. As of Sunday night, a constructive trade deal with China from the Trump advance team looks positive, as a proposed 100% tariff on Chinese imports would be curtailed in exchange for a reduction of restrictions in rare-earth metals and other concessions.
Also, the delayed CPI inflation report released Friday paves the way for the Fed to lower short-term rates by a quarter-point this week and lay the groundwork for another quarter-point cut in December. The bull-market in AI mega technology is now broadening out to include most of the other 10-sectors of the S&P 500 – and it is exciting to see the mid-cap, small-cap, and micro-cap stocks not only participate, but play serious catch up ball on the conviction of the lower future borrowing rates that they so heavily depend on.
President Trump and President Xi are planning to meet to formalize a trade deal this week, just in time for China shipping goods to fuel a holiday shopping season that is being touted as incredibly important to China’s export market, being that the U.S. remains China’s largest single export market.
If the U.S. had imposed 100% tariffs on Chinese exports to America as of November 1, the impact on China’s economy would have been significant but not catastrophic, likely shaving 1%-2% off its GDP growth rate while accelerating a shift in China’s export strategy to compensate for the huge new tariffs.
To put this trade relationship into perspective, China’s exports to the U.S. account for roughly 2.9% of its GDP, down from a peak of 7.5% in 2006 (source: chinafocus.. The dependence of the Chinese economy on exports, and in particular on its exports to the U.S., has been declining significantly. The fear has been that China’s economy would suffer badly in a tariff war, but the data actually shows otherwise.
The chart below, produced by China’s Bureau of Statistics, casts some light on the notion that this week’s meeting doesn’t offer much in the way of major economic impact but is just a high-profile glad-handing between the two superpowers to feel each other out in the long game of global power domination. The trade deal makes for impressive headlines, but it doesn’t even begin to address China’s long-term goals.
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
It seems to me that this meeting is more about Trump trying to keep close to Xi as China’s rapid growth in military assets and its Belt and Road Initiative signal a formidable dual-track strategy to project power globally, both militarily and economically, threatening U.S. influence and favor in multiple markets and nations. Longer-term, it is my contention that Xi wants to outlast Trump’s final four-year tenure in office, and Trump wants to solidify his goals when he takes that last helicopter ride off the White House lawn.
Defense spending in China is surging. Official figures put China’s 2025 defense budget at $247-billion, but independent estimates suggest their actual military spending could be as high as $471-billion, making it the second largest global military power after the U.S. China now has the world’s largest navy by number of battle force ships. It is evolving into a blue-water navy, capable of operating far beyond its shores. While it still trails the U.S. in tonnage and missile capacity, its reach is expanding.
China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is at record investment levels. In the first half of 2025, China signed $66.2-billion in construction contracts and $57.1-billion in direct investments, nearly double the previous year’s pace (greenfdc). Projects include ports in Sri Lanka, railways in Africa, and energy pipelines across Central Asia. These assets often come with both commercial and military functions.
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
Critics argue that China’s lending practices trap countries in unsustainable debt, giving Beijing leverage over strategic assets like ports and telecom infrastructure. Together, China’s military buildup and BRI reflect a coordinated strategy to reshape global power dynamics. The military secures China’s interests abroad, while the BRI builds economic dependencies and influence. This dual approach is challenging U.S. dominance and reshaping alliances across the Global South, which is 50% of the planet. The threat is the U.S. must pay extreme fees to ship goods to half the world, those controlled by Chinese port facilities.
Donald Trump has brought a greater challenge to China than any preceding president and, in doing so, he has resolved to work with China on a peaceful basis. For Xi, this week’s trade deal is more about tactical de-escalation and not resolution. The threat of 100% tariffs, a delay in rare-earth export controls, promises of soybean purchases, and fentanyl drug enforcement are largely Xi’s reversible, tactical concessions.
A Change in Trade Strategy Between Trump’s First and Second Terms
There’s little evidence of structural changes to industrial subsidies, IP protections, or state-owned enterprise reform – core U.S. demands since 2018, as championed by U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, architect of Trump’s first-term trade war strategy. He isn’t working for Trump now because he was passed over for a Cabinet role and has declined to accept a lesser position in the administration.
Lighthizer’s zero-sum view of trade, coined in his litany of China’s “Seven Deadly Sins,” avers that foreign investment is a form of economic conquest. Lighthizer clashed with the more pro-market voices in Trump’s current team. His advocacy for taxing capital inflows and restricting foreign ownership of U.S. assets was seen as too extreme, even within Trump’s inner circle of second-term negotiators.
Lighthizer’s absence marks a pivot away from hard-line protectionism toward a more investment-friendly approach. While Trump still touts aggressive tariffs, his personnel choices suggest a balancing act between populist rhetoric and Wall Street interests. And by all measures, right or wrong, the market is “all in” on this line of thinking, now spearheaded by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. The current narrative is what the market wants to hear, and so … up we go.
This week’s meeting suggests China is offering just enough to defuse immediate escalation and live out the Trump era, while preserving long-term leverage. Many analysts argue that the Trump-Xi trade deal is a tactical win for Trump’s optics during the 2026 midterms. Trump may have won the news cycle, but Xi is playing a long game, preserving China’s strategic position while giving just enough to avoid escalation.
Donald Trump’s final term will end in January 2029. Xi removed term limits in 2018, allowing him to remain in power indefinitely. China’s ruling party employs strategic patience to outlast strong leaders like Trump. While Trump may win this month’s battle, Lighthizer’s framework offers a more coherent and enforceable doctrine for the U.S. to continue its dominance of an ideologically comprehensive adversary.
All content above represents the opinion of Bryan Perry of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Also In This Issue
A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
Data Center Stocks Dominate the Initial Earnings Reports
Income Mail by Bryan Perry
The Dangerous Long Game Dilemma with China
Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
Happy 96th Birthday, “Black Tuesday” – Please Don’t Come Back!
Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
Market Sets New Highs, After No “Trillion Dollar Tweets”
Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
Is This an “Ominous Silence – or “The Pause That Refreshes?”
View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here
Bryan Perry
SENIOR DIRECTOR
Bryan Perry is a Senior Director with Navellier Private Client Group, advising and facilitating high net worth investors in the pursuit of their financial goals.
Bryan’s financial services career spanning the past three decades includes over 20-years of wealth management experience with Wall Street firms that include Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and Paine Webber, working with both retail and institutional clients. Bryan earned a B.A. in Political Science from Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University and currently holds a Series 65 license. All content of “Income Mail” represents the opinion of Bryan Perry
Important Disclosures:
Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.
Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.
None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.
Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.
One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.
ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:
- ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
- An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
- The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
- The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
- Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.
Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.
This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.
FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.
IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades. Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.
Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.
Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.
FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.