March 5, 2019

A decade ago, on Thursday, March 5, 2009, bearish sentiment on the stock market hit an all-time high.

The weekly poll of the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) is widely considered to be a contrarian indicator, since investors tend to be super-bearish at market bottoms and super-bullish near the top. In the AAII survey, investors are asked if they are bullish, bearish, or neutral on the market over the next six months. Historically, the lowest-ever percentage of bears was just 6%, set on August 21, 1987, the week the market peaked before the catastrophic 1987 crash. The highest percentage of bears was 70.3% in the poll released March 5, 2009, the day before the major stock market indexes bottomed out.

Over the life of this survey, the average bearish sentiment has been 30.6% (with about 35% each as bulls or neutral.)  The standard deviation is 10.1 points, which means that approximately two-thirds (68%) of all poll results fall between 20.5% and 40.7% bearish, but on March 5, 2009, the bears peaked at an incredible four standard deviations above the norm. (Four standard deviations include 99.9% of all cases, meaning there is about one chance in 2,000 of reaching four sigma on the upside: One week in 40 years!)

The day after the AAII poll reached a record bearish level, the S&P 500 bottomed out on an intra-day level at an ominous 666.79. It went on to rise 39.5% over the next six months and 56.9% in 12 months.

The AAII poll was not an outlier. Professionals were equally bearish at the market lows. On Monday, March 9, 2009, a Wall Street Journal headline asked: “Dow 5000? There’s a Case for It… Earnings Point to 1995 Levels for Stocks.” The article began, “As earnings estimates are ratcheted down and hopes for a quick economic fix fade, the once-inconceivable notion of returning to Dow 5000 or S&P 500 looks a little less far-fetched.” On that day, the S&P 500 closed at 676.53 and the Dow closed at 6547.05, their lowest close of the 21st century. Both indexes have more than quadrupled from those levels in 10 years.

Investor sentiment was slow to recover. On the one-year anniversary of the market low (March 9, 2010), The Wall Street Journal quoted a worried Robert Shiller in an interview titled, “Stocks Still Expensive.”  The market was overvalued, Shiller said, because his CAPE ratio had gotten above 20, which “signaled that the stock market was expensive and sooner or later would hit a stretch of subpar returns.”

Investors have been super-slow to get back into this market. The results of a May 2018 Gallup poll showed that the percentage of American households owning stocks fell from 65% in 2007 to 55% in 2018, implying that at least 10% of Americans owned stock in 2007 but were so scarred by the 2008-09 crash that they stayed out of stocks – permanently. The paranoia profile for Americans under 35 is even worse. During the mostly-bullish years of 2001-2007, 52% of young Americans owned stocks vs. just 38% from 2008 to 2018. Jason Thomas, chief economist with the Carlyle Group, a private equity firm, said, “Psychological scars from the crisis make this one of the most unloved bull markets in history.”

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary

Perhaps this new reticence to invest comes from the volatility of this bull market. We’ve seen eight corrections of 9.8% or more. During the past 10 years, there were two corrections of 19% or more – the traditional definition of a bear market. The first was in 2011, seemingly confirming the bears’ worst fears.

The Power of “Reversion to the Mean”

Soon after the market bottomed in March 2009, I gave a talk about “reversion to the mean” at the Atlanta Investment conference in April. One of my first columns for Navellier & Associates covered the essence of that talk – basically that a historically large market decline implies an equally strong recovery phase.

My May 2009 Navellier blog entry was titled, “The Worst Crash Since 1929 Implies…the Best Recovery since 1932?” It received unexpected press coverage, since my idea seemed against the grain. Matt Krantz of USA Today called me the next week to ask for some more details and he wrote a review of that article.

In that article, I wrote, “A historical bottom like 1932, 1974, 1982 or 2009 implies a greater return. A reversion to the mean implies a market recovery on the order of 75% to 100% in two years.” Matt Krantz of USA Today summarized my view: “In the 12 to 21 months following the market bottoms after the previous five recessions, the Dow on average rocketed 55%, says Navellier & Associates.” In my column and in USA Today, I compared the then-recent (2007-09) decline and recovery to five previous analogues:

As it turns out, one year after that column was published (and 14 months after the market bottom), the Dow was up 79%, the greatest 14-month gain since 1933. That’s the power of “reversion to the mean.”

The last 20 years represent a massive reversion to the mean. First, tech stocks shot to the moon in 1999 and collapsed in 2000-02. Then there was a doubling of the major stock indexes from 2002 to 2007, lasting almost exactly five years. Then came a 55% decline in 17 months – October 2007 to March 2009.

The 10-year bull market we’re celebrating this week represents a “catching up” to the losses of 2000-09.

As you can see, the last 10 years have been one huge reversion to the mean. NASDAQ, though more volatile than most indexes, is only up a net 2.2% per year for the last 19 years. By comparison, the Dow Industrials have been “hot,” averaging 5.2% per year, while the golden mean S&P 500 is up 3.7% a year.

This is not a bubble by any means.

About The Author

Gary Alexander
SENIOR EDITOR

Gary Alexander has been Senior Writer at Navellier since 2009.  He edits Navellier’s weekly Marketmail and writes a weekly Growth Mail column, in which he uses market history to support the case for growth stocks.  For the previous 20 years before joining Navellier, he was Senior Executive Editor at InvestorPlace Media (formerly Phillips Publishing), where he worked with several leading investment analysts, including Louis Navellier (since 1997), helping launch Louis Navellier’s Blue Chip Growth and Global Growth newsletters.

Prior to that, Gary edited Wealth Magazine and Gold Newsletter and wrote various investment research reports for Jefferson Financial in New Orleans in the 1980s.  He began his financial newsletter career with KCI Communications in 1980, where he served as consulting editor for Personal Finance newsletter while serving as general manager of KCI’s Alexandria House book division.  Before that, he covered the economics beat for news magazines. *All content of “Growth Mail” represents the opinion of Gary Alexander*

Disclosures

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for you. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Results presented include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings.

Past performance is no indication of future results.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not intended or written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE: The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Request here a list of recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. for the preceding twelve months, please contact Tim Hope at (775) 785-9416.

Marketmail Archives