by Louis Navellier

September 7, 2022

Energy markets remain elevated as most of Europe strives to break away from Russia’s crude oil and natural gas supplies. Putin recently replaced his long-time ally, defense minister Sergei Shoigu, over frustration with the progress in his war with Ukraine. Furthermore, six of Putin’s allies have been shot or blown up, so Putin’s inner circle is becoming increasingly isolated, since Moscow is no longer safe.

Whether or not these assassinations originate from within Russia or from Ukrainian special forces, as the Russia media has claimed, is uncertain. As a result, there is a growing possibility that there could be a regime change in Russia that could disrupt the crude oil and natural gas markets.

In the event that there is a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, post-Putin, the stock market could explode 40% to the upside. However, as long as Putin remains in power, the Ukrainian war is expected to persist in a long, drawn-out conflict and Putin will continue to use energy as a weapon to punish the West.

Russia shut down its Nord Stream 1 natural gas pipeline last Wednesday for “maintenance” and will thereby provide Europe with a preview of how it must learn to cope without any new Russian natural gas coming in. Then, on Friday, Russia decided to indefinitely suspend natural gas to Europe after the G7 foolishly decided to push for price caps on Russian crude oil. Some European officials are saying that they have secured enough natural gas to avoid rationing this winter, but that depends on how cold this winter will be, and they are still struggling to replace Russian natural gas supplies for 2023 and beyond, despite LNG imports from Canada, Qatar and the U.S.  Europe’s other alternatives include a new natural gas terminal in Estonia from Norway and the extension of a natural gas pipeline from Spain.

Regardless of where Europe gets its natural gas in the future, the net result will be much higher utility bills. Since Europe has an elderly population, these high utility bills are causing massive social problems as a growing number of retired folks and poor families cannot pay their utility bills. The European Union (EU) on Monday said that is preparing to intervene to help families dampen soaring electricity costs, as the European Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen, is expected to provide details on how the EU will intervene to help consumers with high natural gas and electricity costs. Specifically, the EU is expected to impose price caps, like Spain is utilizing. The only problem with price caps is that they could cause shortages in the future, so Europe’s power crisis is expected to persist for the foreseeable future.

The Labor Day Employment Report Offered a “Mixed Review” of the U.S. Jobs Market

Going into the Labor Day weekend, the Labor Department on Friday announced that 315,000 payroll jobs were created in August, but the big surprise was that June and July payrolls were revised down by a cumulative 107,000 jobs, so the unemployment rate rose to 3.7%, up from 3.5% in July. The other reason the unemployment rate rose was that the number of workers looking for a job rose by 786,000 in August. That pushed the Labor Force Participation Rate up to 62.4% in August from 62.1% in July. Average hourly earnings rose 0.3% ($0.10) to $32.36 per hour in August. Wages have risen 5.2% in the past year.

ADP reported that private payrolls rose only 132,000 in August, down from 268,000 in July, so it appears that job growth is slowing dramatically. August is a notoriously volatile month, due to seasonal summer work. If the U.S. job creation machine winds down, then it will put pressure on the Fed to stop raising key interest rates, which is why I still expect that September 21st, will be the Fed’s last key interest rate hike.

In other labor news, the Labor Department reported on Thursday that new unemployment claims declined to 232,000 in the latest week, down from a revised 237,000 the previous week. Continuing unemployment claims rose to 1.438 million in the latest week, up from a revised 1.415 million in the previous week.

I should add that the Labor Department also revised second quarter productivity on Thursday to a 4.1% annual decline, up from its previous estimate of a 4.6% annual decline. In the past 12 months, through the end of the second quarter, the Labor Department is reporting a 2.4% productivity decline, which represents the largest annual productivity decline since these productivity metrics began in 1948.

The best news released last week was that the Conference Board announced on Tuesday that its consumer confidence index surged to 103.2 in August, up from 95.3 in July. This is the first increase after three straight monthly declines. The “present situation” component rose to 145.3 in August (up from 139.7 in July), the first increase since March, and the “expectations component” surged to 75.1 (up from 65.6 in July). Based on Best Buy’s better-than-expected results last week, and this report of surging consumer confidence, there is growing hope that retail sales can outpace inflation rates in the upcoming months.

In the last piece of news, the Institute of Supply Management (ISM) on Thursday announced that its manufacturing purchasing manager index (M-PMI) was unchanged in August at 52.8. The “new orders” component rose to 51.3 in August (up from 48 in July) and the “backlog of orders” component rose to 53 in August (up from 51.3 in July). Unfortunately, the “current production” component declined to 50.4 in August (down from 53.5 in July). Overall, any reading above 50 signals an expansion, but the ISM manufacturing PMI is running at its slowest pace since May 2020, after a 27-month expansion.

Corporate Earnings May Have Peaked and May Soon Decline…Except in Energy

Turning to third-quarter earnings, my favorite economist, Ed Yardeni, now expects S&P 500 earnings to decline 5.4% and 3.8% in the third and fourth quarters, respectively. A strong dollar is unquestionably hindering multi-national companies, since approximately half of the S&P 500’s sales are paid in foreign currencies. Furthermore, year-over-year comparisons are now becoming more difficult, so in the midst of this upcoming “earnings drought,” I expect that energy stocks will be more important than ever, since the energy sector is the only sector that is not characterized by analyst earnings estimate cuts and should post the strongest sales and earnings in the next two quarters, regardless of last week’s drop in crude oil prices.

The big drop in crude oil prices last week appears to be largely seasonal and also based on recession fears emanating from Asia and Europe. For example, Russia’s crude oil exports to Asia are now at a 5-month low, falling by more than 500,000 barrels per day. But the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) reported on Wednesday that U.S. demand for crude oil was larger than analysts expected, since crude oil inventories declined 3.3 million barrels in the latest week vs. the forecasted 1.483 million barrel decline.

I must also add that cited a news report from a pro-Iranian television station in London that quoted a former IAEA official saying, “Iran and the U.S. have reached an agreement (on revival of the Iran nuclear deal), and it will be announced in the next two to three weeks.” I am skeptical of this report, since it is second-hand and has not been corroborated by other news media. Furthermore, if the Biden Administration announced that it has allowed Russia to negotiate a new nuclear deal with Iran, Israel would be furious, giving Republicans strong ammunition just before the mid-term elections.

Naturally, the prospect that Iran could expand its crude oil exports is also weighing on crude oil prices, but again, I remain skeptical that a new Iranian nuclear deal will be announced in the upcoming weeks.

In other earnings news, Nvidia warned on Wednesday that it could lose as much as $400 million in quarterly sales after the federal government imposed new licensing requirements on shipments of some of its most advanced chips to China and Russia. Although Nvidia does not sell its chips to Russia, the U.S. is clearly worried that its chips will end up in Russia via China. Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) is also being hit by these new export restrictions by the federal government, so the war over artificial intelligence (AI) chips is now underway and, unfortunately, the first casualties are the leading U.S. chip companies.

Complicating matters further, Nvidia on Thursday said that the U.S. government told the company that it can continue to develop its H100 AI chip in China! Let’s hope that both AMD and Nvidia do not move their plants overseas, since China has been a big developer of AI devices.

In the meantime, China’s spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Wang Wenbin, on Thursday said that the U.S. was attempting to impose a “technological blockade” on China. Wenbin said the ban showed that America was trying to maintain its “technological hegemony.” In the meantime, Nvidia said that it is merely “engaging with customers in China” and “seeking to satisfy their planned or future purchases of our data center products with products not subject to the new license requirement.”

Interestingly, Hewlett Packard is also upset at the new U.S. restrictions and said, “AMD and Nvidia have manufacturing locations throughout Asia, in China, the Philippines, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Malaysia.”  I should add that Taiwan Semiconductor also makes Nvidia’s graphics and AI chips.

Navellier & Associates owns Nvidia (NVDA), Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM), and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), in managed accounts. We do not own Hewlett Packard (HWP) or Best Buy (BBY). Louie Navellier and his family personally own Nvidia (NVDA), and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) via a Navellier managed account, and Nvidia (NVDA), in a personal account. He does not own Hewlett Packard (HWP), Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM), or Best Buy (BBY).

All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

Also In This Issue

Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
EU Natural Gas Saga Hits Dramatic Escalation

Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
It’s Human to Worry, But It’s Not Very Profitable

View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here

About The Author

Louis Navellier

Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at or by requesting a copy by emailing All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.