August 7, 2018

The July jobs report came out Friday, but I generally don’t pay much attention to the monthly jobs total since it’s subject to such great revision in future months, especially when the data comes out so early in the month (8:30 am on August 3 in this case). How do you expect government bean counters to measure the entirety of the employment picture just two days after the close of the month being examined?

As always, I prefer to look at long-term trends. The steady addition of decent-paying jobs is correlated with national wealth and stock market profits, as this chart of total payrolls vs. the Russell 3000 shows:

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary

Digging beneath the numbers, there are two misconceptions I would like to begin with, before tackling the 800-pound gorilla in the labor market pool – the disappearing Prime-Working-Age Male.

Myth #1: “Wages are stagnant.” This one bothers me because it discourages people from seeking work. It burdens young people with the myth that only “dead-end hamburger-flipping jobs at minimum wage” are available, and that there is no escape from a dismal fast-food joint – the traditional entry-level job.

In truth, inflation-adjusted average hourly earnings have been rising steadily for the last 25 years (see the blue line, below), from $15 to nearly $20 per hour. The blue line accounts for about 80% of all workers, and it is up 29% from 1995 to 2018. Wages have risen 10% for all workers since those data started being kept in 2006 (red line, below). This is inflation-adjusted, so it can’t be described as “wage stagnation.”

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary

Myth #2: Youth are trapped in dead-end jobs. The Atlanta Fed compiles a “Wage Growth Tracker” by age group (called “age cohorts”). Youth in the 16-24 age bracket (the blue line in the chart below) have always seen their wages grow faster than any other group. From February 2013 to November 2016, wage inflation for the 16-24 group grew from 3.5% to a peak of 8.4% before settling down to a still-high 7.1% in April 2018. By comparison, wages are only growing 3.4% for the prime working-age 25-54 cohorts (and 3.2% overall) and 2.0% for Baby Boomers over age 55 – the most rapidly growing slice of workers. (The percentage of workers over age 55 has increased from 13% in 2000 to an astounding 23.3% today.)

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary

Even those without a high school diploma have an excellent chance of being employed. According to Friday’s jobs report, a record 19 of 20 in the Labor Force without a diploma are currently employed.

Entry-level jobs are important, as they teach youth basic job skills of showing up on time, following instructions, and serving customer’s requests in a friendly manner. Those skills can be transferred up the line into management positions at the same company or at a more prestigious corporation later in life.

But when looking at the aggregate data, the giant question is: Where have the able-bodied males gone?

Where Have all the PWAMs (Prime Working Age Males) Gone?

“The progressive detachment of ever-larger numbers of adult men from the reality and routines of regular paid labor poses a self-evident threat to our nation’s future prosperity. It can only result in lower living standards, greater economic disparities, and slower economic growth than we might otherwise expect.”

– Nicholas Eberstadt, “Men Without Work,” The American Enterprise Institute, January 30, 2018

Unfortunately, a lot of Prime Working-Age Males (PWAMs) have dropped out of the job market. They are Not in the Labor Force (NILF) for a variety of reasons, causing the Labor Force Participation Rate (LFPR) to remain at 63% or less for the last four years, down from a peak of 67% in the late 1990s.

Isolating the PWAM population, the percent dropping out of the labor force has doubled from 6% in the supposedly depressed 1970s – the era of “stagflation” and “Take this Job and Shove it!” – to 12% in the booming 2010s. Why would 12% of a generation of virile young males drop out of the labor force?

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary

This is the question asked (and answered) by Nicolas Eberstadt’s 2016 book “Men Without Work: America’s Invisible Crisis.” It’s hard to put a statistical button on the cause, but Ed Yardeni put it into a sort of “rap song rhyme” last week. Unfortunately, the answer involves a destructive lifecycle spiral:

Disabled, ill, & popping pills
Lacking incentive, lacking skills
Doing time, catching cheap thrills

Taken in order, disability claims have skyrocketed. Didem Tüzemen, an economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, in a February paper titled “Why Are Prime-Age Men Vanishing from the Labor Force?” analyzed the Current Population Survey (CPS) over the last 20 years (1996 to 2016) and she found that nearly half (48.3%) of the PWAM-NILFs in 2016 said that they were disabled or ill. In a similar 2017 paper (“Where Have All the Workers Gone? An Inquiry into the Decline of the US Labor Force Participation Rate”), Alan Krueger, a Princeton University and NBER economist, cited findings that nearly half of all prime-working-age NILFs “take pain medication on a daily basis, and in nearly two-thirds of these cases they take prescription pain medication,” contributing to the opioid overuse epidemic.

Incentive is drained by support systems. Another 2017 paper titled “Declining Prime-Age Male Labor Force Participation, Why Demand- and Health-Based Explanations Are Inadequate” by Scott Winship of George Mason University, used an after-tax income measure adjusted for inflation to show that 76% of PWAM-NILFs have managed to avoid poverty since the income of the average Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) recipient about matches the after-tax income of a full-time worker earning minimum wage. Plus, the SSDI recipient gets Medicare benefits due to their “increase in self-reported disability.”

Wasting time: There was a 67% rise in the nonparticipation rate of younger PWAMs (aged 25-34) from 1996 to 2016. One third were in training or school, one third had a criminal record, according to Winship. Few were taking care of children, so what were they doing? Studies show they devoted about eight hours a day to “socializing, relaxing, and leisure,” like video games. They also gamble, use drugs, and watch TV a lot. Eberstadt says they “have relinquished what we ordinarily think of as adult responsibilities.”

The Fed’s latest (July) Beige Book says there are plenty of jobs available but there is a nationwide labor shortage “across a wide range of occupations,” due to a lack of qualified workers and, in some cases, a lack of willing workers. Last Wednesday, The Wall Street Journal (in “Youths Shrug at Construction Jobs”) quantified the labor shortage of construction workers, which means “fewer homes are built, pushing prices up for perhaps years to come.” They cited a study by BuildZoom chief economist Issi Rome, which says the U.S. had 11.7 million construction workers in 2005, but in 2016, with 28 million more folks to house, construction workers fell 13% to 10.2 million. Employers are desperately in need of warm bodies. The May Beige Book said employers were willing to “relax drug testing standards and restrictions on hiring felons to alleviate labor shortages.” Importing willing immigrants would also work, but we’ve got to find a way to open America to those willing to work on good jobs – now going begging.


About The Author

Gary Alexander

Gary Alexander has been Senior Writer at Navellier since 2009.  He edits Navellier’s weekly Marketmail and writes a weekly Growth Mail column, in which he uses market history to support the case for growth stocks.  For the previous 20 years before joining Navellier, he was Senior Executive Editor at InvestorPlace Media (formerly Phillips Publishing), where he worked with several leading investment analysts, including Louis Navellier (since 1997), helping launch Louis Navellier’s Blue Chip Growth and Global Growth newsletters.

Prior to that, Gary edited Wealth Magazine and Gold Newsletter and wrote various investment research reports for Jefferson Financial in New Orleans in the 1980s.  He began his financial newsletter career with KCI Communications in 1980, where he served as consulting editor for Personal Finance newsletter while serving as general manager of KCI’s Alexandria House book division.  Before that, he covered the economics beat for news magazines. *All content of “Growth Mail” represents the opinion of Gary Alexander*


Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for you. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Results presented include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings.

Past performance is no indication of future results.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not intended or written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE: The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Request here a list of recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. for the preceding twelve months, please contact Tim Hope at (775) 785-9416.

Marketmail Archives