by Gary Alexander

August 30, 2022

Jackson Hole, Wyoming, is a nice fishing spot, and former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker loved to fish.

The first Fed conference sponsored by the Kansas City district was held in 1978 and was titled, “World Agricultural Trade,” since Kansas City is situated in America’s breadbasket, with some prime farmland.

It was a pretty dull affair until 1982, when the market was just beginning to rise after Fed Chair Paul Volcker wrestled hyper-inflation to the mat by raising rates up to 20% from 1979 to 1982, so to lure their 6’7” MVP to the meeting, the Kansas City Fed decided to hold their 1982 annual meeting near a fishing spot Volcker liked in Jackson Hole – in the remote Northwestern corner of the Kansas City Fed’s district.

Federal Reserve Districts Map

As it turns out, Missouri is headquarters for two of the Fed’s 12 districts, with my favorite District, St. Louis, holding down the eastern half of the state. They specialize in monetarist studies and historical charts with their FRED data base. The Kansas City district is more of a bucolic, farm-oriented district.

How did Missouri capture two of the 12 Fed district capitals? Elementary, my dear Wilson. When the Fed was born in 1913, the first year of Democratic President Woodrow Wilson (serving 1913-1921), the Speaker of the House was Champ Clark, a Democrat from Missouri. The Federal Reserve System was opposed by James Reed, a powerful Democratic Missouri Senator from Kansas City who served on the Senate Banking Committee, so Wilson’s Secretary of Agriculture – David F. Houston, from St. Louis, and one of the three members of the Federal Reserve Bank Organization Committee – and Clark held out the plum of a Federal Reserve District for St. Louis AND Kansas City, making Reed and Houston happy.

Jackson Hole Scenery Images

For the last 40 years, Paul Volcker’s fishing haven has become an annual getaway for central bankers, with some of the most beautiful scenery (above), usually causing some reflection and thought about the future of central banking, rather than some 8-minute rant about fixing the problems bankers have caused.

Be that as it may, this late August confab has become an annual rallying point for the stock market over the last 15 years, since the world fell apart in 2007-09, but this year was an exception. Usually, this pre-Labor Day meeting in the Rockies provided a boost the market needed, especially under Ben Bernanke:

Ben Bernanke Made History with His QE (“Helicopter Money”) Pronouncements in Wyoming

  • The 2010 Jackson Hole conference was held August 26-28. In his August 27 talk, Mr. Bernanke said that the pace of economic growth had been “less vigorous” than the Fed was expecting, and the pace of the U.S. job growth was “painfully” slow.  He also acknowledged that the Fed was surprised by the “sharp deterioration” in the U.S. trade balance. His solution was to revive the Fed’s late-2008 “quantitative easing” (QE) scheme. The market loved this QE2: The S&P rose from 1040 on the day of Bernanke’s Jackson Hole talk to 1363 the following April, up over 30%.
  • The 2011 Jackson Hole conference was held August 25-27, during an especially volatile month in market history. Gold was soaring. Stocks were sagging. At Jackson Hole, Chairman Bernanke laid out the groundwork for another new Fed monetary strategy called “Operation Twist.” The details weren’t announced until September 21, but then various Fed governors hit the road to explain and defend their $400 billion operation to artificially flatten the yield curve. The stock market loved Operation Twist.  The S&P 500 rose over 26% from August 2011 to April of 2012.
  • The 2012 Jackson Hole conference, held August 30 to September 1, laid the groundwork for QE3, which was officially launched on September 13. Bernanke’s Jackson Hole remarks were more frank than usual. First, he said that the stagnant job market was of “grave concern” to the Fed. He also called current economic growth “far from satisfactory” and “tepid.” Because of this, Bernanke said that the Fed will “provide additional policy accommodation as needed.” This became QE3, which the market loved, as the S&P 500 rose over 17% from its August 2012 lows.
  • The 2013 Jackson Hole conference was held August 22-24. By then, Chairman Bernanke was a lame duck, so he let his replacement (Janet Yellen) speak in his place. Strangely, she did not say much, except as part of a panel. Since the skies were smoky around Jackson Hole, due to all of the fires in Idaho, the inside joke was that Jackson Hole’s skies reflected the foggy future of the Fed, especially since Bernanke’s hints of “tapering” (uttered in May) were spooking the markets. In the end, tapering failed to faze the market, with the S&P 500 rising 16% in the next 7 months.

Bernanke’s time at the Fed expired in January 2014, but here’s his track record after the 2008-09 crash:

Market Rallies Table

Janet Yellen (and Mario Draghi) Continued to Spread the Benjamins Around

Long after Benjamin Bernanke left the scene, the Benjamins kept pouring out of the Fed. Chairperson Janet Yellen took her turn at the helm, saying, “Our goal is to help Main Street, not Wall Street,” but she turned out helping both. By keeping rates super-low, she encouraged many businesses to borrow money at low rates, often to buy back more of their shares.  Low rates also make home mortgages and vehicle loans more affordable, reviving the housing and auto markets. Low rates also put a damper on the debt service portion of the federal budget – even though low rates limit some fixed income investors.

Federal Reserve Chairman Images

In all, Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen kept the Federal Reserve’s key short-term interest rate – the Fed Funds Rate – near zero (officially, in a range of zero to 0.25%) for seven full years (seven of President Obama’s eight years in office), starting on December 16, 2008 and lasting until December 16, 2015, encompassing Bernanke’s final five Jackson Hole conferences, and Janet Yellen’s first two sessions there.

  • More importantly, the 2014 Jackson Hole conference introduced Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) into the conversation when European Central Bank President Mario Draghi indicated that he was worried about inflation staying too low for too long. This laid the groundwork for Europe’s more virulent version of QE, including negative interest rates, starting in 2014.

Several rounds of Quantitative Easing (QE), seven years of ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policy), bolstered by Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), now popular in Washington DC, and “helicopter money” (Bernanke’s phrase) has been a bold experiment in avoiding a Greater Depression, and that sort of succeeded, but the central bankers waited too long to return to normal after 2008. Since the financial crisis of 2008, central bankers have bent over backward to be accommodating, fighting any remote chance of a 1930s rerun.

Jackson Hole Attendees Image

This fear of deflation has caused central bankers to fuel too much inflation for too long before belatedly fighting back, and that has put Jerome Powell in an obviously foul mood. Perhaps he is angry at himself and other central bankers – and justifiably so – but his Friday temper tantrum caused a Wall Street panic.

As I wrote last June 7 and June 14, the stock market may not bottom this year until September or early October, if history is any guide, so we may have a rocky road ahead. This does NOT mean sell stocks. I may be wrong, and it’s better to weather any market panic, or switch sectors, than to sell all stocks.

We may know more this week when August’s M-PMI is released. Economist Ed Yardeni thinks this key index could drop below 50—indicating contraction—based on what he calculates from averaging the New York and Philly business conditions results for August. That might heighten recession fears again.

Also, the full weight of Quantitative Tightening (QT), or $95 billion per month taken out of circulation from the Fed’s balance sheet, could have the opposite effect of QE, i.e., radically lower inflation by year’s end, as I predicted at the start of 2022. This could put upward pressure on bond yields, which could test the resolve of international T-bond buyers. Is the U.S. still the global capital oasis? Yes, I think it still is.

So, as we celebrate the 40th anniversary of the first Jackson Hole meeting with a mini-replay of the first one – when Paul Volcker faced down runaway inflation with monster tightening – we should remember what happened next. August 1982 was also the birth of a monster bull market, rising 15-fold in 17 years.

All content above represents the opinion of Gary Alexander of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at or by requesting a copy by emailing All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.