by Gary Alexander

August 3, 2021

I have lived all my life in coastal states. Currently, I write from a small island near Victoria, BC, while our other Market Mail authors write from East Coast states like Florida, Virginia, and New York. In late July, I spent a week in what the coastal elite call “flyover country,” but more specifically it is the geographical center of America. After Hawaii and Alaska gained Statehood in 1959, America’s center shifted north and west from Kansas to Belle Fourche, north of Rapid City and Mount Rushmore in western South Dakota.

The occasion was the annual Freedom Fest, held in the shadow of Mount Rushmore rather than under the neon glitter of Las Vegas, due to the unwillingness of Nevada politicians to guarantee housing for large conferences in the era of COVID. South Dakota, by contrast, had no mask mandates (and barely enough hotel rooms), but Governor Kristi Noem, her husband, and Lt. Governor Larry Rhoden welcomed us.

Freedom Fest Images

The 250+ featured speakers, as always, covered a variety of subjects – from fine arts and philosophy to politics and investments. I spoke on several subjects, which I summarized in my last three columns. This time, let me cover highlights from two other speakers. First, economist Steve Moore was effective in several formats in arguing for more financial freedom. In his first talk, he joked that President Joe Biden had mentioned in a live CNN town hall on Wednesday, July 21, our opening day, that his multi-trillion-dollar spending packages will “reduce inflation.” Moore was referring to a $3.5 trillion spending package and perhaps $1.5 trillion more in infrastructure spending for $5 trillion in “anti-inflationary spending.”

President Biden was repeating what he had said on Monday, July 19, when he said that more government spending “will be a force for achieving lower prices for Americans.” But Moore responded: “On what planet is the President living when $5 trillion in fiat money creation is considered to be anti-inflationary?”

Moore added, “Government spending doesn’t stimulate the economy. It de-stimulates the economy and causes inflation. One thing we learned from Milton Friedman is government spending doesn’t stimulate anything except government. We should be aggressively cutting government spending now, not raising it. If these policies worked, Argentina, Mexico, and Zimbabwe would be the richest countries in the world.”

As if to verify Moore’s analysis, the core personal consumption expenditure (PCE), the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation measure, came out on Friday, July 30, a week after Freedom Fest ended. The PCE rose at an annual rate of 3.5% in June, up from 3.4% in May, reaching its highest growth rate since April 1992.

Fed chair Jerome Powell has repeatedly called the current inflation surge “transitory,” but in his latest testimony last Wednesday, July 28, he started to waffle on that premise. At the start of this year, the Fed had predicted PCE inflation to rise 1.8% in 2021. By March, he bumped it up to 2.4%, and in June the Fed raised their forecast to 3.4%, nearly double their forecast of six months earlier. Some crystal ball!

Talk Highlights from Steve Moore and Grover Norquist Images

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

Grover Norquist, President of Americans for Tax Reform, had kind words to say for South Dakota’s tax structure, then he quickly added that there are eight states that have zero state income tax and at least five other states now in the process of cutting state income taxes. He added that, “People are moving to the lower tax states from high-tax states,” a trend explored in great detail in Steve Moore’s book, written with fellow economist Art Laffer, “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of States” (2014).

The clear division between high-tax (mostly “blue”) states and low-tax (mostly “red” states) is obvious upon closer examination. The editors of The Wall Street Journal recently titled an editorial, “A Tale of Two Recoveries: Why is the jobless rate so much higher in Democratic-run states?” (July 22, 2021)

In April, as the table above shows, the six states with the lowest jobless rates (all under 3.5%) are all red states. In June, that list expanded to become the top nine states with the lowest unemployment rates being governed by Republicans. Meanwhile, the 10 states with the highest jobless rates are run by Democrats.

The high-tax Democratic states continue to lose population to lower-tax states. Prolonged lockdowns in blue states have resulted in permanent small business closures, while stiff regulations and high taxes tend to throttle small business formation there. According to Census Bureau data, Florida recorded twice as many new business applications per capita over the last year as New York. Democratic-run states are also mostly continuing with the $300 unemployment bonus checks (sponsored by the Democratic Congress) through Labor Day, while most Republican governors have already ended this unnecessary handout.

It is pretty clear which policies work best to reduce poverty, increase wages, and create jobs, and which promote the opposite, so it remains a mystery why voters choose politicians that tend to choke off growth.

South Dakota – a Strong Pro-Business State in Search of a Labor Force

When I stayed two extra days in South Dakota after the conference, I could see the fruits of the state’s business-friendly, low tax environment in action. There were both high points and some warning signs.

Arriving in Rapid City, South Dakota on July 20, there were no cabs at the airport, and the Uber and Lyft wait times were averaging 30 minutes, so I took a long van ride to my hotel. Rides were scarce all week, so the conference hired big busses to ferry hundreds of attendees to hotels or remote conference events.

In 2019, pre-COVID, South Dakota was voted among the Top Five states in several key categories and among the Top 10 in moving destinations – a spectacular statistic considering its small population (under one million) and its remote rural location in the upper Midwest. It is clearly a great state for business:

  1. State for Affordable Business Costs (source: Forbes, 2019)
  2. State for Cost of Doing Business and Business Friendliness (CNBC, 2019)
  3. Best State for Fiscal Stability (US News & World Report, 2019)
  4. Low Tax Burden State (US News & World Report, 2019)
  5. State for Inbound Migration (United Van Lines, 2019)

South Dakota is also one of eight states with no state income tax. In addition, the state boasts:

  • No corporate income tax
  • No personal income tax
  • No personal property tax
  • No business inventory tax
  • No inheritance or estate tax
  • A “right to work” state
  • A low crime rate

South Dakota has one of the lowest unemployment rates in the nation, under 3% since March, bottoming at 2.8% in April and May, but therein lies the rub for businesses, and a threat to the statistical home run streak described above. Among the 50 states, South Dakota ranks #47 in available work force and #48 in infrastructure. As I cruised the roads there last week (on July 25 and 26), I saw long lines everywhere and as I stopped for lunch, I found a couple of famous chain restaurants closed with signs sadly proclaiming:

“Temporarily closed for staffing issues” … and “CLOSED; currently hiring, please call us at ….”

Still, the Rushmore Region of South Dakota is booming. As I drove south to Mount Rushmore last Monday, the parking lots to “Reptile World” and “Bear Country USA” were packed, with long lines to enter the parks. So was Mount Rushmore. American flags flew everywhere in this fiercely patriotic state. (The number of military veterans in the Rushmore Region is 18,593, or 70% above the per capita norm.)

As of 2020, the population of Rushmore Region had increased by 6% since 2015, rising from 185,000 to 196,000 and it is expected to grow another 4% to 204,000 by 2025. There are currently 36,752 millennials (age 24-40, born 1981-1997 and of prime working age) in the region, but there is still a worker shortage.

If only we could get 95% of U.S. Millennials to go back to work, we might see 7% GDP growth in 2021.

All content above represents the opinion of Gary Alexander of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

Also In This Issue

Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
The Relentless Bid Under Treasuries Continues

Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
Buying and Selling Good Stocks Too Often Can Be Costly

View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here

About The Author

Gary Alexander
SENIOR EDITOR

Gary Alexander has been Senior Writer at Navellier since 2009.  He edits Navellier’s weekly Marketmail and writes a weekly Growth Mail column, in which he uses market history to support the case for growth stocks.  For the previous 20 years before joining Navellier, he was Senior Executive Editor at InvestorPlace Media (formerly Phillips Publishing), where he worked with several leading investment analysts, including Louis Navellier (since 1997), helping launch Louis Navellier’s Blue Chip Growth and Global Growth newsletters.

Prior to that, Gary edited Wealth Magazine and Gold Newsletter and wrote various investment research reports for Jefferson Financial in New Orleans in the 1980s.  He began his financial newsletter career with KCI Communications in 1980, where he served as consulting editor for Personal Finance newsletter while serving as general manager of KCI’s Alexandria House book division.  Before that, he covered the economics beat for news magazines. All content of “Growth Mail” represents the opinion of Gary Alexander

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.