by Louis Navellier

August 17, 2021

Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) is “deeply concerned” about the Fed’s easy money policy and urged the Fed to curtail its aggressive intervention in the bond market. In a letter to Fed Chair Jerome Powell, Senator Manchin said, “With the recession over and our strong economic recovery well underway, I am increasingly alarmed that the Fed continues to inject record amounts of stimulus into our economy.”

This raises questions about whether or not the Fed might taper sooner than expected.

There are two confirmed hawks at the Fed, namely the Dallas and Kansas City district bank presidents, Robert Kaplan and Esther George. Although some Fed members want the Fed to address tapering at its September Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, the hawks are still in the minority. The doves, like Chicago Fed president Charles Evans, still want to continue with quantitative easing and easy monetary policy for the foreseeable future, since key economic targets (like employment) have not been achieved.

I am still in the camp that the Fed will not address tapering until its December FOMC meeting, since Fed Chairman Powell is up for renewal in early 2022 and the Biden Administration is still proposing spending trillions more dollars in the wake of its $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill. Due to all of this proposed new spending, which carries much less bipartisan support, it could complicate future Treasury auctions if the Fed started tapering while the 2021 federal budget deficit was soaring. As a result, I expect that the Fed will remain accommodative, citing the Covid-19 Delta variant as a “new risk” to the economy, and continue to kick any tapering decision down the road until its December FOMC meeting.

As for inflation, the Labor Department announced last Wednesday that its Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 0.5% in July and has now risen 5.4% in the past 12 months, reaching the highest annual rate in 13 years. Food prices rose 0.7% in July, while gasoline prices surged 2.4%. The core CPI, excluding food and energy, rose 0.3%, which was just below the economists’ consensus expectation of a 0.4% increase.

That number may seem manageable, but the next day, the Labor Department announced that its Producer Price Index (PPI) surged by a full 1% in July (vs. June). The core PPI, excluding food, energy, and trade margins, rose 0.9%. In the past 12 months, the PPI and core PPI have risen 7.8% and 6.1%, respectively.

The Biden Administration and the Fed are finally feeling the inflation heat, especially prices at the pump. Specifically, on Wednesday, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan said, “While OPEC+ recently agreed to production increases, these increases will not fully offset previous production cuts that OPEC+ imposed during the pandemic until well into 2022. At a critical moment in the global recovery, this is simply not enough.” Naturally, cynics (like myself) are wondering why the Biden Administration is calling for OPEC to boost production while President Biden imposed a drilling ban on federal land.

Although several states sued to overturn this drilling ban and a federal judge subsequently ruled the ban was illegal, domestic crude oil production remains approximately two million barrels a day below where it was under President Trump. The Wall Street Journal editorialized last Wednesday that, “Someone should ask Mr. Biden, on his next stop for ice cream why the President thinks oil produced by foreign dictators in Russia, Iran or Saudi Arabia is more desirable than oil drilled by American entrepreneurs.”

I should add that the Atlanta Fed is now estimating just 6% annual third-quarter GDP growth, so it seems that the Fed is trying to engineer a gradual slowdown in overall economic growth to squelch inflation.

Commodity price inflation is a worldwide problem. China’s Natural Bureau of Statistics reported that producer prices rose 0.5% in July, up from 0.3% in June. In the 12 months through July, producer prices surged 9%. Wholesale inflation in China is now running at its fastest annual pace since September 2008. Interestingly, China’s consumer prices rose only 1% in the past 12 months through July, due largely to a 3.7% decline in food prices, but excluding food, China’s consumer inflation rose at a 2.1% annual pace.

Meanwhile, port bottlenecks have the potential to worsen, since China shut down all inbound and outbound services at its Meishan terminal at its Zhoushan port last Thursday, due to a Covid-19 outbreak. Zhoushan is the third busiest port in the world. It specializes in shipping containers that go mostly to Europe and the U.S. This is the second time this year that Zhoushan had to be closed under China’s zero tolerance policy.

In other news, the Labor Department reported last Tuesday that non-farm productivity slowed to a 2.3% annual pace in the second quarter after labor costs were revised lower. First quarter productivity was also revised down to a 4.3% annual pace from 5.4%. Productivity gains can curtail job growth. Although there are 10.1 million jobs still being offered by employers, many of these jobs are for skilled positions, so businesses will likely continue to try to boost productivity to make up for this skilled worker shortage.

Finally, there appears to be gradual progress on the unemployment front, since it was announced that new claims for unemployment declined to 375,000 in the latest week, down from a revised 387,000 the previous week. Continuing unemployment claims declined to 2.886 million, down from a revised 2.98 million in the previous week. This is the third straight week that unemployment claims have been below 400,000, so despite the Covid-19 Delta variant, it appears there is steady improvement on the labor front.

EVs Won’t Solve Global Warming – or the Polar Shift!

There are some big developments brewing on the EV front. Interestingly, the high price of nickel and cobalt has apparently convinced Apple to go with iron-phosphate batteries, which are currently made by CATL in China. The patent on these iron-phosphate batteries expires in 2022, so big Korean battery makers like LG Chem and SK Innovation could then start making iron-phosphate batteries.

Apple sent a big team to South Korea recently and is lining up suppliers for its EV, which appears will initially be made by Canada’s Magna (MGA), which also makes the Jaguar iPace SUV in Austria.

At the Pebble Beach car show last weekend, Audi showed off its next super EV, the Skysphere Concept, which might utilize solid-state batteries from QuantumScape. Audi will also soon announce its Grandsphere flagship and versatile Urbansphere concept EV vehicles. So essentially, there will soon be three types of batteries used in EVs, namely (1) iron-phosphate for lower range city cars, (2) the nickel cobalt batteries that are in wide use today, and (3) solid-state batteries in the more expensive, luxury EVs.

Audi Skysphere Car Image

If anything bothered me about the Biden Administration’s executive order mandating 50% EVs by 2030, it was that Ford, GM, and Stellantis (Fiat Chrysler + PSA Group), which attended the White House ceremony, are currently only planning to use nickel cobalt batteries; so they are impeded by the acute battery shortage, largely due to a lack of battery factories as well as the high prices for nickel and cobalt.

In other words, unless new battery technologies are found and utilized, the Biden Administration’s 50% goal by 2030 is just a pipe dream, so I want to commend Apple for its foresight in utilizing iron-phosphate batteries that are safer (less fire prone) and can better accommodate fast charging.

Navellier & Associates does own Apple Computer (AAPL) in managed accounts.  We do not own Stellantis (STLA), Ford (F), Magna (MGA), Quantumscape  Kensington Capital Acquisition Corp (QS), or General Motors (GM). Louis Navellier and his family do not own Stellantis (STLA), Ford (F), Magna (MGA), Quantumscape  Kensington Capital Acquisition Corp (QS), or General Motors (GM) personally but does however own Apple Computer (AAPL)  via a Navellier managed account and in a personal account.

Last week, the United Nations also issued a big “Code Red” report, implying that we cannot reverse climate trends and will be in big trouble by 2040. I’m from Berkeley, California and I have been exposed and indoctrinated into this kind of rhetoric for over 45 years, and I can assure you that making a 9,000-pound Hummer EV is not going to save the planet – but it might be useful during a Zombie Apocalypse!

The truth of the matter is that the primary reason that we are having extreme weather – like the big freeze in Texas a few months ago, and now the massive fires in California, Greece, Turkey, and Siberia – is that the jet stream has been “oscillating.” And, it is expected to continue gyrating, since the magnetic North Pole in the past several years left the Artic, then went under Greenland, and is now in the Atlantic Ocean!

How do I know all this? Well, I did earn a geology degree in addition to my finance degrees.

Essentially, the magnetic poles “shift” every 60,000 years or so, which is how geologists date rocks – by how many times their magnetic bits have shifted. I am not certain if another magnetic pole shift is imminent, but the fact that the magnetic North Pole got up and left the Artic, means that jet stream oscillations are here for the foreseeable future, so extreme weather events are expected to continue.

Essentially, there is nothing we can do about this extreme weather, since buying a lot of Hummer EVs will not budge the weather or the magnetic North Pole. I think we need to be less hysterical about the seasonal weather and the overall climate changes. In my opinion, the latest U.N. report is just recycling old ideas and is a big fear-mongering exercise designed to raise money for various special interest groups.

All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

About The Author

Louis Navellier
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER

Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.