July 30, 2019

Fiat money has no value other than the economic activity that supports it. A hot war, if extensive, can lead to a collapse of economic activity for a protracted period of time. If that happens, the money in circulation becomes worthless and there is no economic activity to support its convertibility into goods and services. That painful cause and effect has given gold enthusiasts a lot of inspiration for the past 5,000 years.

Fiat money can work without hot wars and trade wars, but there is much to be desired on those fronts for many developed and emerging market currencies in the world today – like the Syrian pound, for instance:

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

The Syrian pound has basically lost 90% of its value, due mostly to the hot war there. Unless there is a hard peg, with external financial support to maintain it, like there is in Syria, the weaker currency and accelerating inflation rate spiral would bring about a Zimbabwe- or Venezuela-style hyperinflation.

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

Trade wars have often become hot wars. The Chinese cite the Opium Wars in defense of the present trade skirmish, in reference to when the British muscled themselves into China and Hong Kong. Citing the Opium Wars is a little ironic, as the Chinese are more at fault now, not the Trump administration.

The present situation with China is still not a full-blown trade war, in my opinion. Trade wars act like mini-hot-wars as trade frictions throttle down economic activity like a knob on a water faucet. The higher the tariffs are, the less the flow of trade and economic activity will be. Global trade is shrinking because of the Trump tariffs, but the good news is it has not nosedived yet, as in 2008 or worse, as in the 1930s.

Smoot-Hawley Was a Big Factor in the Great Depression

The most egregious trade war in the 20th Century was the one caused by the Smoot Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, when tariffs went up to 60% (see chart, below). While there have been some tariff hikes in the recent trade skirmish between the U.S. and China, I think we’re far from a full-blown trade war; but one does have to wonder about the full name of the Smoot Hawley Tariff Act, as it reads like a Trump campaign slogan, namely: “An Act To provide revenue, to regulate commerce with foreign countries, to encourage the industries of the United States, to protect American labor, and for other purposes.”

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

I don’t think the U.S. President wants to collapse global trade, but I do think he wants to end the predatory practices of the Chinese government, which are to purposefully buy from their friends and neighbors to increase their political influence and purposely buy less from the United States. If the Chinese have been getting away with this clever trade maneuver for 20 years, I understand how they would want to keep getting away with it, but Mr. Trump is the new sheriff in town, and he is not respecting old arrangements.

What most investors miss is that under the Chinese brand of state capitalism there is a lot of government intervention in their economy. Because of the strong role of government control, there is an army of state buyers that are told where to source the necessary goods and services. It’s as simple as that. There is no such army of state buyers in the United States, or any other large economy in the world.

If the Chinese wanted to dramatically reduce their trade surplus with the U.S., which should be over $400 billion in 2019, all they have to do is direct those state buyers towards America. That would cause a big political problem of not buying from where they were buying before – which is why such a change should happen over 3-5 years and not relatively soon, as requested by the Trump administration.

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

We are probably not past the point of no return yet – as evidenced by looking at the performance of the Dow Jones Industrial average – but if we were past the point of no return in trade escalation, I don’t believe that any number of Fed rate cuts would stave off a global recession and a slumping Dow.

A lot is riding on this trade negotiation and brinkmanship between The Donald and his counterpart, The Sun Tzu Disciple from Beijing. Personally, I would welcome a mutually acceptable trade deal as fast as possible. But because I am not sure that the Chinese have negotiated in good faith so far in this process, I am worried that we may open a Pandora’s box with no clear way of resolving the obvious issues.

In other words, when the cat is out of the bag, it’s very hard to put that scratching beast back in.

About The Author

Ivan Martchev

Ivan Martchev is an investment strategist with Navellier.  Previously, Ivan served as editorial director at InvestorPlace Media. Ivan was editor of Louis Rukeyser’s Mutual Funds and associate editor of Personal Finance. Ivan is also co-author of The Silk Road to Riches (Financial Times Press). The book provided analysis of geopolitical issues and investment strategy in natural resources and emerging markets with an emphasis on Asia. The book also correctly predicted the collapse in the U.S. real estate market, the rise of precious metals, and the resulting increased investor interest in emerging markets. Ivan’s commentaries have been published by MSNBC, The Motley Fool, MarketWatch, and others. All content of “Global Mail” represents the opinion of Ivan Martchev


Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for you. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Results presented include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings.

Past performance is no indication of future results.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not intended or written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE: The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Request here a list of recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. for the preceding twelve months, please contact Tim Hope at (775) 785-9416.

Marketmail Archives