by Louis Navellier
July 12, 2022
The core rate of U.S. inflation on both the consumer and wholesale level has been steadily declining since March. The fact that the U.S. dollar is strong is also helping to put downward pressure on commodity prices, like metals and lumber, which have declined substantially in recent months.
The other good inflation news is that U.S. crude oil production has risen to over 12.1 million barrels per day as of late June, compared with 11.2 million barrels per day in 2021 and 11.3 million barrels per day in 2020. Back in 2019, the U.S. produced 12.3 million barrels of crude oil a day, so moderating demand has helped make the U.S. energy independent once again. However, any excess crude oil and refined product in the U.S. is typically exported, so I expect crude oil prices to remain high through September.
There is, however, a supply disruption in Europe as the labor force at Norway’s Equinor temporarily went on strike last week, which cut off production of 89,000 barrels of crude oil per day. Normally, Norway supplies between 20% and 25% of natural gas to Europe, so LNG demand in Europe will remain strong due to the threat of further supply disruptions. Due largely to a strong U.S. dollar and fears of a global recession, crude oil prices “cracked” $100 per barrel on Tuesday, despite Norway’s supply disruption.
Crude oil prices remain above historic norms, so I expect most of our energy stocks to continue to post strong sales and earnings over the next three quarters due to favorable year-over-year comparisons.
I don’t expect we’ll see $200 oil, but JP Morgan recently predicted that global oil prices could reach almost twice that, a “stratospheric” $380 per barrel if Russia imposes retaliatory crude oil price cuts. Morgan analysts said that due to Russia’s robust fiscal position from high energy prices, they could cut their crude oil production by five million barrels per day without even damaging their domestic economy.
Excuse me, but unless JP Morgan has an informant in the Kremlin, I find a $380 per barrel prediction on crude oil prices ridiculous, even though it would certainly help my big bet in energy stocks. We now live in a world where outrageous predictions dominate the news and Internet, thanks to Google Analytics. I suspect that this outrageous $380 crude oil prediction was written merely to get “hits” on the Internet.
The other big news on the energy front was caused by the Supreme Court decision to curb the EPA’s authority over power plants, since the Obama Administration’s Clean Power Plan was not approved by Congress. This is expected to be a major boon for domestic energy production, since curbing carbon dioxide was proving to be very difficult. Even in “green” Europe, Austria, Germany, and the Netherlands are now burning more coal due to high natural gas prices, so Europe’s green agenda is now largely dead.
Currently, energy stocks are less than 5% of the weight in the S&P 500. Since Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) policies have suppressed institutional investors from investing in energy stocks, most ESG managers have had truly horrible performance this year. However, with S&P Global kicking Tesla out of its S&P 500 ESG index and adding ExxonMobil, the definition of What is ESG is now changing.
The SEC had proposed new rules for companies to disclose climate risks and greenhouse gas emissions, but in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision to curb the EPA’s power, the SEC’s new climate disclosures are expected to be aggressively challenged in federal courts. In other words, institutional investors are expected to increasingly add energy stocks due to (1) their record earnings, (2) changing ESG standards, and (3) the Supreme Court’s neutering of some leading U.S. regulatory agencies.
Last Tuesday, The Wall Street Journal had a great article about how the Fed is studying inflation anxiety. Essentially, the Fed wants to prick the inflation bubble, since if both businesses and consumers anticipate that inflation will persist, those expectations can become a drag on business and consumer confidence. Essentially, if the Fed can continue to “prick” the inflation bubble, then both business and consumer expectations should improve, which should help stimulate economic growth as confidence improves.
I will be carefully watching the analyst community, since the “boots on the ground” analyst community continues to be more optimistic than the “chicken little” top-down strategists that keep calling for a recession. Recently, both Micron Technology and General Motors have provided lower guidance, so I will be on the alert if more companies and the analyst community continue to lower guidance.
Navellier & Associates; A few accounts own Tesla (TSLA) per client request only, in managed accounts. We do not own General Motors (GM), ExxonMobile (XOM), or Micron Technology (MU). Louis Navellier does not own Tesla (TSLA), General Motors (GM), ExxonMobile (XOM), or Micron Technology (MU) personally.
Ed Yardeni (and others) Now Predict a Recession
Right now, it is a close call whether or not the U.S. will officially be in a recession this year. My favorite economist, Ed Yardeni, is now forecasting negative annual GDP growth of 2% for the second, third, and fourth quarters – which amounts to a real recession. Furthermore, the Atlanta Fed is also forecasting a second-quarter GDP contraction at an annual rate of -1.2%, vs. its previous estimate of a -1.9% decline.
All I can tell you is that inflation peaked in March, long-term Treasury bond yields peaked in June, and the Supreme Court neutered the EPA and other federal agencies enacting policies not approved by Congress; so we may be able to dodge a recession with rekindled growth in the third quarter, which would also help the Democrats in November’s mid-term election. One big (and unexpected) trigger would be a ceasefire or peace agreement in the Ukrainian war, which would likely trigger a big rally in both stocks and bonds.
Another potential “spark” to ignite the stock market could come from earnings, or a new $2,000 folding 5G iPhone announcement, or the Fed cutting back expected rate increases, or President Biden cheering up! Worst case, we can wait until a change in Congressional power after the mid-term elections and the holidays to cheer us up. In the meantime, the velocity of money, which is how fast money changes hands, has slowed dramatically, so it is imperative that velocity perks up, otherwise economic growth will stall.
The Fed’s June Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) minutes were released on Wednesday. They acknowledged that inflation represents a “significant risk,” and a recession was “certainly a possibility,” which would be dependent on factors beyond the Fed’s control, like the war in Ukraine, as well as China’s Covid lockdown policy. Specifically, the FOMC minutes stated, “Many participants judged that a significant risk now facing the committee was that elevated inflation could become entrenched if the public begins to question the resolve of the committee to adjust the stance of policy as warranted.”
The Fed minutes also discussed raising key interest rates to a “modestly restrictive level” of just under 3.5% by the end of the year, implying that the last rate increase may come at its December meeting.
Most Economic Statistics Are Turning Up
If we are in recession, you can’t tell it from the bulk of the economic statistics released last week.
On Tuesday, the Commerce Department announced that factory orders surged 1.6% in May, up from a 0.7% increase in April. This was a big surprise, since economists were only expecting a 0.5% increase in May factory orders. Shipments of manufactured goods surged 1.8% in May, while inventories rose 1.3%.
On Thursday, the Labor Department announced that weekly jobless claims rose slightly to 235,000 in the latest week, compared to 231,000 in the previous week. Continuing unemployment claims rose to 1.375 million in the latest week, compared to a revised 1.324 million the previous week. The four-week average has been slowly rising since hitting a low in early April. Although the number of job openings recently declined, the jobless rate is expected to remain low since there are more open jobs than available workers.
The Commerce Department on Thursday announced that the U.S. trade deficit narrowed for the second straight month in May. Specifically, the trade deficit declined 1.3% in May to $85.5 billion, down from a revised $86.7 billion in April. Exports rose 1.2% in May to $255.9 billion due to higher exports of crude oil and natural gas, while imports rose 0.6% to $341.4 billion. The lower trade deficit is another reason why the U.S. dollar remains strong, since a smaller trade deficit typically helps lift GDP estimates higher.
On Friday, the Labor Department announced that 372,000 payroll jobs were created in June, substantially more than the economists’ consensus estimate of 265,000. However, the April and May payrolls were revised down by a cumulative 74,000. The unemployment rate remained unchanged at 3.6%, which is historically low. The labor force participation rate declined slightly to 62.2% in June. Average hourly earnings rose by 0.3% ($0.10/hour) to $32.08 per hour and is up 5.1% in the past year.
Finally, colorful British Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, faced mass cabinet resignations last week as well as a possible “no confidence” vote from his own Conservative Party. As a result, Johnson resigned on Thursday. His eventual failing was ironically multiple “party” scandals at 10 Downing Street when the rest of Britain was locked up due to Covid-19. Furthermore, under Prime Minister Johnson, Brexit did not go smoothly due to fish rotting on docks, gas station lines due to a lack of truckers (and hiring foreign EU workers), and other trade glitches. Currently, hideous energy inflation in Britain, especially for electricity, was the final reason Johnson lost control of his party. It will be interesting to see if other politicians around the world will also lose control of their political parties due to inflationary pressures and angry constituents.
All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Also In This Issue
A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
Core Inflation is Steadily Declining
Income Mail by Bryan Perry
A Heavy Week Ahead for Inflation Hawks and Doves
Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
Beware Economic Freedom without Political Freedom
Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
A Euro Deep Below Dollar Parity is Now Likely
Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
If We Enter a Recession, Will it be Mild or Extra Strength?
View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here
Louis Navellier
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Important Disclosures:
Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.
Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.
None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.
Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.
One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.
ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:
- ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
- An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
- The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
- The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
- Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.
Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.
This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.
FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.
IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades. Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.
Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.
Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.
FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.