by Louis Navellier

June 7, 2022

Fed Chairman Jerome Powell met with President Joe Biden and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen at the White House on Tuesday. Although the executive branch is not supposed to influence the Fed, President Biden is obviously looking for some good news on inflation. Due to a strong U.S. dollar, U.S. inflation may have peaked in March or April, but prices have obviously not declined enough. As we are entering peak U.S. summer driving season, I do not expect we’ll see any energy price relief until after Labor Day.

Clearly, President Biden is looking for someone to blame for inflation, and after the Tuesday White House meeting, it looks like Treasury Secretary Yellen drew the short straw, since she did a media tour and took full responsibility for surging inflation. Specifically, Yellen said, “I think I was wrong about the path that inflation would take.” Yellen further said on a CNN interview, “As I mentioned, there have been unanticipated and large shocks to the economy that boosted energy and food prices, and supply bottlenecks, that have affected our economy badly that I, at the time, didn’t fully understand.”

The good news is that President Biden said that tackling inflation is his “top domestic policy.” The bad news is that the burden of fighting inflation falls mostly on the Fed raising key interest rates, which could depreciate asset values like homes and stock prices. The Biden Administration likes to say that inflation is a worldwide problem, but so far, he has refused to significantly boost domestic energy production, even though he allows drilling activity in marginal fields that need higher crude energy prices to be profitable.

Why European Inflation is Soaring Even More Than in America

European inflation soared to a record high annual rate of 8.1% in the eurozone in May, up from a 7.4% annual pace in April. A weak euro is one of the primary culprits. The other is the soaring cost of energy, as the European Union (EU) is still trying to wean itself off Russian energy by the end of the year.

Although a couple of EU countries close to Russia — namely Hungary and Slovakia – want extra time to switch their oil refineries away from heavy Russian crude oil, the biggest economies in the EU are cutting their Russian ties after decades of promises. Interestingly, the EU is also planning to ban insurance on EU ships that transport Russia crude oil, which triggered comments from Cyprus, Greece, and Malta.

On Thursday, Saudi Arabia said that it is ready to produce more crude oil if Russian output declines under the EU ban. Before the invasion of Ukraine, Russia accounted for approximately 10% of global crude oil production. Furthermore, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and other OPEC members on Thursday agreed to boost crude oil production by 650,000 barrels per day in July and August, well above its previous plan to add about 400,000 barrels per day. This increase for two months during the peak summer driving season may not impact crude oil prices by very much, but every little bit helps.

Some nations are using a third party to buy Russian oil. India is a major buyer of Russian crude oil and is boosting its refining capacity. India is essentially positioning itself to become a major exporter of refined crude oil products, but it’s still Russian oil, one step removed. Whether or not the EU can import oil refined in India to circumvent the EU ban on Russian crude oil remains uncertain. In the meantime, Saudi Arabia and other OPEC members are trying to make sure that the EU will not run out of crude oil.

The “ESG” Double Standard on Solar Panels vs. Fossil Fuels

The Commerce Department has been conducting an investigation into solar panel imports that could lead to heavy tariffs on Chinese solar panels. As of late Sunday night, the Biden Administration said they will not lay tariffs on Chinese solar panels, but I feel they must be very careful in their promotion of “green energy” or else the world will discover the dirty secret of China’s Uyghur slaves making these panels.

A related problem is that the ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) investment standards are controversial and changing so fast that they hardly make sense anymore. Tesla was recently booted from the S&P 500 Global ESG index for what? Making electric cars and batteries to run them? But solar panels made by Uyghur slave laborers seem to be acceptable! There is no way that the Biden Administration can promote solar energy until new international suppliers and the fledging domestic production of solar panels picks up. I should add that California and Hawaii both mandate solar energy on new home construction, but they have been largely silent on the fact that the vast majority of solar panels are made with Uyghur forced labor. ESG standards are very baffling to me and tend to give me “brain freeze”!

Speaking of Tesla, Elon Musk told his top managers at Tesla in an e-mail on Thursday that he has “super bad feelings” about the economy, and, because of that, they need to cut their staff by about 10%. Earlier, on Tuesday, Musk demanded that all Tesla employees must work at least 40 hours per week at the office and cease remote working at home, so it is possible that he wants to use that office mandate as a test to flush out the Tesla workers that are unwilling to go back to working at the office full-time.

Musk’s Thursday e-mail was titled “pause all hiring worldwide.” Considering that Tesla has new plants in Austin and Berlin that are not operating at full capacity, plus a record order backlog, any hiring freeze at this time seems a bit contradictory, especially after Ford announced on Thursday that it was adding 6,200 new workers in Michigan, Missouri, and Ohio to boost its electric vehicle (EV) production. Perhaps Tesla is continuing to have acute supply problems (especially from its Chinese suppliers), plus the high cost of lithium, nickel, and cobalt for batteries, which may partially explain Musk’s “super bad feeling.”

Jobs Continue to Grow Rapidly – Averaging Over 400,000 Per Month (Since March)

In contradiction to Musk’s Thursday memo to “pause all hiring worldwide,” the Labor Department on Friday announced that 390,000 payroll jobs were created in May, well above the economists’ consensus estimate of 328,000. The unemployment rate remained unchanged at 3.6%, which is historically in the super low “full employment” range. Average hourly earnings in May rose 10-cents (+0.3%) to $31.95 per hour. In the past 12 months through May 31, average hourly earnings rose 5.2%, down from 5.5% in April, while the Labor Force Participation rate rose slightly to 62.3%, up from 62.2% in April.

Updating past monthly data, the March payroll report was revised down to 398,000 from 428,000 jobs previously estimated), while the April total was revised up to 436,000 (from 428,000 previously), so there was a net downward revision of 22,000 jobs in the previous two months. That still yields an average gain of 408,000 jobs per month from March through May. What I found most notable in the May jobs report was that leisure and hospitality added 80,000 jobs, while transportation and warehousing added 47,000.

In other good news, consumer confidence was higher than most economists had estimated. Last Tuesday, the Conference Board announced that its consumer confidence index declined only slightly, to 106.4 in May, from a revised 108.6 in April. The “present situation” component declined to 149.6 in May from 152.9 in April, due primarily to a tightening labor market, and the “expectations” component declined to 77, from 79 in April. Also, consumers bought fewer big-ticket items like cars, homes, or large appliances.

Interestingly, home price appreciation has not yet started to slow, according to the S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller National Home Price Index, which announced on Tuesday that home price appreciation slowed to a still-torrid +20.6% rate in the past 12 months, as of March 31. Tampa passed Phoenix to score the top home appreciation rate, at +34.8%, while Phoenix posted the second fastest home appreciation at 32.4%.

On Wednesday, the Institute of Supply Management (ISM) announced that its manufacturing index improved to 56.1 in May, up from 55.4 in April. This came as a big surprise, since economists were expecting a decline to 54.5. The new orders component rose to 55.1 in May (up from 53.5 in April) and the production component rose to 54.2 (up from 53.6 in April). The fact that manufacturing activity is resurging bodes well for second-quarter GDP, but the Atlanta Fed on Wednesday reduced its estimate for second-quarter GDP growth to a +1.3% annual rate, down from its previous estimate of a +1.9% pace.

On Friday, ISM dropped the “other shoe,” when the Institute of Supply Management (ISM) announced that its non-manufacturing (service) index, representing far more jobs than manufacturing, slipped to 55.9 in May, down from 57.1 in April. Although this is the lowest reading in 15 months, any reading above 50 signals an expansion, and fully 14 of the 17 service industries they surveyed reported expanding in May.

Finally, the Labor Department on Thursday announced that its weekly unemployment claims declined to 200,000 in the latest week, compared to a revised 211,000 in the previous week. Continuing unemployment claims declined to 1.309 million, compared to a revised 1.343 million in the previous week, meaning that continuing unemployment claims are now running at their lowest pace since 1969!

Combined with the Friday jobs report, this weekly jobless claim report shows that almost anyone who wants a job can find one. That’s why I’m mystified at the low numbers on the ADP private payroll jobs report. On Thursday, ADP announced that only 128,000 private payroll jobs were created in May, well below economists’ consensus estimate of 299,000. This represents the smallest monthly gain since the pandemic began. Especially alarming is that small businesses with fewer than 50 employees lost 91,000 payroll jobs (78,000 of these jobs were with small businesses with less than 20 employees). The April ADP private payroll report was also revised lower, down to 202,000 jobs, vs. the 247,000 previously estimated. I’m beginning to wonder if this report is lagging in data retrieval since more small businesses are now hiring.

Navellier & Associates owns Ford Motor Company (F), a few clients own Tesla (TSLA), per client request in managed accounts. Louie Navellier and his family personally own Ford Motor Company (F), via a Navellier managed account, but do not own Tesla (TSLA).

All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

About The Author

Louis Navellier

Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at or by requesting a copy by emailing All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.