June 26, 2018

Some may wonder why an iconic active manager like Warren Buffett likes to tell people to buy a low-cost index fund in order to participate in the stock market. His advice has to do with minimization of costs, which adds a lot to performance over time. Still, I have never heard him say anything about buying a low-cost index ETF, which is a passive investing vehicle similar to an index fund. An ETF provides daily liquidity, whereas index mutual funds only get their NAV updated after the close of trading.

While on the surface ETFs may look superior to index funds because of this intraday pricing – and hence they have seen massive growth, to the tune of $3.6 trillion in assets in the U.S. and much bigger globally (see chart, below) – under the surface, this intraday pricing “advantage” of ETFs can get really ugly.

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary

There is no hard-and-fast rule in separating the good and bad ETFs – especially with new issues coming out every month – but after spending 20 years in this fascinating world of finance in various roles, I can tell you from experience that no more than one third of ETFs fall into the “OK” category. The rest are like a shell-game scam. (For more on this issue, see my article in Marketwatch “Opinion: This is what happens when Skynet from ‘Terminator’ takes over the stock market.”) And no, the market regulators have not done nearly enough to address these problems, which are growing bigger by the day.

Michael Lewis, who became a best-selling author with his tell-all books about the world of finance, gave a 60 Minutes interview when promoting his book on high frequency trading (HFT) called Flash Boys: A Wall Street Revolt. At the onset, the interviewer asks him, “What’s the headline here?” Michael Lewis responded: “Stock market’s rigged. The United States stock market, the most iconic stock market in global capitalism, is rigged” (the video is available on Youtube). While Lewis’ book covers HFT, all the issues outlined in this article stem from computerized trading, as it is HFT that makes ETFs possible.

There are numerous ways to “shave” nickels and dimes with bid-ask spreads, tracking errors, and the like, so in the majority of cases the arbitrageurs are the ones that make the money at the expense of individual investors. As a rule of thumb, the more liquid the ETF is when it comes to daily volumes, the more likely it is that tracking errors and bid-ask spread problems will be smaller, even though highly volatile market environments – like those in August, 2015 – showed that even liquid ETFs can have some very serious problems (see Marketwatch, “Opinion: ETFs suffer from a ‘chessboard’ problem”).

I often get this question from clients: “What is an ETP, and what is the difference between an ETN and an ETF?” An exchange-traded product (ETP) is an umbrella term for exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and exchange traded notes (ETNs). While ETNs and ETFs may look similar in the way that they are passive investing products that track indexes and provide intraday liquidity to investors, they are fundamentally different. An exchange-traded note is a liability of the issuer and is technically debt that is designed to track an index. It is much more of a black box than an exchange-traded fund, which is technically a trust full of assets, whether they are stocks, bonds, or even derivatives like futures contracts.

In many cases, ETNs tend to use more derivatives to make what is, in essence, unsecured debt track their index of choice, while ETFs may or may not use derivatives, like futures. To make matters worse, there are leveraged ETPs where the tracking error and bid-ask spread issues tend to be magnified simply due to the leverage factor. The need for ETNs arises from the desire of the issuer to corner the arbitrage market (as there is typically one arbitrageur in the face of the issuer) and as such make more money that way, where with ETFs there are multiple arbitrageurs and therefore the ability to profit from discrepancies between the NAV and the market price of the ETF is typically smaller.

While I think it is highly unlikely for policy makers to let another systemically-important firm like Lehman Brothers fail – are you following what is going on with Deutsche Bank right now – it’s bankruptcy does illustrate the fundamental flaws of ETNs (read unsecured debt). All of Lehman’s ETNs went to zero as there was no buyer to be found for its ETNs in the middle of the 2008 Wall Street crash.

As a rule of thumb, the smaller the daily volume and assets in an ETP, the bigger the problems with bid-ask spread liquidity and tracking errors. It is pretty clear to me that many ETPs are being launched so that the issuers can milk unsuspecting investors via bid-ask spread slippage and NAV arbitrage. It is almost like a carefully-designed legal shell game, where computerized trading transfers assets from unsuspecting investors in ETP products into the pockets of arbitrageurs. While legally not a scam, it acts like a scam, where the goal is not to help investors but to hoover up their nickels and dimes at very fast speeds.

An experienced  trading department can deal with this shell game due to long experience in the trenches and more sophisticated access to market data via level-2 quotes, but the individual investors who still have not mastered “All or None” and “Fill or Kill” limit orders – and dare I say still use “market orders”? – are the roadkill which keeps piling on the side of the HFT-ETF highway (for more, see our “ETF sharks” report).

A Practical Example of a “Bad” ETF

While it is not unheard of for a closed-end fund to trade with a large premium or discount to NAV due to the lack of arbitrage, it is truly bizarre to see large premiums or discounts on an ETF outside of extremely volatile environments like August 2015 or February 2018. A case in point is the ETF MG Alternative Harvest ETF in December 2017, which is marketed as a way to invest in legalizing marijuana.

Alternative Harvest Exchange Traded Fund Value Table

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

This ETF did not always trade under the ticker “MJ” on the Amex. The previous ticker was “MJX.” When we asked one of our industry sources why this ETF recently experienced a massive NAV dislocation with no particular market shock event on December 29, 2017, here is what he said:

“In a case like MJX, the Marijuana ETF, the underlying basket of stocks are smaller, illiquid Canadian-listed equities. The ETF is more liquid than the stocks, I believe, so this would fall under the first category, where NAVs drift from the underlying supply/demand issues. Naturally, market makers are experts in their products, so they will use this to their advantage to widen bid and offer spreads. Remember, the wider the interest is to keep the spread as wide as they can.”

In closing, I would like to say that Michael Lewis is right: There are massive scams going on in the stock market right now. ETF industry issues are a subset of the larger HFT problem, but the regulators are asleep at the switch. The best path forward is for trading to be controlled by experienced people, and not computers that are programmed to utilize millisecond advantages from specifically-installed shorter fiber optic cables that connect New York with Chicago in order to “legally” front-run investors.

About The Author

Ivan Martchev

Ivan Martchev is an investment strategist with Navellier.  Previously, Ivan served as editorial director at InvestorPlace Media. Ivan was editor of Louis Rukeyser’s Mutual Funds and associate editor of Personal Finance. Ivan is also co-author of The Silk Road to Riches (Financial Times Press). The book provided analysis of geopolitical issues and investment strategy in natural resources and emerging markets with an emphasis on Asia. The book also correctly predicted the collapse in the U.S. real estate market, the rise of precious metals, and the resulting increased investor interest in emerging markets. Ivan’s commentaries have been published by MSNBC, The Motley Fool, MarketWatch, and others. *All content of “Global Mail” represents the opinion of Ivan Martchev*


Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for you. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Results presented include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings.

Past performance is no indication of future results.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not intended or written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE: The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Request here a list of recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. for the preceding twelve months, please contact Tim Hope at (775) 785-9416.

Marketmail Archives