by Louis Navellier

June 1, 2022

Fortunately, energy and commodity companies are largely paid in U.S. dollars. This partially explains why inflation has peaked in the U.S. but is still running high in countries with weaker currencies. As a result, domestic stocks should continue to outperform multinational stocks for the foreseeable future.

According to S&P Global, Britain’s Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) plunged to 51.8 in May, its lowest reading in 15 months, down sharply from 58.2 in April. Although any reading above 50 still signals an expansion, clearly manufacturing activity in Britain is sputtering. By comparison, S&P Global’s PMI for the euro-zone declined less, to 54.9 in May, down from 55.8 in April; so manufacturing in the euro-zone is doing better than in Britain, but it is still slowing down. Higher costs for energy and metals are clearly hindering manufacturing in Europe, since their weak currencies are causing commodity prices to rise.

One reason why the U.S. dollar is strong is the fact that the European Central Bank (ECB) has a negative key interest rate of -0.5%. ECB President Christine Lagarde last week said that the ECB’s now-8-year experiment with negative interest rates will soon end. Specifically, Lagarde implied that the ECB will likely raise its key interest rate to zero – still not very attractive to investors – in September.

Lagarde’s interest rate guidance was very dovish, since ECB observers were expecting the ECB to end its negative rates much sooner. Interestingly, Lagarde implied that the ECB may change its rate in July but added, “Based on the current outlook, we are likely to be in a position to exit negative interest rates by the end of the third quarter.” Since the ECB is moving so slowly, I expect that the euro may hit parity with the U.S. dollar (one euro equaling one dollar, down from $1.22 a year ago) in the upcoming months.

My favorite economist, Ed Yardeni, is now estimating the chances of a recession are 40%, saying that (1) investors are in a foul mood, (2) consumer sentiment has dropped sharply, (3) regional business surveys are depressed, (4) consumers are losing purchasing power, and (5) there is a chance of a credit crunch.

In his Wednesday briefing, Yardeni said that analysts are still revising their 2022 & 2023 earnings estimates higher and there is aggressive insider buying, which bodes well for a stock market recovery.

Speaking of a stock market recovery, our friends at Bespoke Investment Group issued a report after NASDAQ’s Tuesday plunge that showed that there have only been six 30% corrections in NASDAQ and the median duration was 127 days. Coincidentally, after the Tuesday NASDAQ sell-off, the correction was 127 days old. Historically, the NASDAQ Composite has rallied by a median of 3.5% in the next three months, +6.7% in six months, and +14.4% in the following year after its six previous 30% drawdowns.

Our Stock Strategy Focuses on Inflationary Growth Sectors

Portfolios that focus on inflationary growth sectors are benefiting from high prices for copper, crude oil, natural gas, fertilizer, lithium, and other higher commodity prices. These higher prices are expected to persist as the European Union (EU) strives to break away from Russian energy sources. Normally, natural gas prices can soften during the summer months, while crude oil can ebb in the fall as seasonal demand drops; but due to all the LNG and crude oil exports to Europe, these seasonal pressures have dissipated. As a result, our big bet in energy stocks looks to be safe for the foreseeable future. As always, our best defense is a strong offense of fundamentally superior stocks that are benefiting from high energy and commodity inflation – being paid in U.S. dollars.

There is one last element boosting energy stocks, namely the ESG (Environmental, Social & Governance) overlay on public pension funds in approximately 38 states! ESG essentially banned fossil fuel investing, causing energy stocks to fall to barely 2% of the S&P 500 last year. However, energy stocks now represent approximately 5% of the S&P 500 and continue to rise steadily. The S&P 500 ESG index recently kicked out Tesla and added Exxon Mobil in its annual rebalancing, which is raising questions of what is ESG?

According to the University of Massachusetts’ 2021 Toxic Air Polluters Index, which ranks the 100 largest corporations based on 2019 data, Tesla ranked #22 in least pollution, while Exxon Mobil ranked #26. The vast majority of Tesla’s “pollution.” according to the University of Massachusetts, is attributable to its lithium-ion battery plant outside of Reno, Nevada. But doesn’t ESG want more electric cars?

Confused? We all are, including Elon Musk, who is now mocking what ESG stands for, since social and diversity standards were cited by S&P Global for Tesla being booted from the S&P 500 ESG index.

Essentially, what is happening is that since ESG funds and indices have severely lagged the S&P 500 this year, and since energy is the strongest sector, many pension funds are starting to panic. They are looking for any excuse to add energy stocks, or they risk grossly underperforming the S&P 500 and other indices.

This means that the energy stocks that were once shunned by Wall Street (remember, that is part of why Exxon-Mobil was kicked out of the Dow Jones Industrials) are now being embraced. In fact, in my view, the institutional buying pressure in energy stocks is just part of the effect of pension funds re-embracing energy stocks in their efforts to “catch up” and improve their respective performance.

In other words, we are likely still in the early innings of the resurgence of fossil fuel company stocks, a trend which is expected to persist until Europe can diversify away from Russian energy sources.

I should add that the electric vehicle (EV) revolution remains alive and well in Europe, but an acute battery shortage persists. In fact, some popular EVs now have up to a two-year waiting list. Furthermore, due to soaring prices for cobalt, lithium, and nickel, some EV manufacturers have closed their long-term order books due to the fact that they most likely have to follow Tesla and raise prices due to soaring lithium-ion battery costs. This is great news for one of my stocks, namely Chile’s Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile (SQM), which mines lithium and has a booming fertilizer business.

Overall, I want you to feel good about our fundamentally superior stocks, which more than ever, represent an oasis in a challenging stock market environment. The commodity inflation that we are prospering from is expected to persist, even though inflation may have peaked in the U.S. thanks to a strong U.S. dollar.

We can thank the Federal Reserve as well as a good U.S. economy for a strong U.S. dollar, which is causing a massive institutional shift in the components in the S&P 500. This combination should boost many of our fundamentally superior stocks substantially higher for the foreseeable future.

U.S. Economic Growth Slows, but Remains Positive

Last Tuesday, the Commerce Department announced that new single-family home sales plunged 16.6% in April to an annual pace of 591,000, which is 27% lower than 12 months ago. This represents the biggest monthly drop in nine years and substantially below economists’ consensus estimate of 749,000 unit sales.

The median new home sales price is now $450,000, up 19.6% in the past 12 months. Between these high median prices and higher mortgage rates (now 5.25%, up from just 3% at the start the year), new home sales are being priced out of affordable monthly rates for many prospective middle-class buyers.

On Thursday, the National Association of Realtors announced that pending home sales declined 3.9% in April, the sixth straight monthly decline. In the past 12 months, pending home sales have declined 9.1%. The number of existing homes for sale rose to 1.03 million, a 2.2-month supply at the current annual sales pace. Housing prices are expected to remain high until inventories reach at least a 6-month supply.

On Wednesday, the Commerce Department announced that durable goods orders rose 0.4% in April, below the economists’ consensus estimate of a 0.6% increase. Also, March durable goods orders were revised down to a 0.6% increase from the 0.8% gain previously estimated. Core durable goods in April increased 0.3%, substantially below the economists’ consensus estimate of 0.6%. Commercial aircraft orders rose 4.3% in April after falling 8.1% in March. In the wake of the big drop in new homes sales as well as decelerating durable goods orders, I expect downward revisions to second-quarter GDP growth.

I was surprised to see the Commerce Department revise its first-quarter GDP estimate slightly down to an annual decline of 1.5%, compared to its preliminary estimate of a 1.4% annual decline, blaming a drop in productivity and a record trade deficit. Fortunately, the Commerce Department reported that consumer spending rose 0.9% in April, so we should be able to skirt a recession, since 70% of GDP growth is tied to the consumer. Sure enough, on Wednesday, the Atlanta Fed revised its second-quarter GDP estimate to an annual pace of +1.8%, down from its previous estimate of a 2.4% pace, but still positive.

Also on Wednesday, the minutes for the May meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) were released, revealing a lot of hawkish talk about hiking key interest rates to a “restrictive” policy to squelch inflation. However, FOMC members also revealed that they did not want to undermine the strong recovery in the job market, so the FOMC only agreed to raise key interest rates by 0.5% at the next “couple of meetings.”  This essentially means that the Fed may pause when the Fed funds rate hits 1.75% (it is currently at 0.75%) and then reassess the situation. These FOMC minutes revealed that there are a lot of doves on the committee looking for excuses to pause after key interest rates hit just 1.75%.

On Thursday, the Labor Department announced that the latest weekly unemployment claims declined to 210,000, compared to a revised 218,000 in the previous week. Continuing unemployment claims rose to 1.346 million vs. a revised 1.315 million the previous week, so the labor market remains healthy.

Navellier & Associates owns Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile (SQM),in managed accounts. We do own Tesla (TSLA) and Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM), in managed accounts for a few accounts only. Louis Navellier does not own Tesla (TSLA) or Exxon Mobile Corp (XOM) personally but does own Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile (SQM), via a Navellier managed account.

All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

About The Author

Louis Navellier

Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at or by requesting a copy by emailing All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.