by Louis Navellier

May 9, 2023

Last Wednesday, ADP reported that private payrolls rose by 296,000 in April, substantially more than the economists’ consensus expectation of 133,000 and the highest monthly gain since July 2022. March private payrolls were revised slightly lower to 142,000, down from 145,000. Leisure and hospitality led the job increase categories with 154,000, followed by education and health services with 69,000 new jobs. The construction industry also added 53,000 jobs in April, followed by natural resources and mining with 52,0000 new jobs. Manufacturing led job losses with 38,000 and the financial sector lost 28,000 jobs.

Then, on Thursday, the Labor Department reported that weekly unemployment claims rose to 242,000 in the latest week, up from a revised 229,000 in the previous week. Continuing unemployment claims declined to 1.805 million, down from a revised 1.843 million in the previous week. This drop in continuing claims was good news, since in the previous week, it was at the highest level in 16 months.

On Friday, the major jobs report from the Labor Department reported that 253,000 payroll jobs were added in April. Like the ADP report, this was substantially higher than the economists’ consensus estimate of 185,000. However, March’s payroll was revised down to 165,000 (from 236,000 previously reported) and February payroll was revised down to 248,000 (from 326,000). After factoring in all these revisions, the unemployment rate declined to 3.4% in April, down from 3.6% in March.  Wage inflation picked up at the fastest pace in almost a year, rising by 0.5% (or 16 cents) to $33.36 per hour in April. Overall, due to a lower unemployment rate and rising wages, the payroll report was indicative of a stronger economy.

The ISM numbers were also positive. The Institute of Supply Management (ISM) manufacturing index rose to 47.1 in April, up from 46.3 in March. The “new orders” component rose to 45.7 in April from 44.3 in March, while the production component was 48.9 in April, up from 47.8. Despite these improvements, any reading below 50 signals a contraction. Of the 16 manufacturing industries ISM surveys, only five grew in April, and this marks the sixth straight month that the manufacturing sector has been below 50.

The U.S. service economy dwarfs manufacturing, so it was encouraging to see that ISM announced on Wednesday that its non-manufacturing (service) sector rose to 51.9 in April, up from 51.2 in March, the fourth straight month that the ISM service index rose, after hitting 49.2 in December. Any reading above 50 signals an expansion, so the service economy only contracted in one month. New orders rose sharply to 56.1 in April, up from 52.2 in March, while the business activity component declined to 52 in April, down from 55.4 in March. Fully 14 of the 17 service industries surveyed reported growth in April.

Another piece of good news is that the Atlanta Fed is now estimating second-quarter GDP growth at a +2.7% annual pace, more than double the 1.1% gain in the first quarter. Furthermore, first-quarter GDP growth is expected to be revised higher due to the fact that the March trade deficit declined sharply as imports declined 0.3% to $320.4 billion and exports surged 2.1% to $256.2 billion, led by vehicles, crude oil, refined products, and natural gas. Interestingly, the trade deficit with China is now at the lowest level in three years as imports of consumer goods have declined. Furthermore, due to tariffs and trade tensions with China, the U.S. is now importing more goods from India, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam.

Overall, Wall Street was depressed last Tuesday, expecting slower economic growth, which caused crude oil prices to fall dramatically. However, due to this string of positive economic indicators released from Wednesday through Friday, by Friday in the wake of the April payroll report, Wall Street was expecting robust economic growth, so crude oil prices erased the price declines earlier in the week. Any recession fears seem to have dissipated and hopefully, Wall Street will become less bi-polar in the upcoming weeks!

Facing a Banking Crisis and Debt Ceiling Debate, the Fed Should At Least “Pause” in June

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement on Wednesday, in my opinion, was a “weak” statement, since it neglected to state clearly that the Fed was done raising key interest rates, even though its previous language of a future rate hike was removed. Specifically, the phrase “some additional policy firming may be appropriate” was removed. Furthermore, since the Fed’s key interest rate remains above current Treasury yields, the Fed knows the banking system will be super restrictive and curtail credit.

Fed Chairman Jerome Powell’s press conference was also full of weak comments, since he would not commit to curtailing future rate increases. As usual, he is waiting for the “data” to come in. Fortunately, Powell said that the Fed is now “at the level” that should help inflation migrate to the 2% level. Overall, Powell does not inspire confidence, since he is very “matter of fact” and always waits to see the next tea leaves unfold. However, I did appreciate his comment that the Fed has been “sufficiently restrictive.”

The European Central Bank (ECB) also raised its key interest rate by 0.25% last Thursday. At her press conference, ECB Chair Christine Lagarde implied that the ECB was still on a “journey” to combat inflation and that more interest rate hikes would likely be forthcoming. Interestingly, at Lagarde’s press conference, she received a question about U.S. bank failures, so clearly Europeans are worried about the stability of the U.S. banking system, which will likely continue to undermine the value of the U.S. dollar.

The Fed’s favorite inflation indicator – the Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) index – rose 0.2% in March and 4.2% in the past 12 months (down from a 5.1% annual pace in February). Energy prices surged 3.7% in March, while food costs declined 0.2%. The core PCE, excluding food and energy, rose 0.3% in March and 4.6% in the past 12 months (down from 4.7% in February). There is no doubt that the core PCE is running hotter than the Fed wants to see. The only silver lining is that service costs rose 0.2% in March, cooler than in previous months. Overall, the March PCE just illustrates that inflation, especially energy costs, remains stubbornly high. The Fed knows that it cannot control food and energy inflation.

In the continuing U.S. bank crisis, PacWest Bancorp announced last week that it is in talks with several potential investors after its stock plunged. Western Alliance is another regional bank that is exploring “strategic options,” including a potential sale of all or part of its business. Banks are starting to resemble dominoes, and they are losing deposits as investors seek higher yields. Contagion fears are spreading, and the banking crisis is being exasperated by an inverted yield curve. Furthermore, opportunistic investors, like Bill Ackman, are now fueling fears that regional banks will continue to falter. Ackman tweeted that “At this rate, no regional bank can survive bad news or bad data as a stock price plunge inevitably follows, insured and uninsured deposits are withdrawn and ‘pursuing strategic alternatives’ means an FDIC shutdown over the coming weekend. And there is no incentive to bid until Sunday after the failure.”

Navellier & Associates Inc. does not own PacWest Bancorp (PACW), or Western Alliance (WAL). Louis Navellier does not own PacWest Bancorp (PACW), or Western Alliance (WAL) personally.

The next big concern for investors that like to worry is that the debt ceiling will have to be raised by Congress. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said that the Treasury Department needs the debt ceiling lifted by June 1st, since its emergency measures to circumvent the ceiling could no longer be implemented after that date. Remaining vague in her letter to House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, Yellen said, “It is impossible to predict with certainty the exact date when the Treasury will be unable to pay the government’s bills.”

President Biden has invited Congressional leaders to meet today (May 9th) to discuss the debt ceiling. House Speaker McCarthy accepted President Biden’s invitation after trying to belittle President Biden for refusing to meet for almost 100 days. McCarthy is striving to get the President to agree to some spending cuts before agreeing to lift the federal government’s debt ceiling. In the end, the federal government’s debt ceiling will get lifted, even if there is a partial government shutdown, which has happened before.

Most GDP growth is attributable to the U.S. consumer. Since the 2024 Presidential election is heating up and there may be some debates in the upcoming months, our elected leaders usually start sucking up to voters. I am keenly aware that many voters do not like the current leading candidates or think they are too old, but the candidate with the most energy and the most positive spirit should lift consumer confidence.

Energy Prices Swing Wildly with Changing Growth Expectations

Diesel prices have declined below gasoline prices in the U.S. Slowing freight traffic is being cited as the primary cause. Despite the plunging inventory of crude oil and refined products in the past several weeks, crude oil prices fell sharply last week on global economic growth concerns as central bankers met to discuss additional key interest rates hikes. Higher interest rates are curtailing consumer spending and even Enphase Energy warned of slower solar and powerwall installations due to pinched homeowners. Tesla has also warned that high rates are curtailing its electric vehicle sales, but energy recovered Friday.

Ironically, as Memorial Day approaches, I expect that my Big Energy Bet could pay off as fossil fuel demand soars. I should also add that my energy stocks continue to announce better-than-expected earnings in the past several days. Bloomberg also reported that crude oil prices are expected to rise in the upcoming years due to a lack of investment in new fields as well as the Permian Basin peaking.

The U.S. Navy reported on Wednesday that Iran seized a second oil tanker, which apparently was not carrying much, if any, crude oil. Specifically, the Niovi, a Panama-flagged oil tanker, was sailing from Dubai to the port of Fujairah in UAE, but it was seized by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard in the Gulf of Oman. The Niovi is a very large crude carrier (or VLCC) that can carry over 2 million barrels, but had been in drydock getting maintenance in Dubai and was headed to Fujairah, a fueling hub for VLCCs.

The Navy said, “A dozen IRGCN fast-attack craft swarmed the vessel in the Strait (of Hormuz),” and “forced the oil tanker to reverse course” towards Iranian territorial waters. Roughly a third of all oil tankers travel through the Strait of Hormuz. The other tanker (Chevron chartered) that Iran seized is being held at the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas. Iran’s ultimate goal for these tanker seizures remains unknown.

Russian oil data is now showing that the number of inactive wells is at the highest level in 10 months. In March, 18.1% of Russia’s wells were inactive, up from 15.6% in February. Russia exported more than 4 million barrels a day of seaborne crude oil at the end of April. India and China have geared up to export refined products, like diesel. Latin America has also become a big market for Russian diesel exports.

Bloomberg is a big fan of electric vehicles (EVs), and they like to report on climate change, but the inventory of unsold EVs is rising fast. Cargurus has reported a nationwide glut of unsold new EVs for sale, like 5,724 VW ID.4s, 5,166 Hyundai IONIQ 5s, 4,294 Mercedes EQS’s, 3,277 Ford Mach-e SUVs, 2,127 Kia Niros, 1,613 Hyundai IONIQ 6s, 970 Mercedes EQE SUVs, and a variety of other models for sale plus used models. This growing inventory of unsold EVs, bodes poorly for both Rivian and Lucid, since these EVs demand premium prices above established brands like Audi and Mercedes. I should add that Audi is starting to offer 0.99% financing to move its growing inventory of EVs.

Last Tuesday, Ford announced up to an 8% price reduction on its standard range Mach-e, since this version is switching to cheaper iron phosphate (LFP) batteries. This is Ford’s second price reduction this year for the Mach-e. Ford’s Mach-e sales have declined about 20% this year compared to a year ago, but the company is trying to boost Mach-e production at its Mexican plant, so its order banks are expected to reopen now that Ford has secured LFP batteries from CATL. The long-range Mach-e models will continue to utilize lithium-ion batteries. Frankly, the glut of EVs is getting scary for auto dealers. Ford lost $722 million in the first quarter on its EVs, so if a legacy auto manufacturer cannot make money in EVs, it may be impossible for startups like Rivian and Lucid. As a result, a big EV shakeout could arrive soon.

Navellier & Associates does not own Ford Motor Co. (F), Chevron (CHV), Rivian Automotive (RIVN), or Lucid Group (LCID). Louis Navellier does not own Rivian Automotive (RIVN), Ford Motor Co. (F), Chevron (CHV), or Lucid Group (LCID) personally.

All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

About The Author

Louis Navellier

Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at or by requesting a copy by emailing All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.