by Gary Alexander

May 19, 2020

The more I read the papers, the less I comprehend
The world and all its capers, and how it all will end.

–The opening lines of “Our Love is Here to Stay,”
the final song George & Ira Gershwin wrote
before George’s sudden death in July 1937

The daily news reports, as Ira Gershwin implied 83 years ago, must be designed to confuse us. The science on both sides of coronavirus reporting is confusing, like expert witnesses called by the plaintiff or defense attorneys in a court case. One month, masks are considered worthless, the next month they are mandatory. One month we build dozens of emergency hospitals, even massive medical ships; the next month they all stand empty, while established hospitals lay off skilled staff and file for bankruptcy.

One month, stocks fall 35%. The next month they rise 35%. Who’s in charge here?

This is why I prefer to read history instead of the news. The daily and weekly press seem clueless, or, more accurately, driven by a hidden or obvious agenda. One side bends the data for lockdown, the other for opening up. The facts may be close to true on both sides, but the data is warped to fit a rhetorical case.

Take The Economist’s “Gap,” or Time’s “This Isn’t It,” or The Week’s “Free Fall” covers, for instance:

Agenda Driven News Coverage Image

The Economist came in my mail May 9th. The latter two came May 16th. Taken together, they comprise another contrarian buy signal. First, The Economist’s editors ought to know better. Their staff is loaded with skilled economists and market historians who know that the stock market is an advance indicator of recovery, yet their cover and lead editorial speak of financial markets “out of whack with the economy. Something has to give.” They should know that the market almost always leads the GDP turnaround.

Surely The Economist’s editors are aware that the Dow Jones Industrial Average hit bottom in July 1932 at 41.2, while the economy continued to contract well into 1933, while the Dow more than doubled to 108.7 in a huge “gap” between stocks and the economy. The gap did not turn out to be “dangerous” at all.

The Dow rose all the way to 194.4 on March 10, 1937 when it suddenly turned south, anticipating a second Depression, running May 1937 to June 1938, when unemployment shot back up to 19%. (That must have been what Ira Gershwin was writing about when he “couldn’t comprehend the papers.”)

I just looked at the four biggest, steepest postwar recessions, and in each case the stock market bottomed out over three months before the recession ended. Looking back in terms of severity, the recessions were:

  • December 1, 2007 to June 30, 2009 (10% peak unemployment and -5.1% GDP decline). The stock market turned around March 6, 2009 – 115 days before the recession ended.
  • July 1, 1981 to November 30, 1982 (10.8% peak unemployment and -2.7% GDP decline). The stock market turned around August 12, 1982 – 110 days before the recession ended.
  • November 1, 1973 to March 31, 1975 (9.0% peak unemployment and -3.2% GDP decline). The stock market bottomed on December 6, 1974 – 117 days before the recession ended.
  • August 1, 1957 to April 30, 1958 (7.5% peak unemployment and -3.7% GDP decline). The stock market bottomed out on October 22, 1957 – over six months before the recession ended.

By this history, we see that today’s market anticipates a recovery beginning in the third quarter of 2020. If the economic reopening fails this quarter, or if the virus escalates its attack, all bets are off, and we may see a retest of the lows, but for now the market is telling us it has confidence in the return of business.

The cover of “The Week” is clearly designed to scare you. There is no comparison between 2020’s economic fundamentals and those of the 1930s, when the Federal Reserve raised interest rates and cut money supply. Today’s recession was engineered from the top, amid a record-long boom-time recovery, with the Fed and Congress adding over $7 trillion in new liquidity to the economy in just two months!

A Completely Different Global Reaction to a Now-Forgotten China Virus 50 Years Ago

The Hong Kong Flu of 1968-70 killed 100,000 in the U.S., mostly in late 1968, and then 30,000 in the U.K. between July 1969 and the end of 1970, and at least one million and perhaps up to four million worldwide. At that time, I was working in a news bureau and few articles covered the flu. There was no global panic, with no business shutdowns to speak of. There was some mask-wearing but little social distancing. There was an early wave, then a bigger second wave but most people went about normal life.

London Office Workers during Hong Kong Flu Image

Like coronavirus, the 1968 outbreak started in China. It quickly engulfed the city of Wuhan, according to an article in The Wall Street Journal April 24, 2020, “before racing across the globe on commercial flights and ships, eventually killing more than 1 million people, over 100,000 of them in the U.S.”

There were a lot of other events going on then. “In 1968-70, news outlets devoted cursory attention to the virus while training their lenses on other events such as the moon landing and the Vietnam War, and the cultural upheaval of the civil-rights movements, student protests, and the sexual revolution,” according to the Journal. Today, of course, we’re hooked on 24-hour cable news, online resources, and social media.

The result, as Ira told us: “The more I read the papers, the less I comprehend the world and all its capers.”

Try reading some history instead, with a special focus on how markets anticipate history.

All content above represents the opinion of Gary Alexander of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

Also In This Issue

A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
Deflation is Spreading

Income Mail by Bryan Perry
Here’s Hoping the Reopening Goes According to Plan

Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
This Market Recovery is Justified by History

Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
The Banks Are Likely to Take Out their March Lows

Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
Just What Does “Overbought” Mean?

View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here

About The Author

Gary Alexander

Gary Alexander has been Senior Writer at Navellier since 2009.  He edits Navellier’s weekly Marketmail and writes a weekly Growth Mail column, in which he uses market history to support the case for growth stocks.  For the previous 20 years before joining Navellier, he was Senior Executive Editor at InvestorPlace Media (formerly Phillips Publishing), where he worked with several leading investment analysts, including Louis Navellier (since 1997), helping launch Louis Navellier’s Blue Chip Growth and Global Growth newsletters.

Prior to that, Gary edited Wealth Magazine and Gold Newsletter and wrote various investment research reports for Jefferson Financial in New Orleans in the 1980s.  He began his financial newsletter career with KCI Communications in 1980, where he served as consulting editor for Personal Finance newsletter while serving as general manager of KCI’s Alexandria House book division.  Before that, he covered the economics beat for news magazines. All content of “Growth Mail” represents the opinion of Gary Alexander

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at or by requesting a copy by emailing All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.