by Gary Alexander

May 18, 2021

Capitalism is the only system that works – it’s just a matter of which type of capitalism works better, the  “Asian” model of authoritarian leadership and energetic, unfettered (less regulated) capitalism, or the Western model with regulation and democratic political control. China exemplifies the first, America the second, but both economies are clearly a mixture of socialism and capitalism – or “mixed” economies.

China will continue to be our most significant global competitor, but they had to adopt capitalism to reach the #2 slot. They learned the hard way that socialism doesn’t work. In 1978 (Data from this section comes from Foreign Affairs, Jan/Feb 2020 issue, “The Future of Capitalism,” mostly from the first essay, “The Clash of Capitalisms” by Branko Milanovic), almost 100% of China’s output – what little there was – came from the public sector. The public sector now produces under 20%.

In 1970, the West produced 56% of global output vs. only 19% in Asia (including Japan). Fifty years later, Asia produces more than the West – 43% vs. 37% – due mostly to China’s adoption of capitalism. Then came the Four Tigers, then India, Vietnam, and other Asian economies. From 1990 to 2017, China averaged 8% annual growth rates, Vietnam averaged 6%, while the U.S. averaged only 2% per year.

Chinese Growth Bar Chart

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

Despite its top-down political system, China’s economy is more capitalist than ours in some ways. For instance, their top capital-gains tax rate is 20%, while President Biden is trying to double our rate to around 40%, even though the Tax Foundation said that such a high capital gains tax rate would reduce tax revenues by $124 billion over the next 10 years. Even the Penn Wharton Budget Model, often used by Democrat economists, said tax revenues would fall $33 billion under that load, so who is more capitalist?

When our group of 30 investors was touring out-of-the-way spots in China 25 years ago, we saw China’s entrepreneurial spirit first-hand. This contrasted sharply with a similar trip about 30 of us made to Soviet Russia in 1986 under the leadership of free-market economist Lawrence Reed. Hardly anyone looked us in the eye there. Russians seemed to have zero business initiative, but in China, businesses were popping up everywhere, and nearly everyone looked us in the eye and waved hello. Buildings were popping up everywhere – the crane was “the national bird” of China. However, there was no protection of property rights along the way. Fake “Disney” or “Apple” products were clearly visible in several Chinese cities.

Fake Products Storefronts in China Image

It’s easy to find fault with China’s product theft and human rights abuses, but I try to look at China as America was 100 years ago. China went through its own Civil War – a terrible time of starvation (1959-62) then Cultural Revolution (1966-76), about a century after our own Civil War and Reconstruction.

Previously, several European nations (notably England, France, Germany, and Russia) occupied China, as six foreign flags once tried to take over North America. Likewise, China staged an industrial rebirth under Deng and his successors (1979-2014) just as America staged its own Industrial Revolution (1879-1914).

In 1912, America elected a southern collectivist President, Woodrow Wilson: 1913 gave birth to Income Taxes, the Federal Reserve, and the birth of big central government. Likewise, a century later, China chose Xi Jinping in 2012 and he has revived the military, detained and tortured minorities, and escalated debt.

Imagine China as a young United States a century ago…

The United States, 1750-1921 China, 1850-2021
1750-1845:  Occupied or Threatened by European Nations 1850-1945:  Occupied by Europe or Japan
1860-1876:  Civil War and Reconstruction 1960-1976:  Cultural Revolution
1878-1912:  Industrial Revolution: Unfettered Capitalism 1978-2012:  Industrial Revolution
1912-1921:  Under Wilson: Central control, war, racism, pandemic 2012-2021:  All the same under Xi

If you imagine China today as America was a century ago, perhaps there is some hope. America grew out of its past excesses, and maybe China will, too. America was not fair or just to all its people 100 years ago. Our businesses often ran unfettered and unregulated. Maybe China will learn its lessons, as we have.

Deep Scars from the Cultural Revolution Provide the Greatest Hope for Peace

In the last two weeks, I delivered two rather downbeat reviews of China/U.S. relations, but I want to conclude this series on a more hopeful note, since today marks the 25th anniversary of the end of our three-week China tour in 1996, which doubled as the 30th anniversary of China’s Cultural Revolution and the 20th anniversary of its end. Those painful memories are our best insurance against its repeat.

Before describing the tour, let me introduce our guide, whose life experiences made our tour possible. Keren Su was born in Hangzhou in 1952. He remembered the starvation of the Great Leap Forward (1958-62), when his classmates often “disappeared” (30 million died of starvation). The Cultural Revolution struck in May 1966, when he was 14. It destroyed his family and lasted 10 painful years.

On May 16, 1966, Mao Zedong’s wife, Jiang Qing, issued her stunning circular against “scholar tyrants.” Within days, by May 20, young (teenaged) Red Guards were closing down schools, starting with middle schools. Keren Su’s parents, teachers, were arrested, and all schools became deserted. Keren Su was soon sent to a labor camp in the far north, in frozen Harbin, for eight years. In winter months, the temperature seldom rose above zero in Harbin, and they had little or no heat. He still suffers the residual effects.

Then, to make a name for himself, Keren Su bicycled around the circumference of China on a one-speed bike. From that fame, he escaped China to become a noted photographer and tour guide, taking us places no Westerner had ever seen. In the first week, for instance, we spent most of our time in the rural villages of the Maio and Bouyei minorities in hilly Guizhou, China’s poorest province. In one full day, we took a four-hour bus ride each way to a village no Westerner had ever seen to witness a spring festival. Then, we flew up to Chengdu in heavily populated Sichuan Province, where the core of our China story came clear:

  • On Sunday May 5, 1996, we visited the Azalea Branch school, but our bus couldn’t negotiate the narrow road, so we set out to walk. As soon as we turned a corner, we were greeted by a quarter mile of children on both sides of a narrow path waving freshly cut blooming azalea branches chanting a song, “Welcome, friends, warmest welcome.” As we reached the school, a group of us stood on a brick wall and spoke to them through Keren Su’s translation. They sang back to us. Then we tried singing back to them. A fellow American and I had prepared a duet, “Hi Neighbor” as our greeting. The assembled children then shocked us by singing Auld Lang Syne in Chinese. There wasn’t a dry eye as we sang it back to them in English. We then toured their school. There was no library, no computer, no teaching aids, and terrible bathrooms. We made a donation of $100 for books, which didn’t seem like much, but they assured us that 800 yuan (the equivalent) could fund a large library.
  • On Monday, May 6 in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, twice within an hour we were stopped by older citizens and thanked – for saving their lives! As we boarded our bus, our tour guide brought us a huge bouquet of flowers from local citizens who said, through translators, “We understand there are some among you who fought in World War II. On behalf of the citizens of Chengdu, we offer our thanks to you for saving us from the Japanese.” (Yes, we had some WW2 vets.) Then, an hour later, at a tea garden at lunch, a group of older pipe-smoking Chinese men said the same thing. As it turns out, U.S. General Claire Chennault and the Flying Tigers volunteered for service in China in 1937, long before Pearl Harbor. They were instrumental in stopping Japan’s advances up the Yangtze River.

Later that week, on May 8, in Chongqing, we visited the Stilwell Foreign Language School, which taught English and featured the U.S. and Chinese flags at equal height, in honor of U.S. General Joe Stilwell, who is still honored in China. This underlines why many older Chinese love Americans. Unlike Britain, France, Germany, Russia, or Japan, we never attacked China and often tried to help.

Chinese Sights in 1976 Image

What happened in 1976 to end the Cultural Revolution? As strange as it seems in a land of atheists, a “Mandate from Heaven” signaled the change. Heaven spoke first through the largest meteor shower ever seen in China, in April 1976, then the deadliest earthquake in the 20th Century. It struck at 3:42 am on July 28. A magnitude 7.8 earthquake hit Tangshan, 110 miles east of Beijing, killing over 240,000.

Mao was near death and his wife, Jiang Qing, headed a Gang of Four in line to succeed him. Due to this Mandate of heaven, however – and fatigue from the Cultural Revolution – the Chinese people would have none of Lady Mao. Banners declared “Deep Fry the Gang of Four in Oil.” Mao basically said the same thing: In late 1975, Mao issued his final official slogan, dubbed “Three Mores and One Less:”

“Zhou [En Lai] should rest more; Deng [Xiao Ping] should work more, Wang [Hongwen, youngest of the Gang of Four] should study more; and Jiang Qing should talk less.” – Mao

April Meteor Shower and July Earthquake - Signs from Heaven Images

This Mandate of meteors, quakes, the death of Mao (September 9), and his deathbed admonition to his wife to shut up led to the arrest of the Gang of Four on October 6 and the end of the Cultural Revolution.

As a result of that trauma, today’s older Chinese will never allow another despot to steal their future, but these Baby Boomers, like ours, are aging, so the question remains about how the young will respond. Alas, that future now looks grim as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has forbidden discussion of these painful events as “historical nihilism.” The South China Morning Post reported last week that the CCP deleted two million online posts for such nihilism as the centennial of the CCP approaches in July. Imagine forbidding blacks from discussing slavery or Jews from mentioning the Holocaust. Same thing.

On Friday, May 17, 1996, our last day in China, we awoke to the CNN report that this day marked the 30th anniversary of the start of the Cultural Revolution. They went on to report that older Chinese were celebrating that event through work camp “reunions” all over China, as we met in our closing banquet that night in the Jinjiang Hotel, Shanghai, once known as Cathay Mansions, where Zhou Enlai and President Richard Nixon had signed their historic Shanghai Communique in February 1972.

After three life-changing weeks in this emerging colossus, we offered toasts to our Chinese hosts as two musicians (flute and cello) sensed our departure and serenaded us with “Going Home,” the theme from Dvorak’s “New World” Symphony. We flew home to America, 25 years ago today, wiser about the “real China” and the billion-plus people who love Americans and capitalism. That is our best hope for peace.

All content above represents the opinion of Gary Alexander of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

About The Author

Gary Alexander
SENIOR EDITOR

Gary Alexander has been Senior Writer at Navellier since 2009.  He edits Navellier’s weekly Marketmail and writes a weekly Growth Mail column, in which he uses market history to support the case for growth stocks.  For the previous 20 years before joining Navellier, he was Senior Executive Editor at InvestorPlace Media (formerly Phillips Publishing), where he worked with several leading investment analysts, including Louis Navellier (since 1997), helping launch Louis Navellier’s Blue Chip Growth and Global Growth newsletters.

Prior to that, Gary edited Wealth Magazine and Gold Newsletter and wrote various investment research reports for Jefferson Financial in New Orleans in the 1980s.  He began his financial newsletter career with KCI Communications in 1980, where he served as consulting editor for Personal Finance newsletter while serving as general manager of KCI’s Alexandria House book division.  Before that, he covered the economics beat for news magazines. All content of “Growth Mail” represents the opinion of Gary Alexander

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.