May 14, 2019

I do not believe the stock market expected the recent reneging of the trade deal by the Chinese, due to the overselling of progress in the trade deal by president Trump and some of his administration officials. That the Chinese would come back in late April to renegotiate terms that they had agreed to in January and February is not surprising. It is the number of terms that they wanted to renegotiate that raises eyebrows. Virtually every major concession they had made for the previous three months was suddenly off the table: Forced transfer of technology, changing of Chinese laws to protect foreign intellectual property and the increased purchases by Chinese state buyers to be sourced from the U.S. – all are suddenly in limbo.

The conclusion one could draw from this is that the Chinese never wanted to make a trade deal but only buy time while they dealt with their domestic economic problems. Or, as Mr. Trump so eloquently put it in his relentless Twitter diatribes: “I think that China felt they were being beaten so badly in the recent negotiation that they may as well wait around for the next election, 2020, to see if they could get lucky & have a Democrat win, in which case they would continue to rip-off the USA for $500 Billion a year…”

To be fair, both Democratic and Republican administrations are to blame for letting China play this clever game of purposefully buying more from their neighbors and key trading partners, to increase political influence, while buying less from the United States – because they could get away with it. That game is up as there is a new sheriff in town and he is not respecting old arrangements. His name is Donald Trump.

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary

The biggest current account deficit as a percentage of GDP that we have seen in recent years is 6% during the George W. Bush administration. That coincided with oil going to $150 and U.S. crude oil production at multi-decade lows. Back then, if the U.S. economy grew and crude oil production fell, the trade deficit grew, as we had to import the oil. But crude oil production has tripled since 2008 due to the shale boom, so the overall trade deficit has shrunk from 6% of GDP to 2.4%, but oil is only part of the problem.

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

As the overall trade deficit has shrunk as a percentage of GDP, the U.S. bilateral trade deficit with China has exploded. China is the biggest driver of the overall U.S. trade deficit as the U.S. economy grows – GDP is up 50% since 2008. Many electronic goods, like HDTVs and iPhones, are no longer made in the U.S., so our imports from China grow. If China does not divert their army of state buyers to buy more from the U.S., as they have been doing for at least 15-20 years, the trade deficit is guaranteed to expand.

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

I think that the trade deal can still be saved, but I also believe that the Trump administration oversold its progress. Up until a couple of weeks ago, officials described it as “90% done,” or “on the 5-yard line.” On the other hand, I also believe it is plausible that they were misled by China, who agreed on a number of key concessions and in a calculated manner reneged on them in order to see if they can get away with it.

Not with a President like Donald Trump, they can’t.

A Hard Landing in China is a Matter of When, Not If

I have been amazed at the ability of Chinese authorities to arrest any economic downturn. I am beginning to think the Chinese government thinks that they can eliminate the economic cycle and fuel a perpetual economic expansion. I do not believe that they can do that, but I do believe they believe they can do it.

Every time the Chinese economy weakens, Beijing injects new loans via lending quotas, reserve ratio cuts for banks and other interventions. (In late 1993, they devalued the yuan to the tune of 34% in one move.)

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

These aggressive monetarist interventions in the Chinese economy have helped create one of the biggest credit bubbles the world has ever seen. As the Chinese economy has grown from a little over $1 trillion in the year 2000 to over $13 trillion in 2018, the total value of credit in the Chinese financial system has increased over 40-fold (to 300%+ of GDP), if one counts their infamous shadow banking system.

Amid this high level of indebtedness, a major trade war can cause their credit bubble to burst. This is why I believe the Chinese have every incentive to make a trade deal. Watch the value of the Chinese yuan, which weakened notably to close at 6.84 last Friday, and the level of foreign exchange reserve outflows, which resumed in April. A major escalation in trade-talk rhetoric can turn this trade conflict into a major economic event for China. It’s not too late to save the deal, but a lot can change in the next six months.

About The Author

Ivan Martchev

Ivan Martchev is an investment strategist with Navellier.  Previously, Ivan served as editorial director at InvestorPlace Media. Ivan was editor of Louis Rukeyser’s Mutual Funds and associate editor of Personal Finance. Ivan is also co-author of The Silk Road to Riches (Financial Times Press). The book provided analysis of geopolitical issues and investment strategy in natural resources and emerging markets with an emphasis on Asia. The book also correctly predicted the collapse in the U.S. real estate market, the rise of precious metals, and the resulting increased investor interest in emerging markets. Ivan’s commentaries have been published by MSNBC, The Motley Fool, MarketWatch, and others. All content of “Global Mail” represents the opinion of Ivan Martchev


Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for you. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Results presented include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings.

Past performance is no indication of future results.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not intended or written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE: The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Request here a list of recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. for the preceding twelve months, please contact Tim Hope at (775) 785-9416.

Marketmail Archives