by Louis Navellier

May 11, 2021

The big news last week was that the market fell when Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen apparently forgot that she is no longer the Fed Chair and said on Tuesday that, “It may be that interest rates will have to rise somewhat to make sure that our economy doesn’t overheat, even though the additional spending is small relative to the size of the economy.”  These comments are not consistent with Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, who has not signaled any tapering or key interest rate increases. Although technically the Fed is under Secretary Yellen’s supervision, her comments threaten the Fed’s independence… and are baffling.

Yellen later issued a clarification, saying, “I don’t think there’s going to be an inflationary problem, but if there is, the Fed can be counted on to address it.” She also said that she sees some price pressure over the next six months, largely due to supply-chain bottlenecks, higher energy prices, and demand for labor. The bottom line is that Secretary Yellen is sticking to the Fed’s prediction that inflation will be “transitory.”

This is a good time to remind you that when Janet Yellen was the Fed Chair (February 2014 to February 2018), she was called the “fairy godmother” of the stock market by Ed Yardeni and other economists. I, for one, am extremely comfortable with Janet Yellen as Treasury Secretary and believe that she will be sprinkling “fairy dust” on both the stock and bond markets in the upcoming months and years in office.

The latest example of this fairy dust is the 10-year Treasury bond yield, which has been meandering lower in recent days. On Maria Bartiromo’s show on Fox Business on Thursday, I said that someone (most likely the Fed) is clearly intervening to keep 10-year Treasury bond yields low (under 1.6%), but I also admitted that 10-year bond yields could rise to the 2% level as inflationary pressures heat up.

Speaking of the Fed, the Atlanta Fed now estimates that second-quarter GDP is growing at an astonishing annual rate of 11% (revised on Friday, down from its previous estimate of an even more astonishing 13.6%)!  Robust consumer spending, plus the manufacturing backlog, are expected to act as a “one-two punch” to propel second-quarter GDP growth, which will also likely be fueled by inventory rebuilding.

How I Usually Resolve the Mixed Messages in the Jobs Reports

The labor market dominated the news last week. As usually happens in the first week of the month, the ADP report on private payrolls comes out on Wednesday, followed by the Labor Department’s more comprehensive jobs report on Friday. First, on Wednesday, ADP reported that a whopping 742,000 private sector jobs were created in April, which was the largest monthly job increase in seven months.

The bulk (over 85%) of these new jobs were created by the service sector (i.e., 636,000 jobs), led by leisure and hospitality jobs. However, the goods sector also created 106,000 jobs, of which 41,000 were in the construction sector. Also notable was that job creation was robust across the sectors, by size – in small (under 49 employees), medium-sized (50 to 499 employees), and large businesses (over 500 employees). Clearly, job creation is booming, which bodes well for continued strong GDP growth.

On Thursday, the Labor Department announced that weekly unemployment claims declined to 498,000 in the latest week, compared to a revised 590,000 in the previous week. This is the first time that weekly unemployment claims have fallen below 500,000 since March 2020, representing a new post-pandemic low. Interestingly, continuing unemployment claims actually rose slightly to 3.69 million vs. a revised 3.653 million in the previous week. Economists were expecting weekly and continuing unemployment claims to come in at 538,000 and 3.62 million, respectively, so the lower weekly claims were a big surprise, while the higher-than-expected continuing claims raised some lingering concerns.

Wednesday’s ADP report created giddy expectations of one million or more total jobs created in April, counting all sectors, but the shocking news was that the Labor Department reported on Friday that only 266,000 payroll jobs were created in April, which was barely one-fourth the one million payroll jobs that some economists expected. Clearly, some economic forecasters cannot hit the broad side of a barn!

Hospitality created 331,000 jobs in April, while professional & business services lost 111,000 jobs. Courier jobs fell by 77,000 in April, while manufacturing lost 18,000 jobs. Even healthcare shed 4,000 jobs. These numbers make no sense at all to me. Are couriers and manufacturers closing doors? I doubt it.

When it comes to any big conflict between the ADP jobs report and the Labor Department, I tend to side with ADP, since they compute from hard data – payroll checks – while the Labor Department is based on reports which trickle in at various speeds, subject to massive revisions in future months. Besides, some of these April numbers look particularly suspicious, so I expect we will see massive upward revisions in the April payroll report during the first weeks of June and July. For instance, the February payrolls were just revised up to 536,000 (from 468,000 previously estimated), while March payrolls were revised down to 770,000 (from 916,000 previously estimated). Confused?  We all are, especially the Labor Department.

I think we can ignore the April payroll report, since I think it will likely be revised upward next month!

Most Other Economic Statistics Look Strong

The Commerce Department recently announced that household income soared 21.1% in March, due largely to the federal stimulus checks that were sent out. This was the largest monthly surge in household income ever recorded – ever since records commenced in 1959. The personal savings rate surged to 27.6% in March, up from 13.9% in February. These are massive numbers, unprecedented in history.

Consumer spending surged 8.1% in March and is expected to persist in upcoming months. Consumers bought predominantly big-ticket items in March, since spending on services only rose 2.2%.

The Institute of Supply Management (ISM) manufacturing index hit a 37-year high in March, so it was expected to cool off in April, and it did, declining to 60.7 in April from an over-heated 64.7 in March. Any reading over 50 signals an expansion, so manufacturing activity remains healthy. The new orders component declined to 64.3 in April, down from an incredible 68 in March. The production component slipped to 62.5 in April, down from a stunning 68.1 in March. The best news was that the backlog component rose to 68.2 in April, up from 67.5 in March, boosted by supply chain bottlenecks that have plagued the auto industry. I expect manufacturing to stay strong due to strong demand and order backlogs.

The ISM service sector also hit a new all-time high in March, at 63.7, so it was bound to correct in April. On Wednesday, ISM announced that its non-manufacturing (service) sector index decelerated slightly to 62.7 in April. Any reading over 50 signals an expansion, so the service sector remains very healthy. However, economists were expecting the April ISM service index to rise to 64.3, so they were surprised by the decline. The big culprit was the new orders component, which declined to 63.2 in April from an all-time high of 67.2 in March. Inventory depletion appears to be the primary culprit. Since inventories have to be replenished, I expect the ISM services index will continue to grow in the upcoming months.

The Commerce Department announced on Tuesday that U.S. trade surged in March as exports rose 6.6% to $200 billion and imports increased 6.3% to $274.5 billion. Any time both exports and imports are rising is indicative of both worldwide and domestic economic growth. The difference represents a “deficit” of $74.7 billion. Technically, some economists may trim their first-quarter GDP estimate due to the high deficit in March. However, looking forward, second-quarter GDP growth is looking incredibly strong.

How the Automotive Industry Has Changed Due to Supply-Chain Disruptions

The Wall Street Journal reported last week that the automotive industry is moving away from “just in time” delivery, due to acute plastic and semiconductor shortages. The disruptions in the global supply chain are forcing the automotive industry to use suppliers closer to their plants, especially regarding the heavy batteries that are used in hybrid and electric vehicles (EV).

Battery pack production at the new Tesla plant in Berlin hit a “glitch” and caused the opening of this crucial manufacturing plant for Tesla to be postponed several months, until at least January 2022. But frankly, this is just one of many delays associated with battery production that is expected to slow down the transition to EVs due to shortages of cobalt, neodymium, and other rare earth materials. The Financial Times recently reported that cobalt prices have risen 40% so far this year, so do not be surprised if more auto manufacturers follow Tesla’s Shanghai plant and make lower-priced, lower-range EVs without cobalt.

Interestingly, Porsche recently announced that it intends to make its own “high performance batteries” rather than just buy batteries from its parent, VW Group (VWAGY). Porsche wants to be on the forefront of high-performance battery production, just like it is now known for its high-performance engines.

Since VW Group has invested heavily in QuantumScape (QS) to commercialize solid-state batteries, it makes sense that Porsche would be the first VW division to potentially help develop and manufacture solid-state batteries. I should add that VW Group’s “Artemis” project is developing a state-of-the-art electric vehicle (EV) platform that will have Audi, Bentley, and Porsche versions that are expected to be the first mass-production EVs with solid-state batteries.

The most shocking EV news last week was that Stellantis (formerly Chrysler Fiat & France’s PSA before merger) announced it will no longer need to buy Tesla CO2 credits due to PSA’s technology that would allow it to meet all European Union CO2 goals. Since 2019, Chrysler Fiat & PSA (Citroen, Opel, Peugeot, and Vauxhall vehicles) have spent about $2.4 billion buying CO2 credits from Tesla. Tesla reported $2.365 billion in regulatory credits and posted earnings of $1.407 billion since 2019. So now, without Stellantis’ CO2 credits, Tesla’s future earnings are in doubt – unless it boosts its manufacturing efficiency.

The good news is that according to Electrek, Tesla’s second-quarter production capacity is already sold out according to “sources familiar with the matter.” The bad news is that the production of Tesla’s new plaid battery in its refreshed Model S and X models has been postponed again. Specifically, the delivery of the Model S plaid has been delayed another month, while the Model X plaid has been delayed by three months. Tesla enthusiasts are excited about the plaid models, since they are supposed to be very fast and have better cooling for sustainable performance as well as faster charging. It will be interesting to see if the plaid delays are due to glitches with the new 4680 lithium battery or just the ongoing chip shortage.

Navellier & Associates does own Tesla (TSLA), for one client, per client request in managed accounts.  We do not own VW Group (VWAGY), QuantumScape (QS), or Stellantis (STLA). Louis Navellier does not own Tesla (TSLA), QuantumScape (QS), VW Group (VWAGY), or Stellantis (STLA) personally.

All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

About The Author

Louis Navellier
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER

Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.