by Louis Navellier
April 26, 2022
While the U.S. press was more exercised over the words of Fed Chair Jerome Powell, perhaps the market was more shaken by the bizarre words and behavior of European Central Bank (ECB) President Christine Lagarde, who was on the same IMF panel with Powell and was a bit more colorful, since she refused to endorse a potential July interest rate hike by saying, “For goodness’ sake, let’s wait until we have the data and then move on to decide.” Lagarde also said the U.S. labor market is much stronger than Europe’s, and implied that the Fed could move more aggressively to fight inflation than the EU could. In the past, she has said she wanted to wait until the Ukrainian disruption was over, since it created a lot of uncertainty.
Overall, the euro will remain weak due to Lagarde’s reluctance to raise key interest rates, while the U.S. dollar remains strong, due to the Fed’s anticipated 50 basis point rate hikes at upcoming FOMC meetings. With long-term U.S. rates near 3% and short-term rates soon to rise to near 1%, the U.S. dollar will stay stronger than the euro, whose official rate remains near zero, so the world will keep buying U.S. dollars.
In addition, the U.S. economy is stronger than Europe’s, which is sinking into recession. This week, we get the official first estimate of first-quarter GDP. Last Tuesday, the Atlanta Fed revised its first-quarter GDP estimate up to a 1.3% annual rate, up from its previous estimate of a 1.1% annual pace. Thanks to a persistently strong consumer, the U.S. should be able to skirt a recession, as order backlogs will keep our manufacturing sector strong, with an even stronger service sector due to our amazingly upbeat consumer.
Specifically, the University of Michigan’s preliminary consumer sentiment index recently surged to 65.7 in April, bouncing off an 11-year low of 59.4 in March. The “expectations” component surged to 64.1 in April (up from 54.3 in March), while the “current conditions” component rose to 68.1 (from 67.2). Note: This could be a “spring surge,” since consumers are often “seasonally optimistic” when Spring arrives.
America is not only beating Europe in the currency and economic arenas, but we’re probably beating China, too, despite their rosy official statistics, just released. Specifically, China just announced that its GDP rose at a 4.8% annual pace in the first quarter, but many economists were either skeptical of this number, or doubted that this GDP growth could be sustained this quarter due to the Shanghai lockdown.
First, how can China’s GDP grow near 5% with factories closed down and home sales down 25.6% in the first quarter due to the Evergrande debt crisis? Also, how can Chinese officials expect 5.5% annual GDP growth in 2022 with their premier port and largest city, Shanghai, almost totally shut down? Unless there is a sudden miracle and double-digit growth in the second half, China could fall short of this lofty goal.
Currently, the nearly 30 million people trapped in Shanghai are not happy campers due to the oppressive Covid lockdown there, enforced by Chinese authorities. Shanghai is three times larger than New York City and its citizens have been forced to stay in their apartments and undergo virus testing. If citizens test positive, they are then forced into mass quarantine centers with 24/7 lighting and no showers. If a Shanghai citizen cannot have someone take care of their pets, those pets are killed by Covid authorities.
Shanghai accounts for a tremendous amount of China’s GDP and operates its biggest port. Massive U.S. companies doing business there, like Apple and Tesla, have been negotiating to restart their production, which stalled due to these oppressive Covid lockdowns. If Apple or Tesla are allowed to restart production, their workers must essentially sleep at the manufacturing plants as long as the lockdowns persist in Shanghai.
Due to the fact that China’s economic growth has stalled and much of Europe is in a recession, many economists now believe that inflation may have “peaked” in March. Obviously, any inflation relief will be welcome, but the peak in energy-based inflation may have to wait until September, when worldwide demand begins to fall as the weather cools and driving miles are reduced in the Northern Hemisphere.
Can the Fed end inflation while avoiding a “hard” (recessionary) landing? The jury is still out. The Wall Street Journal last week had a great article pointing out that in the past 80 years the Fed has never been able to lower inflation “as much as it is setting to do now … by 4% … without causing a recession.”
The difference this time is that the unemployment rate is very low, and consumers are still increasing their credit card debt, which is a sign of consumer confidence. According to Citigroup, first-quarter credit card spending rose 23%. JPMorgan reported a 29% rise, and Wells Fargo reported a 33% increase. JPMorgan also pointed out that charge-offs (bad credit card debt) have remained below 1.5% for three straight quarters, which caused Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan CEO, to say, “Charge-offs are extraordinarily good,” and added, “As a matter of fact, way better than they should be.” So if credit remains available to consumers, it is very possible that the Fed could engineer a soft landing and avoid a recession as key interest rates rise.
The U.S. Economic Indicators (Particularly in Housing) Remain Positive
The economic news last week was largely positive. For example, the Commerce Department announced that housing starts rose 0.3% in March to an annual pace of 1.793 million. Also notable was that building permits rose 0.4% in March to an annual pace of 1.873 million. February’s housing starts were also revised up to an annual pace of 1.788 million, up from 1.769 million first reported. The strength in housing starts was a surprise, since economists were expecting them to decelerate 2.4% to 1.745 million. So, despite the fact that mortgage rates are now up to 5%, the housing market remains surprisingly strong.
On Wednesday, the National Association of Realtors announced that existing home sales declined 2.7% in March to an annual pace of 5.77 million, but in the past 12 months, median home prices rose 15% to $375,300. The best news was that the inventory of existing homes for sale rose 11.8% to 950,000, so there is now a two-month supply of homes for sale at the current annual sales pace.
The Fed’s Beige Book survey was released on Wednesday and revealed some interesting details. First, the Fed remains worried about inflation since demand continues to outstrip the supply of everything from labor to goods. Second, the recent lockdowns in China, as well as the spike in energy and food costs due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, are exasperating inflationary pressures. Specifically, the Beige Book said, “Supply chain backlogs, labor market tightness, and elevated input costs continued to pose challenges on firms’ abilities to meet demand.” The Beige Book concluded by saying, “Outlooks for future growth were clouded by the uncertainty created by recent geopolitical developments and rising prices.”
Translated from Fedspeak, the Fed seems to be saying they are helpless in fighting inflation, but will continue to raise interest rates to try to prick the inflation bubble and engineer a soft economic landing.
And finally, the Labor Department on Thursday announced that weekly jobless claims declined to 184,000 in the latest week compared to a revised 186,000 the previous week, and continuing unemployment claims declined to 1.417 million in the latest week vs. 1.475 million in the previous week. This marks the ninth week in a row that weekly jobless claims have been below 200,000, so unemployment claims remain very positive for continued low unemployment in the upcoming months.
A Sound Energy Policy is a Major Key to Avoiding Hyper-inflation or Recession
If the Democrats don’t want to face a historic Congressional defeat in the November election, they better “get real” about their energy policies real fast. The lithium-ion battery shortage is now becoming increasingly obvious as companies struggle to cope with high lithium, nickel, and cobalt prices, which threaten to postpone the much-touted (but way too ambitious) electric vehicle (EV) revolution.
As a result of these added costs, Tesla has been raising prices for all its EVs, but the most interesting development is that its Model Y from the new Austin factory – with the latest and greatest 4680 batteries with 90% nickel – only has a 276-mile range. This is because Tesla has purposely shrunk the Austin-built Model Y’s battery pack, apparently so that it can sell more cars. Obviously, with Tesla now operating another new manufacturing plant in Berlin, Germany, the demand for the latest and greatest lithium-ion batteries (those with high nickel content) may continue to outstrip supply, which is why Bloomberg has said that the EV battery shortage is becoming even more acute than the semiconductor shortage.
Last Tuesday, The Wall Street Journal cited Rivian CEO R.J. Scaringe’s warning that the shortage of battery supplies for EVs could surpass the semiconductor shortage. Specifically, Scaringe said, “All the world’s (battery) cell production combined represents well under 10% of what we will need in 10 years,” adding that, “90-95% of the supply chain does not exist.” His alarm was echoed by Tesla’s Elon Musk.
According to Benchmark, raw materials now account for 80% of the cost of a lithium-ion battery, up from 40% in 2015. Specifically, Benchmark said that materials for the battery cathode, such as lithium, cobalt, and nickel, have collectively risen about 150% in the past year, including 25% to 30% in the past month! This is why Rivian recently had to raise the price on its pickup by $17,000, and $20,000 more on its SUV.
One reason why Tesla posted record first-quarter profits last Wednesday is that the company’s regulatory tax credits more than doubled to $679 million (vs. the previous quarter). On the Tesla conference call last Wednesday, CEO Elon Musk said that higher lithium prices are “a limiting factor” to EV growth. In the first quarter, the average Tesla cost $52,200, which was 2.9% higher than the fourth quarter.
In their earnings statement, Tesla said, “Our own factories have been running below capacity for several quarters as supply chain became the main limiting factor, which is likely to continue through the rest of 2022.” CEO Musk also added on the Tesla conference call that although severe supply chain pressures are curtailing Tesla’s output, Tesla’s new manufacturing plants in Austin (Texas) and Berlin (Germany) should enable the company to overcome some bottlenecks and make “over 1.5 million cars this year.”
The fact that Russia is a major nickel supplier is just one of the many catalysts behind soaring prices for lithium-ion battery components. Another factor was rising demand for EVs, especially in China and Europe. Between Russia’s commodity ban by Western nations, and more supply chain disruptions from the Shanghai Covid shutdown, now we have Russia escalating the conflict with the U.S. via a diplomatic pouch sent to Washington DC apparently demanding that the U.S. stop supplying Ukraine with weapons!
Although the Ukraine war is now concentrated in the East and along the Caspian Sea, Russia continues to launch cruise missiles at Lviv and Kyiv to terrorize Ukrainian citizens. Also, Russia flew two TU-160 nuclear bombers over Ukraine, escorted by fighter jets, to further terrorize citizens. Clearly, the Russian invasion of Ukraine is not over, and it now threatens to draw in NATO countries, so uncertainty persists.
I should add that the probability of a Russian debt default is rising, which could trigger the U.S. seizing more Russian assets, including possibly the assets of the Russian central bank, where $642 billion in foreign currencies are currently frozen. The U.S. did seize $3.5 billion in assets from Afghanistan’s central bank, so central banks have been used as a major weapon, in addition to economic sanctions.
However, if the U.S. and its allies try to seize the assets of the Russian central bank, it will be interesting to see if Russia starts flying its TU-160 nuclear bombers over Europe. The Russian state media is already saying that World War III has begun, but many in Russia remain skeptical of these Doomsday warnings.
Navellier & Associates owns Apple Computer (AAPL), and a few accounts own Tesla (TSLA), per client request in managed accounts. We do not own China Evergrande Group (EGRNF), Citigroup (C), JPMorgan (JPM), Rivian Automotive (RIVN), and Wells Fargo (WFC). Louis Navellier and his family own Apple Computer (AAPL), via a Navellier managed account and Apple Computer (AAPL), in a personal account. He does not China Evergrande Group (EGRNF), Citigroup (C), JPMorgan (JPM), Rivian Automotive (RIVN), or Wells Fargo (WFC) personally.
All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Also In This Issue
A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
Why the U.S. Is Still the #1 Global Oasis for Investors
Income Mail by Bryan Perry
Look To Buy These Six Sectors Pulling Back from Record Highs
Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
The Washington Commanders’ Days are Numbered (at 196)
Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
Euro/Dollar Parity is In the Cards
Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
Did Powell Put a Real (or Fake) Tarantula on the Market’s Face?
View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.
Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.
None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.
Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.
One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.
ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:
- ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
- An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
- The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
- The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
- Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.
Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.
This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing email@example.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.
FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.
IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades. Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.
Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.
Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.
FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.