April 23, 2019

It used to be said that a strong dollar meant weaker oil prices and vice versa, but a lot has changed in that relationship in the last year. As the dollar kept rallying, the oil market stayed firm as the whiff of new Iran oil sanctions kept oil prices stronger than they otherwise might have been. Then, Iran oil sanctions turned out to be not as severe as feared and the hoarding of oil leading up to the sanctions, combined with a sharp downturn in the Chinese economy took the price of crude from $77 to $42 in a single quarter!

To be fair, it’s not just the strong dollar itself that made oil historically weak, but what caused the dollar to be strong. The dollar would normally be strong in Federal Reserve tightening cycles, which tended to slow the global economy and cause the dollar to trade higher on interest rate differentials. There are multiple other factors, in addition to this well-established feedback loop affecting oil prices.

Recovering to around $64 at present, one would think that all is well in the crude oil market, but we again face a very firm dollar, courtesy of Fed balance sheet runoff activities (aka QT) and the ECB’s belated QE activities, as well as aggressive Chinese fiscal and monetary stimulus that affects the demand side of crude oil markets. After all, China is the biggest importer of crude oil on global markets and a pickup in economic activity in China impacts prices, particularly in the seasonally-strong March-September period.

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary

The Chinese sharp slowdown and rebound, Iran oil sanctions, and a rather messy global economy have caused the correlation between the dollar and crude oil to break down rather dramatically in the past year. This also causes problematic correlations between oil and various commodity indexes, where energy is often the heaviest-weighted component.

But what about industrial metals, which are less political. but equally economically-sensitive?

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

Industrial metals have also perked up with the rebound in energy prices, but they are not as “perky” as crude oil. Could it be that the Chinese economy has experienced an economic rebound, while the rest of the world has not done as well, resulting in weaker industrial metals and stronger crude oil?

Turning around an economy the size of China is like turning around an aircraft carrier. China managed to arrest their economic deceleration yet again, with their infamous lending quotas. Frankly, I have no idea how long this “forced lending” business can maintain an expansionary economic cycle that is now 26 years long. I only know that they cannot extend it into perpetuity, which raises interesting questions as to the severity of the downturn when it arrives, as so many problems and unproductive uses of capital have been swept under the proverbial Beijing carpet.

More Divergences in the Energy Space

One correlation that has been holding up well is the one between the MSCI Emerging Markets Index and crude oil. It has been surreal how long it has lasted and keeps on holding. A large part of the MSCI index is economies that benefit from high crude oil prices, while the other part is economies that use a lot of crude oil. When demand for crude oil is high, both consumers and producers do well.

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

Emerging markets have rebounded dramatically with the rebound in crude oil prices, but I think the situation has been disproportionately impacted by China, which has an estimated GDP of $14.2 trillion for 2018 and as such is bigger than the next 10 emerging economies combined, so if China is not doing well the rest of the emerging markets universe is not doing well, either, save only for India. This is because India is a somewhat closed economy driven by its own internal dynamics and tends to benefit tremendously from lower oil prices (when China is not doing well). You could say that when it comes to economic performance, in a large way what is bad for China to a considerable degree is good for India.

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

When it comes to crude oil, there is something that doesn’t quite fit the picture. The PHLX Oil Service Index took out its low from 2008 and the oil price didn’t. On the other hand, the oil price did take out its low from 2008 in early 2016 but the OSX index didn’t. The point is that this index houses oil service companies that are very sensitive to oil prices and drilling budgets. An oil price at $64 does not imply an OSX level of $99 but more likely north of $150. Either the OSX index will rally or the stocks in the index are sensing a weakness in the crude oil prices that is not reflected by the price of crude oil … yet.

I think the rebound in crude oil prices in 2019 is primarily driven by China. I think this strong crude oil price is very misleading, as a rebound in the Chinese economy is driven by their infamous lending quotas. That does not mean that the rest of the world is doing all that well, save for the United States.

About The Author

Ivan Martchev
INVESTMENT STRATEGIST

Ivan Martchev is an investment strategist with Navellier.  Previously, Ivan served as editorial director at InvestorPlace Media. Ivan was editor of Louis Rukeyser’s Mutual Funds and associate editor of Personal Finance. Ivan is also co-author of The Silk Road to Riches (Financial Times Press). The book provided analysis of geopolitical issues and investment strategy in natural resources and emerging markets with an emphasis on Asia. The book also correctly predicted the collapse in the U.S. real estate market, the rise of precious metals, and the resulting increased investor interest in emerging markets. Ivan’s commentaries have been published by MSNBC, The Motley Fool, MarketWatch, and others. *All content of “Global Mail” represents the opinion of Ivan Martchev*

Disclosures

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for you. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Results presented include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings.

Past performance is no indication of future results.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not intended or written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE: The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Request here a list of recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. for the preceding twelve months, please contact Tim Hope at (775) 785-9416.

Marketmail Archives