by Louis Navellier
March 28, 2023
At his press conference after the FOMC statement on Wednesday, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell came off as dovish, which the financial markets liked. Investors responded positively, at first. However, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen (who is technically Jerome Powell’s boss) was testifying in front of Congress on Wednesday during Powell’s press conference and said, “I have not considered or discussed anything having to do with blanket insurance or guarantees of deposits,” a statement that seemed to imply that not all bank accounts would be covered by government backing, and that sent the market back down again.
Previously, at a Tuesday American Bankers Association conference, Treasury Secretary Yellen had said, “Let me be clear: the government’s recent actions have demonstrated our resolute commitment to take the necessary steps to ensure that depositors’ savings and the banking system remain safe.” The next day, Yellen’s doublespeak to Congress spooked financial markets, creating unnecessary investor uncertainty.
Then, Treasury Secretary Yellen made matters worse on Thursday, when she tried to correct her previous comments in front of Congress, saying, “Certainly, we would be prepared to take additional actions if warranted,” which some interpreted to mean that the bailout of all depositors was not yet certain, or even warranted. Yellen’s comments reignited recent banking fears and caused the stock market to sell off, so she was 2-for-2 in spooking the stock market last week. As a result, I propose that Treasury Secretary Yellen stick to her prepared script, since some of her unscripted comments keep getting her in trouble!
Overall, her gaffes didn’t kill the market, as the Dow rose 1.18% last week, the S&P 500 rose 1.39%, and NASDAQ rose 1.66%. For the year so far, the Dow is down 2.7%, the S&P is up 3.4%, and NASDAQ has soared +13%, as tech and growth stocks in general have enjoyed a revival. Still, the global banking crisis is creating new stresses in the banking system and is anticipated to cause economic growth to slow.
Forecasting global GDP is difficult, but my bullish outlook on crude oil is based on the fact that demand usually rises in the spring, so by the time the Fourth of July and Labor Day arrive, there should be much more crude oil demand, which is why crude oil prices are historically higher in the summer months.
One factor putting pressure on crude oil prices is that Russian seaborne crude oil shipments this month have only fallen by 90,000 barrels a day to 3.23 million barrels a day through March 17th. The March cut of 500,000 barrels that Russia announced has yet to materialize, but a slowdown in Russia’s Siberian oil fields takes time to show up in the Baltic Sea and Black Sea. Russia’s crude oil exports to Europe have collapsed, with just Bulgaria on the Black Sea still receiving a reduced amount of Russian crude oil.
China and Russia Form a More Open Alliance
Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived in Moscow last week. President Xi said that “political mutual trust is deepening” between Moscow and Beijing. However, President Xi did not seem to convince Vladimir Putin to agree to a cease fire with Ukraine. After China issued a 12-point position paper calling for talks toward ending the conflict with Ukraine, President Xi said, “We are always for peace and dialogue. We stand firmly on the right side of history.” Interestingly, President Xi is expected to call Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky after his Moscow trip, so it will be interesting if a cease fire can ensue.
The primary reason why China wants a cease fire in Ukraine is that the G7 has started sanctioning Chinese companies that do business with Russia. Now that the G7 has accused Russia and Vladimir Putin of war crimes, and the International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin, the West is not expected to have any grounds for negotiating with Russia on any cease fire agreement.
It is obvious that China is relishing its new role as international peace arbiter, since the U.S. refuses to negotiate without full NATO representation present. In the event that China eventually gets Russia to agree to a cease fire, the stock market could stage a big relief rally. However, the sanctions on Russia will likely remain in place until the West successfully negotiates some package of Russian war reparations.
One outcome of President Xi and Vladimir Putin’s meeting is that China and Russia are deepening their cooperation on key atomic technology. Specifically, Xi and Putin announced a long-term deal to continue developing fast neutron reactors. Last December, Russia transferred (via its nuclear giant Rosatom) 25 tons of highly enriched uranium to China’s first fast reactor, the CFR-600, a facility that could produce fuel for 50 nuclear warheads per year. Naturally, this has the Pentagon and Congress very nervous, as Russia is the world’s largest supplier of nuclear fuel and its nuclear exports have surged in the past year.
The war in Ukraine disrupted worldwide food production last year, but thanks to a 55% increase in Canadian wheat production, Canada can help prevent mass starvation in the third world. However, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has been gearing up to tell Canadian farmers to switch from chemical to organic fertilizers to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, which would dramatically reduce Canada’s wheat output.
Essentially, Trudeau is following Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s agriculture reforms, but there was a political earthquake recently in the Netherlands when the Dutch Pro-Farmer Party swept the provincial elections to become the biggest party in the Senate. Amazingly, the Pro-Farmer Party did not exist four years ago, but PM Rutte’s agriculture reforms, which included seizing up to 30% of farmland to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, caused outrage with Dutch farmers, who are the most productive per acre in the world. As a result, Rutte’s goal of cutting carbon dioxide emissions by 50% by 2030 is now in jeopardy.
Obviously, the European Union and Canada’s goals of reducing carbon dioxide emissions can have severe consequences for themselves and the world. Although Canada is blessed by tremendous hydroelectric output and can more easily reduce its carbon dioxide emissions, as soon as Justin Trudeau tries to tell farmers how to fertilize their fields, the potential blowback could be much more severe than the recent Canadian trucker’s strike. Trudeau seized truckers’ bank accounts (and some guns) throughout Canada, but messing with Canadian farmer families in the vast prairie provinces is destined to fail.
As a result, I suspect that chemical fertilizer companies will fare much better than expected during this coming growing season, despite the fact that green police in Europe and Canada are trying to force farmers to switch to less productive organic fertilizers.
Here in the U.S., Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) investment polices remain under scrutiny, since Congress passed the Congressional Review Act to overturn a Labor Department rule protecting pension funds that invest based on ESG criteria. This rule protects retirement-fund managers from fiduciary duty lawsuits if their investment choices cause lower returns or losses because the funds indulge in too many climate-change or social-justice causes. Under traditional fiduciary standards, funds are obliged to maximize client returns. However, President Biden vetoed the Congressional Review Act, so my thoughts are, ESG investments can continue to fleece investors, since they no longer have a fiduciary duty! Obviously, this legislation – to exempt ESG investments from fiduciary duties – is changing the rules of investing.
Home Prices are Declining, but Housing Costs Keep Rising?
The housing component of the Consumer Price Index (owners’ equivalent rent) keeps rising at near double-digit annual rates, but the National Association of Home Builders on Tuesday announced that existing home prices declined on a full 12-month basis for the first time in 11 years (since February 2012). Since June, when median home prices peaked at a record $413,800, median home prices have declined 12.3%, and median home prices declined another 0.2% in February to $363,000.
The good news is that the volume of existing home sales rose 14.5% in February to an annual pace of 4.58 million. Mortgage rates have fallen in the last five weeks and are now at 6.48% according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. Spring is a seasonally strong time for home sales, so if mortgage rates continue to decline, sales may continue to pick up, especially if home prices keep falling.
The Commerce Department reported on Thursday that new home sales rose 1.1% in February to a 640,000 annual pace – the sixth straight month that new homes sales rose. The backlog of new homes being built rose to the highest level in 11 months (since March 2022). The number of new homes for sale at the end of February was 436,000, an 8.2-month supply at the current sales pace. Due to this strong inventory backlog of new homes, median prices will likely decline in the upcoming months.
Prices are coming down. We just need the Fed to realize this and pause their rate-raising cycle a while and turn their attention to flattening the yield curve to help rescue banks in the red with their bond holdings.
In other economic news, the Commerce Department announced on Friday that durable goods orders declined 1% in February due in large part to a 2.8% decline in transportation orders for autos and commercial airplanes. Excluding transportation, durable goods orders were unchanged. Overall, durable goods have been dragged down by a weak transportation sector, which has declined in three of the past four months. There is no doubt that higher interest rates are now impeding vehicle sales, so hopefully – as with housing sales – lower interest rates will help stimulate vehicle sales in the upcoming months.
All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Also In This Issue
A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
Janet Yellen Undermines Powell’s Positive Message
Income Mail by Bryan Perry
The FASB, Treasury, and Federal Reserve Caused this Banking Crisis
Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
“Let Them Eat Quantitative Tightening”
Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
“Jean-Claude” Powell and Janet “Trichet” Spook the Markets
Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
Sensing Market Earthquakes or Tsunamis in Advance
View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.
Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.
None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.
Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.
One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.
ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:
- ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
- An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
- The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
- The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
- Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.
Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.
This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing email@example.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.
FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.
IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades. Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.
Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.
Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.
FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.