March 19, 2019

I had one of the strangest conversations with an investor this month regarding the Federal Reserve. He tried to convince me that the Fed does not know what it is doing by paying interest on excess reserves. When they pay interest on excess reserves, he said, they cause banks to hoard cash and not lend, which is why there are so many excess reverses in the system. “The Fed discourages lending with such policies.”

The silence between his statement and my answer may have seemed uncomfortably long. Here is why:

Excess reserves at depository institutions are a function of quantitative easing (QE). They were created on purpose by the Fed, and they are most definitely not a function of the Fed paying excess reserve interest rates. As the Fed bought bonds from primary dealers, they credited their accounts at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY) with electronic cash (excess reserves).

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary

FRBNY is a bank for commercial banks and all other open-market operations. FRBNY is to a bank what an average person’s neighborhood bank is to that person’s checking account. When the Fed rolled out QE, it bought the bonds and credited the primary dealer’s accounts at FRBNY with electronic credits, so when the inflationists say that “the Fed is printing money,” there is no actual ink used. It’s all electronic.

The reason why the Fed created those excess reserves was to stimulate lending, not to prevent it from happening. If they had not done that, the Great Recession of 2008 might have become the Second Great Depression, because the real estate bubble-related losses in the banking system were gargantuan. Such losses resulted from the oxymoronic AAA-rated subprime CDOs and other absurdities that made hedge fund managers like John Paulson of Paulson and Co. very rich by shorting these instruments.

With their QE monetarist maneuvers, the Fed succeeded in creating a very long economic recovery and record profits for the S&P 500 Index, which in turn pushed the S&P 500 Index to an all-time high in 2018. In July 2019, the present economic expansion will become the longest in U.S. history. Since I don’t believe there will be a recession in 2019 and maybe not in 2020– with fingers crossed for the Chinese trade deal and President Trump surviving the Mueller mess – we very well may see a fresh all-time high for the S&P 500 Index in 2019, too.

At the root of this massive bull market in U.S. stocks are those very excess reserves which were created with the help of Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and his Ph.D. in monetary economics from MIT.

In addition to helping credit growth in the U.S. banking system recover from the monstrous real-estate bubble losses, QE is the largest carry trade in the world. The Fed buys bonds with electronic credits (excess reserves) and pockets the interest rate differential between the yields on the bonds they buy and the interest on excess reserves they pay the banks. The interest rate differential between the excess reserve rate and the yield on the Fed bond portfolio is remitted to the U.S. Treasury Department. One could characterize that enormous Fed-designed carry trade as a very profitable side effect of quantitative easing.

How the Fed Increases Liquidity Without Fueling Inflation

When large amounts of excess reserves are created, with the primary task being to stimulate lending in a financial system that is tending toward deflation, the Fed had to solve another big problem, and that is, how to prevent hyperinflation.

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

Without interest on excess reserves, the credit multiplier effect that is embedded in the fractional reserve banking system would have produced hyperinflation when those excess reserves enter the fed funds market. (The fed funds market is a place where banks can lend their excess reserves to each other with the supervision of fed funds traders employed by FRBNY that keep the interest rates on those loans within the band specified by the FOMC, presently at 2.25-2.50%.) The variability of the effective fed funds rate is obvious in the chart above as those transactions are being made throughout the day.

When the interest on excess reserves is higher than the fed funds rate, as has been the case for most of the last 10 years, the activity on the fed funds market grinds down. You could say that Ben Bernanke may have caused some of his own fed funds traders to look for other careers, as he was trying to prevent spiraling unemployment caused by the Great Recession. This, as they say, is where the plot thickens.

As the excess reserve interest rate is converging with the fed funds rate and excess reserves themselves are dropping due to the ongoing policy of quantitative tightening done by the Federal Reserve (evident in the Fed’s shrinking balance sheet), it appears to me that the Federal Reserve is trying to resuscitate the credit multiplier effect in the U.S. financial system and return the system back to more normal ways of operation. It’s too early to declare victory yet, but it would appear the Fed is hell-bent on succeeding.

If they succeed, it would appear that job advertisements will be more plentiful for fed funds traders in New York City and that Ben Bernanke will be at the top of the list for the Nobel Prize in Economics.

And the bottom line in the whole process is that the Fed is most certainly not stupid.

About The Author

Ivan Martchev
INVESTMENT STRATEGIST

Ivan Martchev is an investment strategist with Navellier.  Previously, Ivan served as editorial director at InvestorPlace Media. Ivan was editor of Louis Rukeyser’s Mutual Funds and associate editor of Personal Finance. Ivan is also co-author of The Silk Road to Riches (Financial Times Press). The book provided analysis of geopolitical issues and investment strategy in natural resources and emerging markets with an emphasis on Asia. The book also correctly predicted the collapse in the U.S. real estate market, the rise of precious metals, and the resulting increased investor interest in emerging markets. Ivan’s commentaries have been published by MSNBC, The Motley Fool, MarketWatch, and others. *All content of “Global Mail” represents the opinion of Ivan Martchev*

Disclosures

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for you. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Results presented include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings.

Past performance is no indication of future results.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not intended or written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE: The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Request here a list of recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. for the preceding twelve months, please contact Tim Hope at (775) 785-9416.

Marketmail Archives