by Louis Navellier

February 8, 2022

Across the pond, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson is under investigation by Scotland Yard for holding a party at his apartment during the height of Britain’s Covid lockdown restrictions. It appears that he hosted a “BYOB” (bring your own bottle) party at his office during the latest Covid lockdown.

In Canada, truckers via their “Freedom Convoy” descended on Ottawa, the nation’s capital, to protest the Covid restrictions, but Prime Minister Trudeau was whisked off to a secret location to hide from the crowd, which he referred to as “fringe.” Trudeau excused himself by saying that he tested positive for Covid, so he conveniently had to quarantine for at least five days rather than address the protestors.

Finally, California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti are under criticism for hanging out with basketball legend Magic Johnson and violating the mask mandate at the 49ers vs. Rams NFL playoff game, at a time when toddlers and kindergartners at California schools must wear masks.

Boris Johnson has apologized, and Gavin Newsome has tried to explain his gaffe, but it will be interesting if Justin Trudeau is actually capable of apologizing after making any Canadian returning to Canada on an airplane be incarcerated in hotels for three days during the height of the Covid restrictions!  Canada’s outrage against the Covid restrictions is a sign that economic freedom is valued by workers around the world. I find the call for economic freedom a positive sign, plus a call for shared sacrifice by our leaders.

In addition, strict mandates have put the robust economic growth rates of late 2021 in danger of a rapid reversal into recession. Last Wednesday the Atlanta Fed estimated first-quarter GDP growth at just a 0.1% annual pace. Coming off the 6.9% annual growth rate in the fourth quarter, this is a shocking slowing of growth to a near-standstill. I realize that we’ve seen severe snowstorms, which curtails GDP activity briefly until the snow melts, but if the Atlanta Fed’s forecast is accurate, the Fed will be reluctant to raise key interest rates too soon, since the U.S. may be teetering on slipping into a recession at election time.

I also warned in my recent podcasts that investors should brace themselves for the January inflation statistics due to surging natural gas and crude oil prices. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Producer Price Index (PPI) announcements this Thursday and next Tuesday are expected to be truly shocking. It will be interesting if these inflation statistics reignite fears that the Fed will hike short-term interest rates by 0.5% instead of 0.25%, which is anticipated in March. As I have repeatedly said, the Fed never fights market rates, so watching long-term rates is more important than endless speculation about rate hikes.

Speaking of inflation, on Wednesday, Eurostat announced that consumer inflation rose to a record 5.1% annual pace in Europe in January, due to surging energy prices. Specifically, energy prices have risen 28.6% in the past year, while food prices rose 5.2%. Excluding food and energy, the core rate of inflation is at 2.3% (per year), which is down from a 2.6% annual pace in December. Since Ukraine is called “the breadbasket of Europe,” the build-up of Russian troops on the border is starting to influence food prices.

The European Central Bank (ECB) on Thursday said that they were “unanimously concerned” about inflation, but ECB President Christine Lagarde said that the Governing Council expects inflation to fall back to its 2% target. The ECB is continuing its asset purchases (quantitative easing) but signaled that they will decrease QE gradually. Not surprisingly, the ECB did not raise rates, which remain at 0%.

By contrast, the Bank of England raised its key short-term interest rate by 0.25% Thursday to 0.5%, which represents its second straight interest rate increase. The primary reason the Bank of England increased key short-term interest rates is that it raised its inflation forecast to 7.25%, up from 6% in December. Due to higher energy prices, Britain is very vulnerable and can do little to fight inflation, other than to increase the value of the British pound, so the price of imported goods might decrease slightly.

The Latest Economic Statistics are Generally Trending Down

In addition to the Atlanta Fed’s shocking estimate of only 0.1% GDP growth this quarter, many U.S. statistics are turning down, in part due to rising inflation and some recent lockdowns due to COVID.

The Institute of Supply Management (ISM) announced on Tuesday that its manufacturing index slipped to 57.6 in January, down from 58.8 in December. Since any reading above 50 signals an expansion, the report still reflects a healthy expansion. In addition, 14 of the 15 industries surveyed in January reported that they were expanding. (The only industry to report a contraction in January was Paper Products, so perhaps the silver lining is that people know better than to hoard too much Toilet Paper this time around!)

On Thursday, ISM announced that its non-manufacturing (service) index slipped to 59.9 in January, down from 62.3 in December. This is still a very impressive number, since 50+ means expansion, and all 15 service industries surveyed by ISM reported an expansion, so the service sector remains very healthy.

The Commerce Department reported on Thursday that durable goods orders declined 0.9% in December, but November’s durable goods were revised up to a 3.2% increase. The primary reason for the big swing down in durable goods in December is that the transportation sector contracted 3.9% in December after surging 8.2% in November. The culprit for the volatile transportation order swings is in the commercial aircraft sector, where December orders plunged 14.4% after soaring 41.9% in November. Excluding the volatile transportation component, durable goods orders rose 0.4% in December and 1.1% in November. Overall, it is reassuring that, excluding transportation, durable goods orders continue to steadily improve.

Why the Wild Conflict in Job Numbers?
(And Why Believe Any of those Numbers?)

Workers are still quitting in droves, mostly in search of better-paying jobs in a world of rising prices. The Labor Department reported that 4.3 million workers, representing 2.9% of the workforce, quit their jobs in December. In the previous two months, October and November, 4.2 million and 4.5 million workers, respectively, also quit their jobs, bringing the total to 13 million quits in the quarter. Naturally, this high quit rate is complicating payroll statistics, since the workforce briefly shrinks until these workers find new jobs. There are now a whopping 10.9 million job openings in the U.S., so an acute labor shortage persists.

Here’s what happens when job security and longevity are no longer predictable: The statistics of new hires wildly conflict. The biggest conflict I’ve ever seen happened last week when ADP reported that private payrolls declined by 301,000 in January, which was galaxies below economists’ consensus estimate of a 200,000 gain. This is the first time that ADP reported negative private payroll change since December 2020. According to ADP, the leisure and hospitality sector was hit hardest and lost 154,000 jobs, due to layoffs attributed to fears of the Omicron variant. The trade, transportation and utilities sector also lost 62,000 jobs in January. Naturally, if the workforce continues to shrink, the Fed will be in a bit of a pickle.

Then, shockingly, the Labor Department on Friday reported that 467,000 payroll jobs were created in January, substantially above economists’ consensus estimate of 150,000. Furthermore, the November and December payrolls were also revised up massively, to 647,000 (from 249,000 previously reported) and to 510,000 (from 199,000 previously reported)! It makes you wonder why they bother with the initial report!

The unemployment rate rose to 4% in January, up from 3.9% in December, as the labor force expanded. The labor force participation rate in January rose to 62.2%, up from 61.9% in December, and is now at the highest level since the start of the pandemic. Interestingly, the average work week declined to 34.5 hours in January, down from 34.7 in December. Average hourly earnings rose 0.7% (23 cents) to $31.63 per hour in January, up 5.9% in the past 12 months. Overall, the Labor Department’s job revisions were shockingly high, and some seasonal adjustments may have artificially inflated the January payroll report.

Between these two jobs reports, the Labor Department also announced on Thursday that new weekly unemployment claims came in at 238,000, down from a revised 261,000 in the previous week. Continuing unemployment claims came in at 1.628 million, below the revised 1.672 million in the previous week. Overall, weekly and continuing claims were better than economists’ consensus expectations.

Finally, crude oil prices surged above $90 per barrel last week for the first time since 2014. It is important to note that crude oil prices typically rise every spring, since demand naturally rises, because there are more people who drive and work in the Northern Hemisphere than the Southern Hemisphere. Obviously, geo-political tensions are also putting some upward pressure on crude oil prices. Russia has tried to “sanction proof” its economy since it seized the Crimean Peninsula in 2014 and is actually being economically rewarded now for assembling troops on the Ukrainian border. I hate to say it, but $100 per barrel crude oil could be coming soon, due to soaring seasonal demand and especially if we see war erupt in Ukraine.

Despite all this energy inflation and global unrest, the good news is that earnings are mostly working, and many stocks have resurged on short covering. Last week, better-than-expected fourth-quarter earnings from UPS, plus a 48% dividend increase, were especially well received by Wall Street. I was also happy about Google’s blowout fourth-quarter sales and earnings. Google’s sales were nearly 6% above analysts’ consensus estimate, while its earnings were 12.85% better than analysts’ consensus estimate. Google also announced a 20-for-1 stock split. Google’s leadership should help the other technology stocks rebound.

Navellier & Associates owns Alphabet (GOOG) and United Parcel Service Inc. (UPS), in managed accounts Louis Navellier and his family own Alphabet (GOOG), via a Navellier managed account, but do not own United Parcel Service Inc. (UPS), personally.

All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

Also In This Issue

About The Author

Louis Navellier

Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at or by requesting a copy by emailing All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.