by Louis Navellier
February 7, 2023
A day after the Fed’s announcement, the European Central Bank (ECB) raised its key interest rate 0.5% to 2.5% on Thursday. This was the fifth straight increase in the ECB’s key interest rate, which is now at its highest level since 2008. The ECB said that it would “stay the course in raising interest rates significantly,” so another 0.5% rate increase is anticipated in March. Interestingly, the ECB said that after its March meeting that it “will then evaluate the subsequent path of its monetary policy.” Translated from central bank double-talk, the ECB is expected to pause its key interest rate increases after March.
The best news is that the recent Treasury auctions have been going amazingly well due to the fact the bid-to-cover ratio has averaged only 0.12%. In fact, January experienced the strongest bidding for Treasury securities since October 2021. Frankly, this means that bond investors are fully expecting inflation to cool off, and that the Fed’s key interest rate hikes will soon end. After the FOMC meeting, the 10-year Treasury bond yield declined to below 3.6%, which is the lowest yield since September 2022.
One of the reasons why there is likely a lot of buying pressure at recent Treasury auctions is that investors suddenly have some good money market investments available, plus certificates of deposit (CDs) have become popular again. Obviously, investors are not worried about inflation, since they have been pushing Treasury yields lower. The Fed’s favorite inflation indicator, the Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) index, cooled to a 5% annual pace in December. The core PCE, excluding food and energy, also slowed to a 4.4% annual pace. In December, the PCE index for goods declined 0.7%, while the price of services rose 0.5%. The Fed has been trying to squelch service inflation and seems to be succeeding.
The most certain economic event in the upcoming months, to me, is that crude oil prices will be rising due to growing global demand and the fact that the Biden Administration will no longer be releasing up to one million barrels per day from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to manipulate crude oil prices.
Ongoing Challenges Facing EVs, Autonomous Driving Systems, and ESG Investing
Although U.S. crude oil inventories remain high near-term, as seasonal demand picks up, crude oil prices are expected to rise to $100 per barrel in the spring and peak at $120 in the summer. It will be interesting to see what happens to EV sales now that Tesla and other EV manufacturers have an inventory glut.
Ford Motor announced on Monday that it is lowering the price if its Mach-e by $600, depending on the model. Although the Mach-e has not been profitable for Ford due to its higher battery component costs, Mach-e production is expected to increase from 78,000 annual units to 130,000 this year. Marin Gjaja, the head of Ford’s EV business said, “We are responding to changes in the marketplace” and added, “As we want to stay competitive in the marketplace, we’re having to respond.” Ford Motor is currently #2 in U.S. EV sales, so clearly it intends to continue to capture a significant share of EV sales.
The other significant news in the automotive industry is that Mercedes has become the first car company approved for Level 3 autonomy. This is also a big win for Nvidia, which is making the AI chips that Mercedes is using in its autonomous driving systems. Only the Mercedes S-Class and its EQS EV has its Level 3 Drive Pilot Automated Driver Assist System (ADAS) that allows autonomous driving “on suitable freeway sections and where there is a high traffic density.”
I for one think Tesla made a big mistake when it eliminated expensive LiDAR sensors, which the U.S. military uses to guide its missiles through smoke, fog, snow, and other difficult to see environments. Currently, Tesla’s “Full Self Driving” system relies on just cameras and GPS data. Tesla’s Full Self Driving, Ford’s Blue Cruise, and GM’s Super Cruise are all Level 2 autonomous systems. Level 5 is the ultimate goal for the auto industry, which is a vehicle that will drive us around with no steering wheel.
One of the big developments helping the fossil fuel industry is that big states like Florida and Texas have seen a big ESG backlash. Interestingly, on February 1st, the Biden Administration’s Department of Labor (DOL) officially removed any fiduciary liability from ESG risk factors by removing “pecuniary factors” from the DOL rule amending “Investment Duties” under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974. In other words, if you lose all your money in ESG investments – like British battery startup, Britishvolt did, recently filing for bankruptcy – then you are effectively without legal recourse.
Effectively, our elected leaders are still pushing ESG investing, but also are trying to remove any culpability for ESG investments that are destined for bankruptcy. Although the U.S. is in the midst of building many new battery plants to qualify for the tax incentives under the Inflation Protection Act, the transition to electric vehicles is complicated, since there may not be enough lithium to make the EV transition many politicians desire. Last week, I mentioned The Guardian’s many scathing articles about lithium mining. According to The Guardian, the global demand for lithium may rise 40-fold by 2040.
There is currently only one lithium mine in the U.S. It is operated by Albemarle at its Nevada Silver Peak facility, which is a sprawling 21-square mile facility that has 22 enormous evaporating ponds that hold a briny liquid from underground wells that bakes the salty fluid in those evaporating ponds. It takes about two years to bake the salt under the Nevada sun before the pond brine is heavy enough for processing, where lime and soda ash are added to extract lithium carbonate. The Silver Peak facility makes 5,000 tons of lithium carbonate annually, which is enough to make batteries for 80,000 EVs. The worldwide demand for lithium is currently about 350,000 tons and forecasted to rise to 2.1 million tons by 2030.
There is another, potentially bigger, lithium mine in Nevada seeking aid from the Biden Administration after a conditional $700 million loan was granted to begin mining. The Energy Department said the Rhyolite Ridge site could produce enough lithium to support the production of 370,000 EVs, but there is an endangered Nevada wildflower, called Tiehm’s buckwheat, that is delaying the Rhyolite Ridge mine. The environmental impact report on Rhyolite Ridge will obviously try to save this endangered Nevada wildflower, plus recharge the water table from the tremendous extraction of underground water.
Obviously, mining is a very big, complicated business, whether for oil, lithium, or gold. Complicating matters further are migrating birds that sometimes land in evaporating ponds. There is a lot of gold mining in Nevada that is required to cover the evaporating ponds that contain cyanide that is used to extract gold. When you fly over Nevada, you may not be aware of many marshes that support ducks, geese, and other migrating birds. As someone who has a home in Nevada, I am keenly aware of these beautiful marshes, but since only 743 people live in Esmerelda County, Nevada, I suspect that the Biden Administration will succeed in pushing through expanded lithium mining, despite the potential environmental devastation to the water table, marshes, and migrating birds.
As I have been saying, Tesla got kicked out of S&P’s Global ESG index back in May due to concerns about the lithium battery production at its Reno plant, which is actually operated by Panasonic. When Tesla was kicked out of S&P’s Global ESG index, it was replaced by Exxon Mobil. U.S. refiners are now making “green diesel” from animal and organic waste, which is also why the U.S. has had acute diesel shortages, since the green diesel production lowered the U.S. diesel production by approximately 400,000 barrels per day.
Are you confused enough about what ESG means now? We all are. The environmental blowback against mining lithium and cobalt is just one of the complications associated with incentives passed by the Biden Administration’s Inflation Protection Act. In the meantime, the fossil fuel industry is increasingly making green diesel and other alternative fuels that are appeasing the ESG analysts. The bottom line is that the fossil fuel industry is now rising in ESG indices to stop the ESG blowback being pushed by Florida, Texas, and other states. The other irony is the DOL removed fiduciary liability from ESG risk factors, so clearly the federal government is no longer striving to protect investors from bogus ESG investments.
Navellier & Associates owns Panasonic Corp (PACRFY), Ford Motor Co. (F), Nvidia Corp.(NVDA, and Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) in managed accounts and a few accounts own Tesla (TSLA), per client request in managed accounts. Louis Navellier and his family own Panasonic Corp (PACRFY), Ford Motor Co. (F), Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) and Nvidia Corp (NVDA), via a Navellier managed account. He does not own Tesla (TSLA), personally.
The Two Major Jobs Reports Are Miles Apart – Ignore Them Both (for Now)
The big news was in the employment arena, but the data were conflicting. On Wednesday, February 1, ADP announced that only 106,000 new private payroll jobs were created in January, substantially below the economists’ consensus estimate of 190,000. The hospitality sector added 95,000 jobs, so the service sector dominated new job creation. Trade, transportation, and utilities shed 41,000 jobs, so the Amazon layoffs showed up there. The construction sector lost 24,000 jobs, but many of these jobs were weather-related. The manufacturing sector added 24,000 jobs. Interestingly, small businesses with less than 50 employees, shed 75,000 jobs, while large companies with more than 500 employees added 128,000 jobs.
By contrast, on Friday, the Labor Department announced that 514,000 new payroll jobs were created in January, substantially higher than the economists’ consensus expectation of 187,000. Past months were also revised higher. December and November payroll jobs were pushed up to a combined 550,000 (from 479,000 first reported). The unemployment rate declined to 3.4% (from 3.5%), the lowest rate in 53 years.
Average hourly earnings rose 0.3% (10 cents) to $33.03. In the past 12 months, average hourly earnings rose by 4.4%. Labor force participation remained unchanged at 62.4%. Overall, this was a stunning payroll report that I am 100% certain will be mentioned in President Biden’s State of the Union speech.
The ADP payroll report does not include government jobs, but there is no reconciling these two reports. I would ignore them for now. There is no way anyone can count all new jobs two days after a month’s end!
The Department of Labor on Thursday announced that weekly unemployment claims declined to 183,000 from 186,000 in the previous week. Continuing unemployment claims declined to 1.655 million, down from a revised 1,666 million in the previous week. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims continues to decline, so the labor market remains healthy and is not expected to influence Fed policy.
In other news, the Conference Board announced that its Consumer Confidence Index slipped to 107.1 in January, down from a revised 109 in December. The silver lining was the present situation component, which rose to 150.9 in January, up from 147.4 in December. However, the expectations component plunged to 77.8, down from 83.4 in December. Consumers may feel better but are scared of the future!
The Institute of Supply Management (ISM) announced on Wednesday that its manufacturing index dipped to 47.4 in January, down from 48.4 in December. Since any reading below 50 signals a contraction, manufacturing has declined for the past three months. The new orders component plunged to 42.5, down from 45.1 in December, while the backlog of orders component declined to 43.4, down from 45.4 in December. This is truly horrible, but the primary reason that the ISM manufacturing index did not fall further was that its new export orders component rose to 49.4, up sharply from 46.2 in December. So other than rising export orders, there were no “green shoots” in the January ISM manufacturing report.
The only “green shoot” came on Friday, when ISM announced that its non-manufacturing (service) index rose to 55.2 in January, up substantially from 49.2 in December. The business activity component surged 6.9 points to 60.4 in January (from 53.5 in December), but the big shocker was that new orders soared 15.2 points to 60.4 in January (up from 45.2 in December). Barely half (10 of 18) of the industries surveyed by ISM reported growth in January, so although the index expanded, some industries are still struggling.
Although there is talk of recession, it’s hard to see a recession when there is a 3.4% unemployment rate!
All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Also In This Issue
A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
The Global Fallout of the Fed’s Decision
Income Mail by Bryan Perry
The Market Will Likely Pause Until Some Obvious Questions Are Answered
Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
We’re in the “Sweet Spot” of the 4-Year Presidential Cycle
Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
A Big Euro Sell-off (Dollar Rebound) is Coming
Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
Emotions Drive the Market – But We Are Just Observant Passengers
View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.
Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.
None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.
Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.
One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.
ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:
- ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
- An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
- The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
- The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
- Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.
Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.
This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing email@example.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.
FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.
IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades. Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.
Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.
Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.
FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.