by Jason Bodner

February 22, 2023

At many points in our lives, we must ask ourselves, “Am I doing what is best for me?” But as creatures of habit, it’s easy to slip into routine and overlook the obvious. For instance, did you know that studies show that indoor air can be roughly five times more polluted than outdoor air? Yet most Americans spend 90% of their time indoors.

Likewise, investors should ask themselves, “Am I doing what’s best for me?” The answer can be confusing. That’s because many everyday investors don’t really have the tools to answer it…

First off, most investors simply don’t know what they are doing. And as far as professionals go – perhaps they too should ask the same hard stare-in-the-mirror question. A 2020 study found that over a 15-year period, over 90% of actively managed investment funds (in most categories) failed to beat the market.

SPIVA Chart

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

To be fair, the stock market is a confusing place. It’s up one day – down the next. One day we stress about war and interest rates. The next day we cheer earnings and ponder the latest incarnation of the recession debate: a “no-landing” situation. If you’re frustrated, clearly, you’re not alone.

Let’s get real for a second: If fewer than 10% of pros can beat the market in most categories, how can the everyday investor expect to beat the market? The answer, I believe, lies in data. The removal of emotion from investing might enable investors to answer that tough question: Am I doing what’s best for me?

I think it pays to be rigorous about data analysis. For me, emotion has little if any place in the world of investing. That’s why I follow the data: it’s unemotional, calculated, and completely objective.

Here’s what the data is saying now…

Last week I did a study on what to expect when you’re expecting an overbought market, which the Big Money Index says started on February 8th. To reiterate what it said about data going back to 1990:

  • The average overbought period lasts 23 trading days, or just under 5 weeks.
  • It took 16 days on average until the S&P 500 finally peaked, with an average gain of +3.1% more gains after the first day overbought.
  • Once the market peaked, it took on average of six days until the last day overbought.
  • The market fell an average of -1.8% from the peak to the last overbought day.

Here is a summary:

BMI Overbought Table

Plugging in those averages, the markets should stay overbought until March 14th. However, the past year and change has been anything but average. The latest BMI data suggests a short-lived overbought period.

With last Friday being the third Friday of the month, it was an options expiry day. That typically brings elevated volumes. Thus far, markets are in the red which indicates that the BMI will fall out of overbought upon the close. This means when markets open Tuesday, in all likelihood, overbought will be over:

BMI Index Chart

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

That’s both bad and good news. The bad news is that markets are usually choppy and soft immediately following an overbought period. This makes sense as buying wanes, any selling becomes more meaningful. In short- if less people are buying, then we can expect softer price action.

But there’s good news, too: Markets have usually done quite well after overbought periods, historically. The S&P 500 was positive – on average – 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months later:

S&P 500 Table

Let’s also analyze why we went overbought in the first place. After a year scarred by intense selling of stocks, we predicted a rally to start in October and last through April. Again, this was based on historical averages. It’s important to know that when stocks have been depressed for a long time, it doesn’t take much to perk them up. Part of our signal is that the stock must trade below an interim low to generate a sell. It must also trade above an interim high to make a buy. If stocks have been under pressure and trending lower for a long time, the high needed to create a buy gets lower and lower. When capital suddenly rushes in, perhaps to cover shorts, buy signals can appear quickly. This was seen in August last year. It quickly gave way to September and early October selling, Then, my prediction came to pass, and markets started rallying in mid-October. Buy signals appeared. This is seen in both stocks and ETFs:

Big Money Stock-ETF Charts

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

The rally may have started as a short-cover rally. There is plenty of data to suggest that. But then the rally just kept going with a small pause in January. Buying reached an absolute fever pitch February 2nd when we saw 456 stocks bought: the most since June 5th 2020. That was the peak of buying for now, so it stands to reason with feverish buying and an overbought market that things are a little over-heated.

In other good news, buying has been heavily concentrated in growth areas: These pie charts show tech, discretionary, industrials, and financials accounting for 60% of all buying since January 1st. Contrast that with Health and Energy accounting for 40% of all selling since then:

Percent Buys-Sells PIE Charts

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

Buying pushes growth sectors higher while staples, health care, and utilities are getting pushed lower:

Discretionary vs XLY Technology vs XLK Charts

Industrials vs XLI Materials vs XLB Charts

Financials vs XLF Energy vs XLE Charts

Staples vs XLP Real Estate vs XLRE Charts

Comm vs XLC Health Care vs XLV Charts

Utilities vs XLU Chart

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

In even more good news, the buying since January has been heavily focused in small and midcap stocks. This is another strong indication of “real” buying, as opposed to a mere short-cover situation:

Market Cap Chart

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

So there you have it – the data presents a pretty strong picture. The scary headlines will persist, but the data is saying that despite an overbought market, I expect some promising returns on the horizon.

Why stay indoors when outdoors is healthier for us? Many investors rely on news and pundits to chart their investing maps. That works for some, but odds say it doesn’t work that well for 90% of managers.

Perhaps data may help make better judgments.  As Will Rogers said, “Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.”

All content above represents the opinion of Jason Bodner of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

Also In This Issue

A Look Ahead by Louis Navellier
The Global Vise Tightens on Russia

Income Mail by Bryan Perry
Mounting Confusion About What Lies Ahead

Growth Mail by Gary Alexander
Explain This! Flat GDP + Market Crash = Soaring Tax Revenues!

Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
The Bond Market Now Looks to the Fed

Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
What Does an “Overbought” Market Mean?

View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here

About The Author

Jason Bodner
MARKETMAIL EDITOR FOR SECTOR SPOTLIGHT

Jason Bodner writes Sector Spotlight in the weekly Marketmail publication and has authored several white papers for the company. He is also Co-Founder of Macro Analytics for Professionals which produces proprietary equity accumulation/distribution research for its clients. Previously, Mr. Bodner served as Director of European Equity Derivatives for Cantor Fitzgerald Europe in London, then moved to the role of Head of Equity Derivatives North America for the same company in New York. He also served as S.V.P. Equity Derivatives for Jefferies, LLC. He received a B.S. in business administration in 1996, with honors, from Skidmore College as a member of the Periclean Honors Society. All content of “Sector Spotlight” represents the opinion of Jason Bodner

Important Disclosures:

Jason Bodner is a co-founder and co-owner of Mapsignals. Mr. Bodner is an independent contractor who is occasionally hired by Navellier & Associates to write an article and or provide opinions for possible use in articles that appear in Navellier & Associates weekly Market Mail. Mr. Bodner is not employed or affiliated with Louis Navellier, Navellier & Associates, Inc., or any other Navellier owned entity. The opinions and statements made here are those of Mr. Bodner and not necessarily those of any other persons or entities. This is not an endorsement, or solicitation or testimonial or investment advice regarding the BMI Index or any statements or recommendations or analysis in the article or the BMI Index or Mapsignals or its products or strategies.

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.