by Gary Alexander

November 9, 2021

What an important week we just witnessed. In a small but consistent way, Americans spoke out against a wide array of nonsense and reclaimed their “common sense” center. Maybe that’s one reason the stock market has been so robust this year – foreseeing our return to sanity. All four major stock market indexes hit new all-time highs, including the laggard Russell 2000 index (which our analysts had been predicting), and all four major indexes have now doubled from the March 23 lows – doubling in under 20 months:

INDEX Last Week 2021 to Date Since March 23, 2020
Russell 2000 +6.09% +23.41% +153.4%
NASDAQ Composite +3.05% +23.92% +142.1%
S&P 500 +2.00% +25.05% +115.3%
Dow Jones Industrials +1.42% +18.69% +100.3%
Data source: Yahoo Financial

The S&P 500 has risen seven straight days through last Friday. The biggest daily gain was Wednesday, the day after the shocking election results. Virginia and New Jersey dominated the news, so I won’t add any details there, but several other localities came to their senses. Minnesota voted out the “Defund the Police” cadre. In my little Northwest corner of the nation, we saw three super-Woke ballot initiatives go down in flames in a county that had voted 74% for Biden and only 23% for Trump in the last election.

One local measure called for a “new nine-member commission to provide oversight over the department of Environmental Stewardship regarding the department’s duties as to climate change…” which would likely expand into gardening permits and gasoline vehicle limits. It went down 60-40. Another called for an 11-member “justice, equity and inclusion commission,” which would color-code jobs for islands with few minorities. It failed, 63-37. A third measure admitting theft of land from natives went down 51-49.

Statewide, Washington State gave a 19+ edge to Biden in 2020, but voters rejected all three new spending bills, each resembling Biden’s wish list. State voters rejected an imposition of a new 7% surtax on capital gains in excess of $250,000 by a wide margin, 61-39, even though the state legislature passed it without a vote of the people. Voters slammed down a costly $432 million for a new suicide prevention hotline (54-46), and a 2% tax on “captive insurers” (57-43). Like other states, we’re in no mood for new taxes.

After the long hot summer of 2020 brought destruction to many inner cities and January 6 brought a foolish and failed Storming of the Bastille, this year has brought few demonstrations (although a lot of silly talk), as many Americans retreat to their Covid cabins and rethink the long haul of vaccinations and lockdowns. The result seems to be the beginning of the end of legalized madness. It won’t end tomorrow. Some extremists still think they hold the high ground, but Tuesday’s results clearly tell them they do not.

All this ties back to the stock market and corporate profits, since profits come easier in nations that practice the right Philosophy, based on the core Principles of freedom, enacted through Public Policy decisions (Politics) involving the right Programs and Plans, administered by good People. Companies may then magnify Profits through greater Productivity. Call it the 7-P Path to Prosperity: Philosophy + Principles + Politics + Programs and Planning with Productive People Produce Profits – in that order.

Therefore, it was no coincidence that I am also reading the newest book by our favorite economist, Ed Yardeni, “In Praise of Profits,” because he was spelling out these same important principles.

Turning the “Dismal Science” Into “Creative Prosperity”

Stock market profits must be accumulated in a milieu of relative freedom. That’s why last week’s mini-election and the relatively smaller spending packages now under consideration in Congress are important.

Too much political rhetoric is wasted on negative thinking – like hating the opposition, or wresting money from “the rich,” or fearing “existential crises” like “climate change” or “systemic racism,” which may or may not be half as serious as their partisan pundits fear. Economics is often called the “dismal science,” perhaps since all its greatest innovators tended to focus on shortages and negative outcomes.

Dour Pundits Malthus and Smith Images

Thomas Malthus (1766-1834) was the most negative, therefore the most beloved and most influential in the bearish community. In 1798, he predicted mass starvation since populations grow geometrically while food production grows arithmetically. He was mostly wrong on both counts, and he ignored technology, but neo-Malthusians still quote him to this day. The first economist, Adam Smith (1723-1790) was also too dour. He argued that capitalism was based on selfishness: “It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest.”

Yardeni disagrees. He counters: “This oft-quoted statement is totally wrong, with all due respect to the great professor. The butcher, the brewer, and the baker get up early in the morning and work all day long, trying to give their customers the best meat, ale, and bread at the lowest possible prices. They don’t do so because of their self-love, but rather because of their insecurity. If they don’t rise and shine early each day, their competitors will, and put them out of business. Entrepreneurial capitalism is therefore the most moral, honest, altruistic economic system of them all. Among its mottos are: ‘The customer is always right,’ ‘Everyday low prices,’ and ‘Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back.’” No selfish words there!

Karl Marx (1818-1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820-1895), only 25 and 23 when they first wrote The Communist Manifesto, “erroneously focused their analysis on class warfare, pitting industrial workers against their capitalist employers, who were caricatured as greedy, exploitive, and imperialist. They failed to understand that the only class that matters in capitalism is the consumer class, which includes everybody.”

Communists Marx and Engels Images

Likewise, economist Joseph Schumpeter (1883-1950) focused on the negatives when he called the trend toward greater wealth “creative destruction,” a funny name for better working conditions, safer jobs, and a better standard of living, so Yardeni renamed the process “creative construction” to focus on the winners.

In college, I learned that economics is the “allocation of scarce resources,” a delightfully economical (four-word) definition, but it’s vaguely negative, focusing on scarcity. In the latest (19th) edition of the dominant Economics textbook by Paul Samuelson (1915-2009, now co-authored by William Nordhaus, born 1941) the state’s role is expanded, so they define economics as “the study of how societies use scarce resources to produce valuable goods and services and distribute them among different individuals.”

Yardeni begs to differ. His short definition is “Economics is about creating and spreading abundance, not distributing scarcity.” He explains why he differs from Samuelson’s state-distribution-of-scarcity view:

“Economics isn’t a zero-sum game…. Economics is about using technology to increase everyone’s standard of living. Technological innovations are driven by the profits that can be earned by solving the problems posed by scarce resources. Free markets provide the profit incentive to motivate innovators to solve this problem. As they do, consumers get better products often at lower prices.”

Capitalism may be coming back in style. That’s what a strong stock market has been trying to tell us.

All content above represents the opinion of Gary Alexander of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

About The Author

Gary Alexander
SENIOR EDITOR

Gary Alexander has been Senior Writer at Navellier since 2009.  He edits Navellier’s weekly Marketmail and writes a weekly Growth Mail column, in which he uses market history to support the case for growth stocks.  For the previous 20 years before joining Navellier, he was Senior Executive Editor at InvestorPlace Media (formerly Phillips Publishing), where he worked with several leading investment analysts, including Louis Navellier (since 1997), helping launch Louis Navellier’s Blue Chip Growth and Global Growth newsletters.

Prior to that, Gary edited Wealth Magazine and Gold Newsletter and wrote various investment research reports for Jefferson Financial in New Orleans in the 1980s.  He began his financial newsletter career with KCI Communications in 1980, where he served as consulting editor for Personal Finance newsletter while serving as general manager of KCI’s Alexandria House book division.  Before that, he covered the economics beat for news magazines. All content of “Growth Mail” represents the opinion of Gary Alexander

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing info@navellier.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.