November 6, 2018

I’ve been the MC, panel moderator, and/or speaker at the New Orleans Investment Conference for each of the past 35 years, ever since I worked for its founder, James U. Blanchard III, in the 1980s. This year, the bears were out in force, as usual. They’re right one year in 10! There’s no sense in repeating the views of some of the perma-bears, whose views never change, but I was particularly concerned that one of the frequent bulls, Dennis Gartman, turned “bearish on stock prices,” saying we were “well into a global bear market,” citing the submerging “emerging” markets and the sub-par European and Asian markets.

Bond vigilante Jim Grant believes we are in a bond bear market, too. The “great bond bull market that began in 1981 with the absurdity of 15% Treasury yields ended in 2016 with the reciprocal absurdity of $11.9 trillion of marketable debt worldwide priced to yield less than zero. We think a new bond bear market is underway.” He cited Hoisington Investment Management data back to 1870 which says average nominal Treasury long-term yields have averaged 4.66%, or 152 basis points above the current 3.14%.

Grant created the most memorable imagery of the conference, in my mind, saying that the investment landscape today is like the busy investor flying all day, rejecting airline food, waiting for a hotel meal only to find that all restaurants are closed, room service is not available, and the only food at hand is the mini-bar with a $7 tin of Pringle potato chips. In other words, stocks, bonds, and currencies are of little value but are expensive, so what are you going to buy? At times like this, I am glad I edit Louis Navellier!

Mainstream analysts like Guy Adami of CNBC’s “Fast Money” and Peter Boockvar of the Bleakley Advisory Group and editor of the Boock Report were equally dismal. Adami’s talk, “Forewarned is Forearmed,” warned of the Fed’s unwinding of its bloated balance sheet. Boockvar’s talk, titled “Buckle Up,” added that the Fed is unwinding QT at the same time the European Central Bank (ECB) is ending its quantitative easing (QE) and the Bank of Japan (BOJ) is cutting its QE in half. A decade after the 2008 crisis, when the Fed quintupled its balance sheet and the BOJ bloated its balance sheet to nearly 100% of Japan’s GDP, they are just now beginning to unwind their “cure” to a decade-old crisis. After each of three rounds of QE at the Fed ended, Boockvar showed, there was a 10% or greater correction, and we’ve seen such a correction again in October. (Yes, I wanted to add, but the market recovered every time!)

With all this background, we entered the Sunday political panels, of which I was the moderator.

The Yin and Yang of Gold and Stocks in the Elections of 2016 & 2018

Since I cover both stocks and gold for Navellier & Associates, I was able to notice something that may have escaped many analysts at this conference, so I brought it up on my political panel. Back in October 2016, the S&P 500 fell 4.2% in the five weeks leading up to the election, on the presumption that Hillary Clinton would win. In a mirror image, gold rose in October 2016 from $1,254 to $1,303 on November 4, but when Trump won, gold fell sharply to $1,125 in mid-December and stocks took off like a rocket.

The same thing happened this year. Gold rose 3.4% since September 30 and the S&P fell 6.6% for a 10% gold/stock spread, based on the assumption that the Democrats will take over the House after Tuesday’s election. But what if the unexpected happens once again – the Republicans retain the House?  Then we could see a stock market rally and a decline in gold, just like what happened in November 2016.

However, in the greater likelihood that the Democrats win control of the House, gold should continue to rise and stocks could test their recent lows before rising again, before it sinks in that “gridlock” can also be a winning formula for stocks, as shown in recent decades – when Republican Ronald Reagan worked with a Democratic Congress and Democratic president Bill Clinton worked with a Republican Congress.

The odds calculated by “” predict an 85% likelihood of the Democrats taking over the House. Since World War II, the first mid-term elections after a new President has been elected have found the Party opposing the new President gaining an average 26 seats in the House of Representatives. If the President had a popularity rating under 50% (as Trump has) the average since 1945 is a gain of 37 seats.

Back in 1994, there was a “Republican Revolution” in the first mid-term election of the Clinton era, after Hillary Clinton’s flirtation with “socialized healthcare” had angered many voters. Republicans, led by Newt Gingrich and his “Contract with America,” stormed to victory with a 54-seat swing, taking control of the House for the first time in 40 years (since 1954), by a healthy margin of 230 seats to 204, thereby throttling the Clintons’ most aggressive liberal programs and leading toward greater prosperity, capital gains tax cuts, “the end of welfare as we know it,” and balanced federal budgets by the end of the decade.

This pattern has also occurred in the President’s second term. In 2006, after the Republicans had control of the House, Senate, and White House for six years, the Democrats took back 31 seats of the House in the 2006 mid-term elections to gain a 233-202 advantage to make George W. Bush a “lame-duck” President in his last two years, during a time leading into the deepest financial crisis since the 1930s, in 2008-2009.

After Barack Obama won in 2008, his record trillion-dollar deficits, Obamacare, huge stimulus spending packages, including “cash for clunkers” and “shovel ready” pork-barrel spending, led to what Charles Krauthammer called a “restraining order” at the voting booth in 2010, as Republican voters, led by a Tea Party movement, created a record 63-seat swing in the House to give the Republicans a 242-193 majority. (In the 2014 mid-term elections, Republicans gained 13 more seats to throttle Obama’s final two years.)

Something like that may happen this year, according to the pundits at “,” the Website that takes its name from the number of electors in the Electoral College. They follow each of the 435 House districts and 100 Senate races in granular detail and add up the details in real time. Their latest totals show an 85% chance that the House will go Democrat, with a median 40-seat gain for the Democrats. More comforting to Republicans, “” sees an 82% chance for the Republicans maintaining control of the Senate.

Most polls see about an 80% chance of the Democrats winning the House. Here’s what Crosstabs says:

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

But it’s encouraging to Republicans that in their last poll on November 8, 2016, “” predicted a 71.4% chance that Hillary Clinton would defeat Donald Trump for President, so the polls can be flawed.

About The Author

Gary Alexander

Gary Alexander has been Senior Writer at Navellier since 2009.  He edits Navellier’s weekly Marketmail and writes a weekly Growth Mail column, in which he uses market history to support the case for growth stocks.  For the previous 20 years before joining Navellier, he was Senior Executive Editor at InvestorPlace Media (formerly Phillips Publishing), where he worked with several leading investment analysts, including Louis Navellier (since 1997), helping launch Louis Navellier’s Blue Chip Growth and Global Growth newsletters.

Prior to that, Gary edited Wealth Magazine and Gold Newsletter and wrote various investment research reports for Jefferson Financial in New Orleans in the 1980s.  He began his financial newsletter career with KCI Communications in 1980, where he served as consulting editor for Personal Finance newsletter while serving as general manager of KCI’s Alexandria House book division.  Before that, he covered the economics beat for news magazines. *All content of “Growth Mail” represents the opinion of Gary Alexander*


Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for you. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Results presented include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings.

Past performance is no indication of future results.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not intended or written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE: The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Request here a list of recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. for the preceding twelve months, please contact Tim Hope at (775) 785-9416.

Marketmail Archives