November 6, 2018

The deepest place on earth is Challenger’s Deep, about 36,000 feet below sea level – so deep that if you put the base of Mount Everest in it, the peak would still be 1.2 miles below sea level.

Likewise, market bottoms can seem deeper than market highs seem high. The latest psychological bottom was likely put in on October 25. One main reason I feel this way is that we received an ultra-rare “oversold” signal the following Friday morning, October 26. In short, a ratio of unusual buying to selling I follow plunged below 25% for only the fourth time in the last 6.5 years. This means that under 25% of all unusual trading activity was buying. More than 75% of such activity was selling, and that is an unsustainable level. The prior times this happened, the forward returns of the market 2-8 weeks out were positive 100% of the time, and the average return of the Russell 2000 was roughly +8% after eight weeks.

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

We have seen a big rally in the market in the last few days, up 4.5% from Monday’s lows. Each day I run my model looking for unusual institutional trading – starting with the volume and volatility components that comprise the initial screen. Each day in this slide, we have seen nearly 1,200 stocks out of 5,500 tripping our model. Our daily number of institutionally-tradable stocks is roughly 1,400 out of 5,500.

The number of stocks that violate the volume and volatility thresholds and also breach interim highs and lows is what gives us our UI signals. That has been around 85 a day – down from anywhere between 200 and 800 in the height of the selling. What this means is that out of 1,400 stocks, about 1,200, or 85% of them per day, have shown unusual volume characteristics. This means 85% of the institutionally-tradable universe of stocks is exchanging hands in big volume on the way up from the bottom in late October, and only a handful are making new highs or lows on that unusual volume.

This is very bullish and constructive to me. After a market establishes a floor, the liquidity needs to moderate and constructive price action needs to begin. That’s where I think we are.

Add to that the recent sales and earnings reports: About 62% of the S&P 500 have reported, with an average of 8.25% sales growth and 24% earnings growth. Those numbers sound pretty fantastic to me.

What about “peak earnings momentum”? If this really does become the peak quarter (as was the concern in each of the prior three quarters), we are looking at a market only slightly less healthy. That is not a catalyst for a crash. It just calls for sector rotation and new leadership, which is where my focus will be.

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

Trade Resolution Now the Market’s Main Concern

As far as company guidance is concerned, as companies keep beating sales and earnings estimates, the overwhelming concern has become “tariffs and trade disputes causing us to be cautious on guidance.”

Many companies fear that trade problems will dilute their bottom lines in the future.

I have been saying for a long time now that I believe Trump will come out with a “magic bullet” to rescue the China trade talks before the mid-term elections. Right on cue, the positive language from his tweets asserts that he and Xi had “very productive talks and they all want a deal.” Trump can’t afford to see a floundering stock market and a damaging trade dispute going into the elections, giving the potential to threaten his chances for Congressional obstruction going forward. I believe the trade issue will resolve itself soon. When it does, these companies warning on guidance will likely restate their guidance higher.

Former Fed chair Janet Yellen came out last week with dovish comments, essentially warning the Fed about raising rates too fast. She was concerned that if the increases are not “moderate,” we could see inflation in 2020. So now Powell has both Trump and Yellen on his case about not being too aggressive on rates. The 10-year note is still at around 3.2 %, hardly a catalyst to dump equities and buy bonds.

The bottom line is that this selloff was caused by buying which dried up in the face of uncertainty over trade and elections. High-frequency traders (HFTs) shorted into weak bids. Technical levels triggered forced ETF selling, with hedging putting further pressure on stocks. That pressure caused forced institutional selling elsewhere. This spread to retail selling. This level of uncertainty is in the process of rolling off, and now there is a strong technical case from my perspective for a market bottom already being in.

There are many bullish catalysts from my perspective. Most of what I hear is despair and discomfort, from pain endured by the recent slide. The sentiment shifted to being almost entirely bearish, which is when I want to be bullish. China is rebounding, tech stocks are seeing some pressure from Apple’s weak guidance, but the Russell 2000 is flat, as of this writing. Domestic small caps, which have borne the brunt of so much punishment, are remarkably resilient. To me, this means that global trade resolution is getting priced into the market. This is the single largest market impediment now, in my opinion.

I know I sound like a perma-bull, but until the backdrop really changes, I think this is a “noisy” period which has inflicted a lot of damage, but it is not the beginning of a bear market. It was a “backdraft” event, in which buying liquidity got sucked out of the market. The explosive force of shorting and low liquidity was amplified into forced selling, which created a massively toxic month for the market.

I believe this was a reset for many crowded trades and an opportunity to see which sectors emerge, spawning new single-stock leaders. If someone asked me which was a bigger risk now – being long or being short – I’d say I am likely going to feel bad for the shorts very soon. After last week, I already am.

As Dan Rather put it: “Once the herd starts moving in one direction, it’s very hard to turn it, even slightly.”

About The Author

Jason Bodner
MARKETMAIL EDITOR FOR SECTOR SPOTLIGHT

Jason Bodner writes Sector Spotlight in the weekly Marketmail publication and has authored several white papers for the company. He is also Co-Founder of Macro Analytics for Professionals which produces proprietary equity accumulation/distribution research for its clients. Previously, Mr. Bodner served as Director of European Equity Derivatives for Cantor Fitzgerald Europe in London, then moved to the role of Head of Equity Derivatives North America for the same company in New York. He also served as S.V.P. Equity Derivatives for Jefferies, LLC. He received a B.S. in business administration in 1996, with honors, from Skidmore College as a member of the Periclean Honors Society. *All content of “Sector Spotlight” represents the opinion of Jason Bodner*

Disclosures

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for you. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Results presented include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings.

Past performance is no indication of future results.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not intended or written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE: The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Request here a list of recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. for the preceding twelve months, please contact Tim Hope at (775) 785-9416.

Marketmail Archives