by Gary Alexander

November 23, 2021

During Thanksgiving week, it’s good to pause and give thanks for our blessings.

Billions have emerged from poverty since 1990, in large part due to the fact that 30 years ago this month, the 20th Century’s longest-lasting Evil Empire collapsed. President Ronald Reagan took a great amount of flak for using that Star Wars phrase when referring to the Soviet Union on March 8, 1983, so his enemies took delight in calling Reagan’s nuclear shield plan (announced March 23, 1983) a “Star Wars” fantasy, but the Soviets (not the Russians) were indeed evil, as voluminous historical documents have revealed.

After the Soviets’ hardline coup failed in August 1991, one after another of their Eastern European satellites and member nations declared independence from the Soviet orbit, and on November 6, 1991, Russia’s new President Boris Yeltsin outlawed the Communist Party. By the next day, even Russia’s domestic papers referred to “the former” Soviet Union. The final nail in the Soviet coffin was hammered on December 1, 1991, when a Ukrainian popular referendum resulted in 91% of voters affirming their independence. (Ukraine was second only to Russia in economic and political power in the old USSR.)

On December 8, the leaders of Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus secretly met and proclaimed the Soviet Union had ceased to exist and announced formation of a Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), a loose association with minimal powers, and a formal dissolution of the USSR as of Christmas Day 1991.

Amazingly, the bulk of celebrity “intellectuals” from the 1930s through the 1950s defended the Soviet Union as at least a noble experiment, if not a preferable way of life to the greedy capitalism of the West. In his 1999 book, “Twilight of the Intellectuals,” Hilton Kramer profiled 18 such writers, and their naïve words are astounding. In Russia, wrote one, “Everyone has a personal freedom that we never dreamed of.”

The press was no better. Walter Duranty of The New York Times ignored the Ukrainian famine, which he saw killing several millions, and he won a Pulitzer Prize for it. Kramer cites another correspondent from The New York Times in Moscow in the late 1930s who wrote approvingly of Stalin’s show trials of 1937-38, in which up to one million military and intellectual apparatchiks were murdered. The literary editor of The New Republic also wrote often in defense of those trials, even favorably reviewing their transcripts.

The Evil Empire Images

Something similar happened in my college years, when kids wore Che Guevara T-shirts or carried Mao’s Little Red Book, blissfully unaware of the personal murders carried out by Che or the mass murders of Mao’s Great Leap Forward (about 40 million starved) or the Cultural Revolution (about 10 million dead).

America is not perfect, but we remain the world’s haven, not its torture chamber. I grew up reading books like “The Ugly American,” portraying us as unwelcome meddlers, but my experiences differ from such books. My wife’s family lived in The Philippines, 1959-60, and the Filipinos adored Americans for saving them from the Japanese in World War II. When we toured China in 1996, we heard the same story from older Chinese in Sichuan province about the Flying Tigers who volunteered to protect inland China from Japanese invaders (pre-Pearl Harbor), who murdered four million Chinese citizens. Numerous older Chinese on the streets thanked our older veterans for saving them from the Japanese invaders in the early 1940s. The same is now true in Vietnam. As unpopular as American involvement was then, what came after America left was far worse, as Vietnamese “Boat People” and Cambodia’s “Killing Fields” testify.

Going further back, the endless trench warfare of World War I only ended when America entered the war. Then, we won two wars on two continents in World War II after enduring 12 years of a Great Depression.

Invest in Freedom – and in America

Back in 1961, the year the Berlin Wall went up, in the seventh edition of his popular Economics textbook, Paul Samuelson said that the Soviet Union’s GDP, which he said was then half that of the U.S., would surpass the U.S. as early as 1984 but no later than 1997, due to their higher levels of economic growth.

In the 1980 edition, Samuelson pushed the Soviet’s triumph out to 2002 to 2012. Apparently, he bought into the official Soviet GDP figures (blue bar, below) rather than our CIA of the day or later revisions.

Soviet National Income Growth Bar Chart

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

The 1989 edition of Samuelson’s perennial best-selling Economics textbook, still used in many colleges today, relentlessly praised the Soviet economic system, saying, “The Soviet economy is proof that, contrary to what many skeptics had earlier believed, a socialist command economy can function and even thrive.” My wife, daughter, and I visited the Soviet Union along with 20 other high school students in 1986, and we could tell that was false. How could Samuelson miss it? Had he never visited the place?

Something like that may be happening now in China. Their GDP numbers have been record-setting, with double digit increases many years, and NO recessions, but their stock market seems to go nowhere. Their buildings also go nowhere. They are empty. It’s possible to create growth by erecting empty buildings, I suppose, with speculators investing in those husks, but what does that do for the middle class of China?

China's Slowing Economy Charts

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

Meanwhile, Europe’s “Democratic Socialism” has saddled them with cradle-to-grave entitlements, while most of their defense costs were offloaded across the Atlantic to their senior NATO partner, the U.S. President Trump partially succeeded in getting Europe to start ponying up their fair share for their defense, but Europe is now defenseless in energy supply, held ransom to Middle East and Russian sources … with winter coming.

After the Berlin Wall fell, Europe staged a momentary surge, but Europe actually suffered through a second post-2008 recession in 2011 – and numerous financial crises in the PIGS countries (Portugal, Italy, Greece, and Spain) – while the U.S. prospered. The U.S. keeps beating Europe in both GDP and market performance.

United Kingdom Equities Lagged Developed Market Alternatives Chart

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

American stocks have more than doubled the rest of the world in the decade from 2010 to 2019, pre-COVID, and U.S. markets have also recovered to new highs since COVID, while most other markets have trailed us.

United States Gross Domestic Product Growth versus European Gross Domestic Product Growth Chart

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

Bringing us up to date economist Ed Yardeni reminds us in his Monday newsletter (November 22, 2021), that “The US MSCI index has now risen in six of the past seven weeks.” Year to date, the U.S. is up 24.3% vs. All Countries (AC) ex-US, up only 6.8%. Latin America is down 14.7% and the BRIC nations are down 7.4%.

One lesson over this Thanksgiving weekend is that it pays, financially and personally, to invest in freedom.

All content above represents the opinion of Gary Alexander of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.

About The Author

Gary Alexander

Gary Alexander has been Senior Writer at Navellier since 2009.  He edits Navellier’s weekly Marketmail and writes a weekly Growth Mail column, in which he uses market history to support the case for growth stocks.  For the previous 20 years before joining Navellier, he was Senior Executive Editor at InvestorPlace Media (formerly Phillips Publishing), where he worked with several leading investment analysts, including Louis Navellier (since 1997), helping launch Louis Navellier’s Blue Chip Growth and Global Growth newsletters.

Prior to that, Gary edited Wealth Magazine and Gold Newsletter and wrote various investment research reports for Jefferson Financial in New Orleans in the 1980s.  He began his financial newsletter career with KCI Communications in 1980, where he served as consulting editor for Personal Finance newsletter while serving as general manager of KCI’s Alexandria House book division.  Before that, he covered the economics beat for news magazines. All content of “Growth Mail” represents the opinion of Gary Alexander

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at or by requesting a copy by emailing All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.