by Louis Navellier

November 16, 2021

The economy seems like it is standing at a crossroads. After the third quarter suddenly sagged, we are seeing optimistic forecasts for the fourth quarter, like the Atlanta Fed’s latest 8.2% annual GDP growth forecast. The key question is – will we sag, like the third quarter, or soar again, like the first two quarters?

First, here are the key catalysts supporting the economy’s strength this quarter. First, in the most recent FOMC statement, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell avoided any mention of the Fed raising key interest rates. As a result, Treasury yields meandered lower, which causes more money to pour into the stock market.

Second, the U.S. dollar is up strongly, since China is becoming more isolated and mighty Germany’s export machine is sputtering, so more global capital is expected to flow into U.S. Treasury securities.

Third, retail sales are expected to soar this holiday shopping season due to high consumer confidence as well as rising personal income. The shortage of some key goods should not derail holiday spending, since when consumers have money in their pockets, they will spend it on whatever is available.

But what about rising inflation? Fed Vice Chairman Richard Clarida last week said that recent imbalances should dissipate “without putting persistent upward pressure on price inflation and wage gains adjusted for productivity.” Clarida added that the rise in inflation this year is a “moderate overshoot,” The Vice Chairman added that most of his Fed colleagues who participate in rate-setting meetings believe the risks now are tilted to higher-than-anticipated inflation outcomes. Clarida is a key architect of the Fed’s policy statements, so his comments signal that the Fed has become frustrated with surging inflation and intends to squelch it in 2022, even though the Fed has failed to forecast more than one key interest rate increase.

Speaking of inflation, the Labor Department announced on Tuesday that its Producer Price Index (PPI) surged 0.6% in October and is now running at an 8.6% annual pace. Wholesale gasoline prices surged 6.7% in October. Excluding food, energy, and trade margins, the core PPI rose 0.4% in October and is now running at a 6.2% annual pace in the past 12 months. Service costs accounted for approximately 60% of the PPI increase in October. This means much of the rise in wholesale prices will be hard to reverse.

Then, on Wednesday, the Labor Department announced that October’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) surged 0.9% (a double-digit annual rate), the largest monthly increase since June. In the past 12 months, the CPI is running at a 6.2% annual pace, the highest rate in over 30 years. The core CPI, excluding food and energy, rose 0.6% in October and 4.6% in the past 12 months. Food prices surged 0.9% in October, while energy soared 4.8%, led by a 12.3% increase in heating oil and a 6.1% increase in gasoline. Natural gas prices also increased by 6.6%, so if we see a cold winter, utility bills will become abnormally high.

In the past 12 months, consumer price inflation has been led by a 59.1% increase in energy services (i.e., electricity and natural gas), a 49.5% increase in gasoline, and a 26.4% increase in used car prices.

Inflation is Far Worse in China and Europe Than in the U.S.

Wholesale inflation is even worse in China, as the National Bureau of Statistics announced on Wednesday that China’s Producer Price Index (PPI) surged by a record 13.5% in October compared to a year earlier. This was a 26-year high and up substantially from the 10.7% annual pace reported in September.

Although wholesale inflation is running out of control in China, the official consumer inflation rate is running at a lowly 1.5% annual pace in October, due to price controls at the consumer level. The National Bureau of Statistics cited extreme weather and shortages of some goods, but the Chinese authorities have ordered coal miners to operate at full capacity and rolled back restrictions on coal imports, while fixing electricity prices, so many Chinese power plants were having rolling blackouts, since they did not want to lose money due to high coal prices. Fixed electricity prices are one big reason why consumer inflation has not risen as much as wholesale inflation in China has risen. Regardless, President Xi has his hands full. He has not travelled internationally for over 21 months, as China’s domestic problems keep escalating.

In Europe, some energy prices are up four-to-five-fold as supplies dwindled and some countries went “all in” on solar and wind power, so China and Europe have demonstrated that inflation is a massive global problem. What amazes me, though, is that interest rates have stayed so low for so long, as major central banks are in no hurry to raise interest rates to squelch inflation, as they did during the inflationary 1970s.

On Tuesday, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said on National Public Radio that, as the pandemic fades, “I’d expect price increases to level off, and we’ll go back to inflation that’s closer to the 2% level that we consider normal.” After the October surge, however, inflation may not be dissipating as fast as they had hoped, so I would not be surprised if central bankers use this “transitory” language in 2022 and beyond!

In other economic news, the National Association of Realtors announced on Wednesday that median home prices rose 16% to $363,700 in the third quarter vs. the same quarter a year ago. Austin, Texas was the fastest rising home market, as prices surged 33.5% in the past 12 months. Naples, Florida was #2 with 32% annualized appreciation, and Boise, Idaho was #3, with 31.5% annual appreciation. Due to a tight inventory of existing homes for sale, median home prices are expected to continue meandering higher.

The Labor Department also announced on Wednesday that weekly unemployment claims declined to 267,000 in the latest week compared to a revised 271,000 the previous week. Continuing unemployment claims rose slightly to 2.16 million compared to a revised 2.101 million in the previous week. Although weekly unemployment claims are now at a post-pandemic low, both weekly and continuing claims were a bit higher than expectations. However, weekly claims can be volatile, especially as the holidays approach.

Who Will Save Us? Government or Private Initiatives?

An Overview of COP26 in Scotland

by Jane Hunt and Louis Navellier

Note: Jane Hunt, Navellier & Associates’ Director of Marketing and Design, lives in Britain and attended the World Climate Summit and Climate & Freedom Symposium, which was going on at the same time as COP26, which was only open to “accredited observers,” or selected super-rich celebrities like President Barack Obama. Let’s hope these accredited observers all bought carbon offsets for the massive carbon footprint they left from hundreds of private and government jets! According to Forbes:

“In the run-up to the event, 118 different business jets flew in… according to data compiled by WingX, an aviation consultancy. Overall, inbound private jets to Glasgow and Edinburgh airports were up 525% on the opening day of the summit compared with the previous seven days. Those taking private jets to and from COP26 include Jeff Bezos, Prince Charles, and Boris Johnson, who was criticized for flying back to London to attend a dinner on Wednesday evening.…Private jets are, by far, the most inefficient way to travel, and many have pointed out the hypocrisy of turning up to a summit on climate change on something that is contributing to its very cause.” (Forbes, Nov. 5, 2021)

The Scots are noted for their parsimonious nature, so it’s no surprise that the local Scottish press (“The Scotsman,” November 11, 2021) noted that the COP26 Conference in Glasgow cost more than twice any other previous climate event in terms of its “carbon footprint.” Even though they didn’t set such a great personal example, the conference did end on an optimistic note, reflected in a joint declaration between China and the U.S. that they would work together on a number of climate-related actions. In brief, the declaration states that the U.S. has a goal of providing 100% carbon-free electricity by the year 2035!

Frankly, this is not going to happen without carbon offsets, like planting millions of trees or sequestering carbon dioxide by storing it in rocks. Please excuse our skepticism, but the primary reason that China signed this declaration is that they are poised to profit from dominating worldwide solar panel production, and rare earth materials for lithium batteries, and by helping the world switch to nuclear energy.

The good news is that at the nearby World Climate Summit, private industry was very busy striving to get business active in meeting the world’s climate goals. The idea of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) investing is constantly evolving and continuously being redefined. Specifically, there were intense discussions on what “net zero” means, since definitions vary. For example, a vegetarian has a smaller carbon footprint than someone who eats meat, but it will be very hard to offset bovine emissions, since cows will continue to be cows, although it is possible to change their diets to reduce their gas emissions.

Another highlight of the World Climate Summit was an even harder goal, decarbonizing the travel sector. VW’s Global Head of Sustainability called for building more solar facilities, expanding car sharing schemes, and promoting walking and bicycling. Clearly, urban folks can reduce their carbon footprint more than those in suburbs and rural communities, since they do not have as much access to mass transit and car sharing. Furthermore, the pandemic caused many to flee city centers and head to suburbs and rural communities. As long as the trend toward “remote work” or “working at home” persists, it reduces commute time and pollution, but as office work resumes post-COVID, it will make commutes longer.

The Confusing Debate Over How to Increase Electricity 50% by 2035

By far, the most fascinating discussion at the World Climate Summit was electricity generation, which is expected to soar 40% to 60% by 2035 due to emerging markets as well as electric vehicles (EVs). Not surprisingly, offshore wind projects are very popular in Britain, since wind farms are everywhere and growing. Since making concrete is a big source of worldwide carbon emissions, building smarter cities was repeatedly discussed. Although buildings and infrastructure can be made more efficient, in old cities like Glasgow as well as throughout Europe, it is naturally overwhelming to attempt to reduce carbon emissions from buildings. The discussions about the virtues and drawbacks of low carbon concrete, glass, steel, and other building materials were endless, since they are so complex, and no real solution is in sight.

Bottom line, one of the most interesting outcomes of the COP26 conference is that four of the world’s largest auto manufacturers have not agreed to eliminate their carbon emissions by 2040, while countries with abundant hydroelectric power, like Canada and Chile, agreed to these goals. Big industrial nations like China, Germany, and the U.S. did not agree to eliminate emissions by 2040, since some countries are clearly blessed with abundant hydroelectric resources, while others still remain dependent on fossil fuels.

In particular, the U.S. was called out for its policy inertia regarding Green Energy. In addition to wind, solar, hydroelectric, and other green energy solutions, hydrogen was cited as the “technology of the future” and nuclear energy was also mentioned as a key solution. New technologies are still needed for both hydrogen and nuclear, but a small modular nuclear reactor was mentioned often. Battery storage facilities for excess solar and wind energy were also discussed, but the fact that there is a current shortage of iron-phosphate and lithium-ion batteries, due to growing EV production, was not thoroughly discussed.

In the end, we were pleased to note that the Climate & Freedom Symposium concluded that “markets will solve the climate crisis.” This is very true and a profound statement. Governments can provide carbon incentives, but the private sector and free markets usually provide the best, most cost-effective solutions.

Companies we recommend, like Enphase Energy (ENGH) and Generac (GNRC) are already helping to provide backup electricity solutions and decentralize the electric grids. We believe that entrepreneurs and innovative companies like Enphase Energy and Generac hold the key to fulfilling climate change goals.

Navellier & Associates owns Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH), and Generac Holdings (GNRC), in managed accounts. Louis Navellier and his family personally own Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) and Generac Holdings (GNRC), via a Navellier managed account.

All content above represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Please see important disclosures below.


Marketmail Survey #11 is now closed.

Also In This Issue

Global Mail by Ivan Martchev
Mind the Bond Market

Sector Spotlight by Jason Bodner
10 Reasons to Hug a Bear

View Full Archive
Read Past Issues Here

About The Author

Louis Navellier

Louis Navellier is Founder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Navellier & Associates, Inc., located in Reno, Nevada. With decades of experience translating what had been purely academic techniques into real market applications, he believes that disciplined, quantitative analysis can select stocks that will significantly outperform the overall market. All content in this “A Look Ahead” section of Market Mail represents the opinion of Louis Navellier of Navellier & Associates, Inc.

Important Disclosures:

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.

ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:

  • ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
  • An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
  • The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
  • The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
  • Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.

Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.

This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at or by requesting a copy by emailing All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE:The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.