October 16, 2018

The stock market shed its Teflon coating this past week in what was a nasty short-term correction, where the S&P 500 shed roughly 7% in seven trading sessions. Taking a rear-view mirror look as to why the sharp breakdown occurred at the time it did deserves examination, not only to understand why, but also to glean from the events whether the correction has run its course, just as earnings season is about to unfold.

From my vantage point, the selling was triggered by a confluence of events, some of which began during the last week of September and then came home to roost in the opening two weeks of October.

Aside from the obvious finger-pointing at the Fed’s decision to raise interest rates and the subsequent pop in Treasury yields that got the selling stone rolling downhill, there was a rising level of anxiety that fueled investor fears. Leading up to the September 25-26 FOMC meeting, there was already evidence of weakness in the real estate, semiconductor, materials, and financial sectors in highly active sector rotation.

And while the Dow, S&P, and Nasdaq traded at new all-time highs October 1-3, on the back of a few mega-cap stocks, there were already some leading stocks beginning to pause. At that point in time, the stock market was technically overbought on a purely short-term basis, and few market participants would argue with that view. Also, the sharp breakdown in Chinese, European, and Emerging Markets from many months prior had finally caught the attention of investors comfortably camped out in U.S. equities.

Here are the 12-month charts of China Shanghai, Euro Stoxx 50, and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index:

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

Heading into October, investors had to digest a flurry of political headlines and the latest policy statements from the Federal Reserve, which included another rate hike, the third one this year.

The U.S. at last implemented tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods, which triggered Beijing to impose retaliatory tariffs on $60 billion worth of American products. Chinese officials also canceled mid-level trade talks that had been scheduled for later in the week, dashing hopes for a near-term resolution.

Additionally, OPEC and several non-OPEC nations failed to reach agreements to increase crude oil output in order to counter falling supplies from Iran due to U.S. sanctions. President Trump criticized OPEC in front of the UN General Assembly, saying that the oil cartel is “ripping off the rest of the world” by colluding to limit supply and prop up prices. President Trump also called Iran a “corrupt dictatorship,” telling the United Nation that its leaders “sow chaos, death, and destruction.”

Future Fed Policies Will be Based Entirely on Future “Unknowns”

The policy directive coming out of the late-September FOMC meeting wasn’t a big surprise. The fed funds rate was raised 25 basis points to a range of 2.00% to 2.25%, which everyone expected, and the vote was unanimous, which wasn’t a surprise, either. Their projections for PCE inflation and core PCE inflation were steady between 2.0% and 2.1%, which means they see no big rise in inflation.

In the Q&A portion of Fed Chairman Powell’s press conference, he acknowledged that an inflation surprise to the upside would be a risk for a more aggressive tightening cycle, yet he quickly added that the Fed does not see that in its forecast. Powell also clarified that it is very possible the Fed would CUT rates in the event of a noticeable downturn in growth. The lack of a clear crystal ball was the major takeaway of Powell’s presentation. That was by design, as Powell has an even-keel delivery predicated on a belief that the Fed’s monetary policy actions are not to be considered preordained. They are subject to change.

The implication that the fed funds rate may move higher in 2019 and 2020 is based on how the Fed thinks the economy will evolve in the interim, based on Powell’s positive outlook in his prepared remarks, which acknowledged that the current U.S. economy is strong. Despite these clarifications, however, the Treasury market had its own bearish interpretation of matters that spilled over into the stock market.

So, while the recent pullback for the U.S. equity market might cause alarm bells to be going off, from a longer-term perspective it looks as if what has just occurred is a garden-variety correction. The weekly chart of the S&P 500 (below) demonstrates how today’s stock market tends to get overbought more frequently than in years past, much of it the work of algorithms that trigger the further buying of stocks when new highs are established, or the inverse when sell programs hit – like what just happened.

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

In other words, the computer cuts both ways, and after Friday’s close, the S&P is trading back down to the low end of the long-term primary uptrend line that has defined the bull trend.

Rather than try to dissect any further what all these converging forces will do next, let’s let the upcoming earnings and guidance season provide the evidence as to whether all this “paralysis by analysis” is warranted. The time-honored adage of “sales fixes everything” still holds true, especially for the stock market. If the companies that make up the S&P can show 6% to 7% third-quarter revenue growth, as is currently forecast, and more importantly, guide to similar top-line growth in the fourth quarter, then the past two weeks will have been viewed in the rear-view mirror as one heck of a buying opportunity.

About The Author

Bryan Perry

Bryan Perry
SENIOR DIRECTOR

Bryan Perry is a Senior Director with Navellier Private Client Group, advising and facilitating high net worth investors in the pursuit of their financial goals.

Bryan’s financial services career spanning the past three decades includes over 20 years of wealth management experience with Wall Street firms that include Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and Paine Webber, working with both retail and institutional clients. Bryan earned a B.A. in Political Science from Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University and currently holds a Series 65 license.

Disclosures

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for you. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Results presented include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings.

Past performance is no indication of future results.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not intended or written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE: The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Request here a list of recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. for the preceding twelve months, please contact Tim Hope at (775) 785-9416.

Marketmail Archives