January 23, 2019

As the positive headlines on the Chinese trade front multiply, we have seen stock market action in January that is exactly the opposite of what we saw in December: We’re now seeing relentless buying with every dip. I think it would be hilarious if the S&P 500 ends January near 2,800, which is where it started in December. (For those keeping track, the intra-day Christmas low was 2,346.56.)

The dark comedy here stems from the realization that there were a number of factors that were reinforcing each other in the fourth-quarter market decline, but none of them was economic deterioration in the United States, which in theory should be the driving factor behind any stock market action.

I have often said in this column that there will be a trade deal based on the realization that the domestic economic situation in China is very precarious and the lack of a trade deal will make matters a lot worse for the Chinese economy. Multiple media outlets reported that the Chinese made an offer in mid-January to go on a bigger-than-$1-trillion-dollar buying spree in a bid to eliminate the trade deficit by 2024.

I think this is a very good offer and one that will be the basis of a trade deal – no matter that the U.S. side wanted results much faster than 2024. The reason why the trade deficit has kept growing, despite the trade tensions and some added tariffs, is the strong economy in the U.S. and the fact that many key goods are no longer manufactured domestically.

I believe that the U.S. trade deficit with China can be eliminated completely, as the Chinese have been employing a very clever trade policy – to the detriment of the United States. Since China is a hybrid economy, Chinese state buyers control where China buys from. The Chinese have been running trade deficits themselves (i.e., trade surplus for the partner country) with many countries they consider key partners, so that they can increase their political influence. If China is the #1 trading partner for South Korea, for example, Chinese influence in South Korea can increase while U.S. influence decreases, despite the sizeable U.S. military presence there. There are numerous other examples where China is the #1 trading partner and the Chinese buy more on purpose – so that they can be more influential politically.

On the other hand, because the Chinese could get away with this clever maneuver, worthy of masterful Sun Tzu disciples, the American side has been enabling this activity by tolerating it, that is until President Trump showed up. Both Republican and Democratic administrations are at fault here as neither President George W. Bush nor his successor President Obama did anything to stop this Chinese trade policy.

It has to be noted that the trade deficit numbers in 2018 would be horrific in absolute terms (estimated to be $879 billion according to the Paterson Institute of International Economics), yet in relative terms things were a lot worse during the second George W. Bush administration, when the current account deficit as percentage of GDP hit 6%. That same number is 2.4% for President Trump.

Crude Oil is the Big Driver of the Improving U.S. Trade Balance

If you said shale oil production helped the trade deficit, you would be correct. It is true that in a recession consumption tends to suffer so the flow of trade with China and the rest of the world shrunk in 2008, but the reverse of that is happening right now. Back then, crude oil was a much bigger trade deficit problem.

Since U.S. shale crude oil production surged and is nearly three times the rate it was in 2008, when it took out its previous all-time high peak from 1970, its relative effect on the trade deficit became much less meaningful. Today, China is the largest importer of crude oil. For decades that spot was reserved for the United States. As the Chinese economy has dramatically slowed, as evidenced by the sharp fall in crude oil prices, confirmed by the sharp fall in industrial metals, the price of crude oil has fallen rather sharply.

It is interesting to note that the rebound in the London Metals Exchange Index is much smaller than the rebound in the crude oil price since the December 2018 lows, both on a relative and absolute basis. That tells me that sentiment is driving the price of crude oil and not necessarily demand, since we are in the seasonally weak period for crude oil (September-March) and investors are positioning themselves for a trade deal. I do not expect the Chinese economy to turn around on a dime after a trade deal is announced, which I believe will happen within the 90-day period ending March 1, notwithstanding any extensions that would be possible if the parties are close to a deal but the details have not been hammered out yet.

That means that the rally in crude oil is a rally to sell, not a rally to buy.

About The Author

Ivan Martchev
INVESTMENT STRATEGIST

Ivan Martchev is an investment strategist with Navellier.  Previously, Ivan served as editorial director at InvestorPlace Media. Ivan was editor of Louis Rukeyser’s Mutual Funds and associate editor of Personal Finance. Ivan is also co-author of The Silk Road to Riches (Financial Times Press). The book provided analysis of geopolitical issues and investment strategy in natural resources and emerging markets with an emphasis on Asia. The book also correctly predicted the collapse in the U.S. real estate market, the rise of precious metals, and the resulting increased investor interest in emerging markets. Ivan’s commentaries have been published by MSNBC, The Motley Fool, MarketWatch, and others. *All content of “Global Mail” represents the opinion of Ivan Martchev*

Disclosures

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for you. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Results presented include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings.

Past performance is no indication of future results.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not intended or written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE: The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Request here a list of recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. for the preceding twelve months, please contact Tim Hope at (775) 785-9416.

Marketmail Archives