January 2, 2019

January 2018 started with an unsustainable surge that was driven by $103 billion of record inflows into stocks. February 2018 was a sharp down month driven by the record air pocket created by those same record inflows that caused January to be a big up month. The reason why such air pockets exist in February is because the guidelines for major asset managers are to put new money to work almost immediately. That new money comes from pension funds and other institutional investors which, for various reasons, tends to come in January, creating positive seasonality.

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

The record air pocket in February was exacerbated by imploding volatility and inverse volatility ETFs and ETNs (dubbed ETPs) that self-destructed. The more the index goes down, the more the VIX futures rally, the more the VIX futures rally the more the leveraged inverse ETPs short the S&P futures which in response creates a surge in VIX futures, which wipes out the inverse leveraged VIX ETPs. That’s the hellish cycle that creates 80%-90% declines in inverse leveraged VIX ETPs – all in a single session of after-hours trading!

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

We got the tax cut in December 2017, which in economic terms can only be described as poorly-timed fiscal stimulus. While I am in favor of lower taxes, I am not in favor of exploding budget deficits. It would have been significantly better to cut spending along with cutting taxes so the deficit won’t explode in a good economy. While in principle I am all for “draining the swamp” and “making America great again,” exploding deficits are not the way to get there, in my professional opinion.

While fiscal policy has to be independent of monetary policy, the last time we had this momentous friction between fiscal expansion and monetary tightening was during the Ronald Reagan years, when the legendary President No. 40 (and his Democratic Congress) spent like drunken sailors and in the process bankrupted the Soviet Union, in effect winning the Cold War. He was of course helped greatly by Mikhail Gorbachev’s policy of perestroika, which undermined the grip of the totalitarian state on the economy and political life and helped communism crumble.

Spending like a drunken sailor without a Cold War is the last thing President Trump wants to do, as well as creating enemies with the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, even though Reagan was not fond of either Paul Volcker or Alan Greenspan. It is President Trump’s poorly-timed fiscal stimulus that caused the Federal Reserve to press harder on the monetary brakes for fear that the economy is running too hot. This caused multiple Twitter attacks against the Fed Chairman, which backfired in the stock market.

The Rookie Fed Chairman Faces the Rookie Politician

If quantitative easing was done in fits and starts and the Federal Reserve felt its way through the twists and turns of the unorthodox monetary policy, how can quantitative tightening be done on “autopilot”? I am sure Fed Chairman Jerome Powell will regret his words from his latest FOMC press conference, if he does not already. The autopilot remarks and the impression that he was more hawkish than he was expected to be caused another leg lower in the stock market creating the worst December since the Great Depression up until Christmas Eve, which was a day of a record decline for a half-trading session.

Treasury Secretary Mnuchin calling banks over the weekend to check on liquidity certainly did not help, nor did the President’s continued Twitter attacks on the Fed Chairman.

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

The reason why central bank balance sheet reduction can’t be on autopilot is that the Federal Reserve doesn’t fully know how disruptive such policy could be on the economy, the stock market, and other financial markets for that matter. When the Fed balance sheet monthly runoff rate went from $20 billion in January 2018 to $50 billion at present, the stock market began to flip like a fish out of water. There are certainly other factors for the volatility in the stock market, many which emanate from the White House, but such unconventional monetary tightening could be equally disruptive.

Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.

Quantitative easing created a lot of excess reserves in order to force-feed credit on a financial system that was going to naturally de-leverage after the implosion of bank balance sheets in 2008. In that regard it was a success. In order for QE to a be a complete success, quantitative tightening needs to be success too, as they are the opposite sides of the same coin.

The reason why QT may be disruptive is that it results in a lot of repurchase agreement activity between the Fed and its primary dealers. Repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements have been part of monetary policy for a long time, but never on the scale that we have seen in 2018. Repurchase agreements suck excess reserves out of the financial system, which is the same as sucking electronic cash out of the financial system. It is entirely possible that this record electronic cash suction rate is contributing in great degree to a weak stock market in an otherwise good economy.

About The Author

Ivan Martchev
INVESTMENT STRATEGIST

Ivan Martchev is an investment strategist with Navellier.  Previously, Ivan served as editorial director at InvestorPlace Media. Ivan was editor of Louis Rukeyser’s Mutual Funds and associate editor of Personal Finance. Ivan is also co-author of The Silk Road to Riches (Financial Times Press). The book provided analysis of geopolitical issues and investment strategy in natural resources and emerging markets with an emphasis on Asia. The book also correctly predicted the collapse in the U.S. real estate market, the rise of precious metals, and the resulting increased investor interest in emerging markets. Ivan’s commentaries have been published by MSNBC, The Motley Fool, MarketWatch, and others. *All content of “Global Mail” represents the opinion of Ivan Martchev*

Disclosures

Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.

Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.

Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.

None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.

Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for you. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.

One cannot invest directly in an index. Results presented include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings.

Past performance is no indication of future results.

FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not intended or written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.

IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE: The hypothetical performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported hypothetical performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma hypothetical performance results and are not actual performance of real world trades.  Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters contain hypothetical performance that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client might incur if actual investments and trades were being made by an investor. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment services which are separate and different from the newsletters. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or hypothetical Newsletter performance claims, (which are calculated solely by Investor Place Media and not Navellier) should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.

Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.

Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Request here a list of recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. for the preceding twelve months, please contact Tim Hope at (775) 785-9416.

Marketmail Archives